Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2010, 06:32:27 am » |
|
Nice one, it will be fun to see them KTs again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malevolence
Donator
 Posts: 1871
|
|
« Reply #21 on: March 18, 2010, 06:33:46 am » |
|
meh, i still wondering how i will beat 2 obm pershings with ab support.
PaK spam. 4 storm screcks and 2 king tigers, backed up by 2 paks 3 Doctrines to counter 2 doctrines?  There's a pak doctrine? Give plz. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1: Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance. We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it. |
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2010, 06:40:50 am » |
|
Pak doctrine LOL , i can totaly see that
Elite tank destroyers T4 - Pak gains 40% more speed on cloak , luger guy gets +20 range and armor penetration of 1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
 Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #23 on: March 18, 2010, 09:20:42 am » |
|
meh, i still wondering how i will beat 2 obm pershings with ab support.
PaK spam. 4 storm screcks and 2 king tigers, backed up by 2 paks 3 Doctrines to counter 2 doctrines? There's a pak doctrine? Give plz. No but, 1 Blitz and 2 Terror doctrines |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Two
|
|
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2010, 10:57:34 am » |
|
tbh would need 4 doctrines to have your tanks backed up by penetrating paks as they would need cloak while move.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
 Posts: 2238
|
|
« Reply #25 on: March 18, 2010, 05:34:48 pm » |
|
meh, i still wondering how i will beat 2 obm pershings with ab support.
Piece of cake. Jagdpanther and two ATHTs. Treadbreak both pershings, back off and focus fire the ABs when they go after the jagd. Jagd can solo two treadbroken pershings easilly once the airborne dies horribly to focus fire. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #26 on: March 18, 2010, 05:37:18 pm » |
|
What if the AB has mortar smoke?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
| Dnicee
|
|
« Reply #27 on: March 18, 2010, 05:39:21 pm » |
|
What if there is no PE?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #28 on: March 18, 2010, 05:42:47 pm » |
|
These discussions are getting silly.
Get back on topic or thread gets locked.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #29 on: March 18, 2010, 06:37:43 pm » |
|
meh, i still wondering how i will beat 2 obm pershings with ab support.
Piece of cake. Jagdpanther and two ATHTs. Treadbreak both pershings, back off and focus fire the ABs when they go after the jagd. Jagd can solo two treadbroken pershings easilly once the airborne dies horribly to focus fire. that works |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
Computer991
Donator
Posts: 1219
|
|
« Reply #30 on: March 18, 2010, 08:08:58 pm » |
|
Less theorycrafting more replays
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malevolence
Donator
Posts: 1871
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 19, 2010, 03:19:01 am » |
|
What if there is no PE?
What if everything we know is a lie?! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Eternal
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 19, 2010, 07:19:57 am » |
|
What if everything we know is a lie?!
Then you're a buddhist? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
