NightRain
|
|
« on: April 02, 2010, 06:47:34 am » |
|
Stubby upgun Puma with T17 Rapid firing Gun for Axis pl0x  Pretty please? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
 Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2010, 06:48:55 am » |
|
this looks like p4 ist short barrel
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2010, 06:50:21 am » |
|
we dont need another op unit
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Jinker
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2010, 09:02:30 am » |
|
Oh look, it says Heavy Armored Car... only fair then if we implement it, let pistols and such penetrate it on a regular basis.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2010, 09:27:47 am » |
|
what museum this is? They have a T26 that was capped by Finnish (see the Swastika) right next to the Stub puma.
Axis T17 GO!
Would it be OP?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2010, 09:31:22 am » |
|
it would be like the t17s  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2010, 10:23:46 am » |
|
give it t17 firing speed,and P4 IST dmg  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| wittman420
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2010, 11:49:12 am » |
|
It wouldent be as op i think, the puma has less health
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2010, 11:51:50 am » |
|
40 less health ammounts pretty much ammounts to absolutely nothing in terms of how many shots it would take from standard weapons capable of dealing with light vehicles.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2010, 12:22:04 pm » |
|
In theory crafting
Brensquad stops it
Riflesquad can sticky it
2 ATG shots
One tank to counter it Esp: M10, M18 Hellcat as they can chase it
Sherman is too slow for it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2010, 12:56:52 pm » |
|
it would be op and it won't happen anyway , axis already got plenty of anti inf tanks and vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| wittman420
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2010, 02:29:50 pm » |
|
u can never have tomuch at  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2010, 02:39:30 pm » |
|
u can never have tomuch at as PE fixed. i say NO to another op staghound |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2010, 01:45:14 am » |
|
u can never have tomuch at as PE fixed. i say NO to another op staghound Its not a Staghound its a Puma. The gunner in it is Sniper hans who got tired of being gang raped by 6 jeep callins and/or Fire up troops |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2010, 03:19:38 am » |
|
you can have your stubby puma if i can have my RR jeeps, its only fair.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 03, 2010, 02:51:48 pm » |
|
you can have your stubby puma if i can have my RR jeeps, its only fair.
you got yourself a deal Stubby puma like a T17 rapes motorbike |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 03, 2010, 03:59:21 pm » |
|
true^^
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
