Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« on: November 19, 2009, 09:58:54 am » |
|
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.aspI'm an ENTP, what about you guys? My type is described as an inventor, who needs and makes sure he has mental stimulation, though he gets bored of things fairly quick. Famous people with my mental type - Theodore "Teddy" Rousevelt, Thomas Eddison and Alexander The Great .
|
|
« Last Edit: November 19, 2009, 10:50:29 am by Mysthalin »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2009, 10:42:41 am » |
|
I'm an ENTJ. A Fieldmarshall. Famous people with the same character - Napoleon for example.
ENTJs are often "larger than life" in describing their projects or proposals. This ability may be expressed as salesmanship, story-telling facility or stand-up comedy. In combination with the natural propensity for filibuster, our hero can make it very difficult for the customer to decline.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2009, 10:46:29 am » |
|
"Champion" here. Didnt think I had the same personality as Oprah Winfrey though.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 19, 2009, 10:48:04 am by Smokaz »
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2009, 10:50:57 am » |
|
and champion is what in letters?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2009, 10:51:14 am » |
|
ENTP
|
|
|
Logged
|
. . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
Ununoctium
|
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2009, 10:52:05 am » |
|
ISTJ "Inspectors (as much as ten percent of the general population) are the true guardians of institutions." Famous example: Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
Logged
|
My tigers get penetrated by everything. Its really really frustrating.
Your tiger is a whore
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2009, 11:40:19 am » |
|
"Champion" here. Didnt think I had the same personality as Oprah Winfrey though.
Champions can be tireless in talking with others, like fountains that bubble and splash, spilling over their own words to get it all out. Having read the other parts, i have to agree, it fits you the best!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Two
|
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2009, 11:52:36 am » |
|
I got bored halfway through the test, someone tell me what i would be.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2009, 11:54:17 am » |
|
I got bored halfway through the test, someone tell me what i would be.
Lazy idiot, no need for a test here.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheWindCriesMary
The Ethics Police
EIR Veteran Posts: 2630
|
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2009, 12:39:12 pm » |
|
I got Super Champion, which the test says is one level above Smokaz.
-Wind
|
|
|
Logged
|
Vermillion Hawk: Do you ever make a post that doesnt make you come across as an extreme douchebag?
Just sayin'
|
|
|
EscforrealityTLS
|
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2009, 01:45:17 pm » |
|
INTJ
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pwanawan baby!
|
|
|
Leafedge
|
« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2009, 02:43:11 pm » |
|
INTJ - Mastermind. It describes me very well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lai
Propaganda Minister
Posts: 3060
|
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2009, 02:47:12 pm » |
|
INTJ too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Falcon333
|
« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2009, 02:58:45 pm » |
|
I got INTJ aswell, so something is obviously wrong here, since it should theoretically be 1% (of a population)
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Chance favors the prepared mind"
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #14 on: November 19, 2009, 02:59:03 pm » |
|
INTJ Meh Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging Strength of the preferences % 44 75 12 11 Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
* moderately expressed introvert * distinctively expressed intuitive personality * slightly expressed thinking personality * slightly expressed judging personality
maybe we are that 1% we all enjoy the same game and fight all the time over the same silly crap.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
Leafedge
|
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2009, 03:02:49 pm » |
|
Tests like this are very rarely accurate. It will be able to tell you some things about yourself that you already knew, but yeah, I wouldn't put any credit to this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Falcon333
|
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2009, 03:11:15 pm » |
|
maybe we are that 1% we all enjoy the same game and fight all the time over the same silly crap.
Maybe, where do these archetypes (if that is the correct word) come from? I've never heard of these things before (I mean things like INTJ etc...)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2009, 03:51:41 pm » |
|
You lie, there's no super champion. There can't be!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
501PIR
|
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2009, 04:23:28 pm » |
|
Tests like this are very rarely accurate. It will be able to tell you some things about yourself that you already knew, but yeah, I wouldn't put any credit to this.
The test is as accurate as how honest you are. A few examples; 1. You are almost never late for your appointments. - In reality, some people are always late by 5 mins, 10 mins or even 30 mins to an hour. It is a stigma to say that you're late, therefore people say they are almost never late. It didn't say you're never late though logic dictates that almost never late refers to majority of the time... 7. You tend to be unbiased even if this might endanger your good relations with people - Hypothetically speaking, its always good to be unbias. In reality, people are usually bias but they'll of course, say otherwise because being labeled "bias" is a bad quality. Some questions essentially mean the same thing but people may answer it differently... that wouldn't really be logical. 39. You are more inclined to experiment than to follow familiar approaches & 53. When solving a problem you would rather follow a familiar approach than seek a new one. Are asking whether you'll use a new method... or you'll use something familiar. That's all. You should theoretically answer both yes or no. If you answer truthfully, thats great for you. It helps to figure out yourself. If you think someone's lying, you can always check their post history and see if it tally with what they claim
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
|
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2009, 04:36:23 pm » |
|
ENTJ, the Rational Field Marshall.
Sounds mostly like me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1: Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance. We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.
|
|
|
|