CrazyWR
|
|
« on: April 22, 2010, 04:03:14 am » |
|
Just curious on everyone's thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
skaffa
Honoured Member
 Posts: 3130
The very best player of one of the four factions.
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2010, 04:17:14 am » |
|
It seems to me its all about massing infantry now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
bad luck skaffa> creates best and most played eir maps
> hated for creating best and most played eir maps
47k new all time record?
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead |
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2010, 04:19:40 am » |
|
Lower the fuel more
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
| UnderHeavyFire
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2010, 04:25:59 am » |
|
I don't want to see the fuel lowered any more, especially from a PE stand-point. There are 3 non-vehicle/tank units available to Tank-Hunter PE (4 if you include Mine-sweeper) - making for a very bland unit combination when low on fuel.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Eternal
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2010, 06:46:02 am » |
|
I would not mind the FU being lowered. But I can see how it could make PE bland, so lower it, but not as much for PE. Or at all
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2010, 06:46:38 am » |
|
Lower Fuel
Even more 50mms as all Marders would be sold due to 120 fuel requirements
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2010, 06:47:55 am » |
|
fine as is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2010, 09:22:08 am » |
|
Perhaps implement different amount of resources depending on doctrine?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "Well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one." |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2010, 09:43:27 am » |
|
Perhaps implement different amount of resources depending on doctrine?
Nightmare to balance. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
3rdCondor
Donator
 Posts: 1536
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2010, 10:33:01 am » |
|
stop complaining, start playing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2010, 10:40:30 am » |
|
Perhaps implement different amount of resources depending on doctrine?
Nightmare to balance. Ye, it was just a thought. I am quite content as it is, resource wise. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| wittman420
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2010, 12:40:02 pm » |
|
just limit all heavys to 1 per company
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Dragon2008
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2010, 01:14:16 pm » |
|
just limit all heavys to 1 per company
I agree with wittman 150% No company should be able to field 2 heavys. I don't mind leaving the fuel as it is but been able to have 2 heavy's really ticks me off. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
PC Specs:
CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1100T @ 3.3ghz
RAM: 4GB
Motherboard: ASUS M5A99X (EVO)
Graphics Card: ATI HD 6970 2GB
Hard Drive: 1TB
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2010, 03:30:04 pm » |
|
Super heavies to 1 per company is what it is right now. Heavies at 2 Per company is fine also for the time being, Until the meta game radically changes Heavies are just not a damaging presence. They are a sink more often then not
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2010, 03:31:34 pm » |
|
Reducing heavies and super heavies further rape the viability of the unlock, you pay 3 points for those things and in a lot of doctrines you can buy very potent alternatives for those 3 unlock points.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2010, 03:41:01 pm » |
|
Superheavies are already limited to 1 and most heavies are limited to 2. Nothing needs to be changed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2010, 03:46:59 pm » |
|
issue has nothing to do with heavies, please stay on topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| VERTIGGO
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2010, 06:48:17 pm » |
|
seems to me... it has everything to do with heavies until you explain your motive behind the poll. Sure you can get everyone to vote based on ambiguous information and blanket rhetoric (US elections anyone?), but if no one knows exactly what aspect of EIRR a fuel crunch would exacerbate the most, it's not clear what your grievance with the current system is. (though it apparently has to do with PE grief)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 22, 2010, 06:50:00 pm by VERTIGGO »
|
Logged
|
TOV units = intentionally OP marketing gimmicks
|
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 22, 2010, 07:11:42 pm » |
|
PE is built upon fuel, so lowering it would be a disaster. But is there still a problem with eg. Staghound spam or tank spam? If so would we need to draw a line of how many of each unit we can have again? There wouldn't be spam that way. But we would lose some freedom to build battallions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| bayarea510
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 22, 2010, 08:45:12 pm » |
|
I am doomed as PE if the fu will be lower even more!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
00:00:28 [Team] imnotsoisoisoi: they're noobish
00:01:07 [Team] imnotsoisoisoi: this is gonna be gg in 15 mins
...
00:28:50 [Team] RonnMercy: bring something on
00:29:04 [Team] imnotsoisoisoi: im out
00:29:05 [Team] RonnMercy: ur terrible lol
Gg in 30, half right at least
|
|
|
|
Poll
