Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2009, 12:59:41 pm » |
|
with l70, but since it's reskineed stug barrel is shorter then in real. l70 version  l48 (pak 39)  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2009, 01:04:28 pm » |
|
It's called the L48 in the RGDs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2009, 01:09:21 pm » |
|
But just look at the movie that model has l70 (shorter then it should be but it's for sure not l48) gun I guess creators of it were just not informed enough, if it had l48 they could just leave stug gun without any changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mgallun74
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2009, 01:12:10 pm » |
|
so whats the health points? and m18 and m10 and 57mm and zook penetration values on this tank?
and does it do same damage and pen of the panther gun then?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2009, 01:14:07 pm » |
|
Atm it has stug gun with boosted damage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2009, 01:14:29 pm » |
|
Draken, due to the way modeling works in CoH it has to have the shorter gun for the animations to work, its also why the superstructure isn't accurate for a Jadgpanzer IV.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2009, 01:16:00 pm » |
|
Yea I agree they could've just used the l48 one, but for some reason they went for a l70/48 hybrid. (L70 turret 'shape' with l48 length)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
 Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2009, 02:15:51 pm » |
|
so whats the health points? and m18 and m10 and 57mm and zook penetration values on this tank?
and does it do same damage and pen of the panther gun then?
It's the same thing as a stug basically. Only damage of panther gun, not the penetration afaik. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2009, 02:18:06 pm » |
|
It is a StuG gun, with 137.5 damage per shot.
Meaning, it's a StuG with a 57 percent buff to it's damage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2009, 02:26:19 pm » |
|
And now i lost one of them, to Piatsappers, 17pdr, Sherman and Brenbutton :/
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2009, 02:28:11 pm » |
|
This thing took 5 sherman upgun shots and kept trucking
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
 Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 30, 2009, 02:43:12 pm » |
|
It will not be doctrinal or anything, it will be a warmap unit.
So once you've reached certain conditions warmap-wise you will get some of them in supply.
Ohhhh, maybe that means US will get jumbo shermans at some point =D I wonder what they have up their sleeves for brits and PE. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 30, 2009, 02:49:52 pm » |
|
I think Eirrmod said it had 500HP, that's 100 more than a StuG
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2009, 03:09:38 pm » |
|
ooh, so what goodies shall we have for the allies  those neat little rifle squads again? I loved those. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
|
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2009, 04:52:41 pm » |
|
Eh I blew one up yesterday. It did more damage to my sherman per shot than a KT.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lt_Apollo
|
|
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2009, 05:08:30 pm » |
|
sexy tank
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #36 on: August 31, 2009, 03:03:45 am » |
|
Eh I blew one up yesterday. It did more damage to my sherman per shot than a KT.
If it penetrates, then yes! Sounds like a good unit to me, i already fell in love with it! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #37 on: August 31, 2009, 04:30:38 am » |
|
It does 206.5 damage to a sherman per shot, 30 damage if it bounces off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #38 on: August 31, 2009, 04:50:19 am » |
|
thats almost close to an ambush hellcat (which does 211 dmg to a P4) sounds fair imho
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 31, 2009, 04:54:26 am by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #39 on: August 31, 2009, 04:55:10 am » |
|
Ambush hellcat only does that kind of damage once in a battle, the jagdpanzer does it throughout the fight.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
