*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 29, 2024, 01:48:27 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Superpershing  (Read 6972 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ununoctium Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1256


« Reply #20 on: July 25, 2009, 03:24:24 pm »

i think there shouldnt be a counterpart to every ability axis/ allies have

I think that doctrine abilities should be balanced amongst their respective T2s. If one T2 is clearly weaker than another, it needs a buff, or the other needs a nerf.

Saying that a T2 shouldn't be changed because "i think there shouldnt be a counterpart to every ability axis/ allies have" is nonsensical, to say the least. T balance is judged on what they do, not how similar/different they are to each other.

It should be noted that doctrine abilities that affect only a handful of unit types typically are stronger than generalized doctrine abilities. One way or the other, this may need a change.

This argument is applied here for a T4. One more T4 thread coming your way and this ones gonna be a doozy.

When coming to think about it this T4 is good, it's just overshadowed/overlapped by Armour docs weird T4 layout.
HVAP Pershing is the same as superpershing in damage and even higher pen and buffs upgun shermans and Onboard is 1.5 free lives per pershing...
« Last Edit: July 25, 2009, 03:32:50 pm by Ununoctium » Logged


Quote from: shockcoil
Quote from: CrazyWR
My tigers get penetrated by everything.  Its really really frustrating.
Your tiger is a whore
boobaka Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 151



« Reply #21 on: July 25, 2009, 03:51:57 pm »

Pershing is fine as it is. no change needed. blitz don't need the T2 to be don't use armor vs me. they have 2shrek storms!!

Interesting, last time I checked blitz got bouble lmgs and defens got double schrecks, people will tell you everything if they want to get their way, so much for balance Smiley .

if u don't know double lmgs is a doc ability and storms can get 2 shreks with no extra doc unlock. get your fact right before u say that i am making stuff up
Logged
Ununoctium Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1256


« Reply #22 on: July 30, 2009, 06:22:26 am »

Anybody know why this got removed?

It was kinda a cornerstone of the doctrine
Logged
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #23 on: July 30, 2009, 06:33:55 am »

I wouldn't say it got removed, the devs just reserve the righ to scrap it and exchange it or alter it. So they made everything not yet implemented "TBA"(well most not completed things). So it might still be there, but in a different approach than before.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 35 queries.