Email me response

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[lionel23]

I don't know, I see allied Heavy tanks not being popular for their cost and effectiveness.  Why get a sherman that dies and kills nothing with an M10 can kill both inf and tanks very well?  Or the m18 which has longer range and thus longer survivability?

Allied light vehicles are our only real advantage, while the axis are their reliance on superior, cheap heavy tanks (in that the base cost of said units).

When the devs address it, they'll address the issues, given time guys.  It's not like they're being paid to do this afterall to come out with patches ever night!  Unless someone has a whip.... ^^

[CafeMilani]

riflemen are their advantage lionel thats what i can tell u after a few days of playing amis.
i dont even need light vehicles. just a few ATGs w/ AP rounds, riflemen with nades (dont need bars) and stickies which have uberhuge range at vet2. thats it

[Draken]

Allies have decent light vehichles, axis have decent tanks. Thats the way it is, devs need to find a way to balance both so its even steve

I kinda agree with that, it's part of the assmietral balance imo, allies have superior light vechicles and axis have superior heavy tanks (not to mention jagd price).

Well I don't find stag and t17 spam anoying, maybe it's because I start with p4, and I have atleast 1 p4 on the field in 90% of the game.

[Demon767]

Allies have decent light vehichles, axis have decent tanks. Thats the way it is, devs need to find a way to balance both so its even steve

I kinda agree with that, it's part of the assmietral balance imo, allies have superior light vechicles and axis have superior heavy tanks (not to mention jagd price).

Well I don't find stag and t17 spam anoying, maybe it's because I start with p4, and I have atleast 1 p4 on the field in 90% of the game.

agreed i always have a p4 on the field till the very moment we lose or win. and also agreed that allies should have better light vehicles, tbh i have not lost to light vehicle spam yet, 5 p4s work yea

[Ununoctium]

Flammenwerfers and hotchkisses however are so bad that they arent fielded much though. American tanks are still very popular, and its hard to imagine them being popular despite being bad.

T17 vs tiger and hotchkiss vs pershing.

see which one is cost effective.

Myst tried a new hotchkiss spam company. It's super effective vs pershigns, churchills, light vehicles, infantry. med/light tank spam is the only way to deal wiht the little buggers. so shermanspam ftw but im just goign to end up crying buff the pershing again so ill stop here.

[Two]

My thread was better.

[EliteGren]

Funfact: Upgunned hotchkiss always penetrates a Pershing, so I can imagine it being effective.

[anthony210]

I havent been playing as much as I used recently.  The main reason is I do not like the direction the mod is going at this time.

The game is currently about who can spam more than the other guy.  Whether its light vehicles, volks, pumas, whetever.  Add in the fact that off maps are dominating most of the games as well as the numerous unit abilities that magically stun your vehicles and infantry.  Mines that fall from the sky, tanks that seem to do a World of Warcraft ground stomp that pins your infantry lol...  Maybe its balanced, but it certainly is not fun to play for me right now.

The game is not what It used to be.  I havent stopped playing because I am defeatist,  I can still win games.  I just dont enjoy it as much as I used to.  Take this for what its worth.

[Akranadas]

Hopefully some of those concerns will be fixed next patch.

[VERTIGGO]

Funfact: Upgunned hotchkiss always penetrates a Pershing, so I can imagine it being effective.

Wow an axis favoring gimmick! I did not know that. You should get a prize!

@Lionel: I can only afford 3 tanks. I don't see how 500 fuel is cheap, thats like 80% more than a firefly and twice the price of a churchill...