*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 10, 2024, 07:17:31 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Vehicle Spam  (Read 20310 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Demonic Spoon Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 538


« on: May 28, 2010, 12:50:44 am »

I feel like the mod in general is skewed towards vehicle spam.



There's a HUGE emphasis on vehicles and anti-tank. Infantry battles are comparatively scarce and any (non-AT) infantry brought in are usually brushed aside by armored cars or tanks.


EDIT: Nevermind. I thought about it some more and realized it's generally just light vehicle spam. Increase light vehicle costs across the board...Make them a somewhat significant fuel investment and increase manpower costs a bit as well
« Last Edit: May 28, 2010, 12:59:43 am by Demonic Spoon » Logged
Grundwaffe Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1128



« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2010, 01:00:19 am »

I know brooooo, totally agree.
Thats why im staying away from EiR a bit, im just doing vanilla til they get to solve theese issues.
But yeah, something needs to be done.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2010, 01:02:06 am by Metro123 » Logged

SublimeHauken - Back from the dead - Since 2007'
vivie5 Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 45


« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2010, 04:30:06 am »

I for one support less Vehicle Spam Cheesy

More German infantry on the field I say!
Logged
Armfelt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 453



« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2010, 04:42:10 am »

I think it is quite fun to micro vehicles, but yeah I agree on that tanks should be rare, atleast more uncommon.

Edit: But they have lowered the available fuel quite a bit, + reduced the availability of super heavies atleast, which are good :]
« Last Edit: May 28, 2010, 04:43:53 am by Armfelt » Logged


"Well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one."
Demonic Spoon Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 538


« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2010, 11:42:13 am »

I don't think it's quite so much tanks as vehicles. For all intents and purposes they have no fuel cost, and the MP cost is quite low.
Logged
Draken Offline
Chess master
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1850



« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2010, 11:56:08 am »

Vechicles are overpspammed that's true, in EiR we can see oppostie thing to vCoH were many players are noobish in use of infantry and think they are pro in tank battles, tanks are always easier to micro then infantry, so I support the idea of somehow limiting tank spam.
Logged
nated0g Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 90


« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2010, 11:59:37 am »

Allied Light Armour Spam (LAS) has been an issue for a longggg time. Since the T17s arrival its been an issue.

I see why tho, the British stag is very cost effective. For me it kill an average of about 10-15 men each on a good run. And I have 12 stag hounds so it worked out very well.

Stag needs a slight health decrease and a pop increase of 1.
Logged
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2010, 01:05:26 pm »

its all factions Nate, not just allies...
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2010, 01:23:19 pm »

PE spamming vehicles! Who would have seen that one coming?
Logged

i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
nated0g Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 90


« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2010, 01:36:12 pm »

Ive havent seen any PE/WM light vehicle spam of any effectiveness on the scale of the Stag/T17 spam.
Logged
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2010, 01:48:17 pm »

Ive havent seen any PE/WM light vehicle spam of any effectiveness on the scale of the Stag/T17 spam.

have you seen anyone attempt to Wink
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
nated0g Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 90


« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2010, 01:50:26 pm »

Yea, PE Armoured Car spam wiht 50Mms, but since allies have cheap MANPAT (55 MM bazooka and 90 MM boys AT), seems fairly pointless.

SO yes, Light Vehicle Spam is quite an allied thing to do.
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2010, 01:53:41 pm »

isnt stag nerfed enough? compared to t17 he doesnt do all that well...
Logged
SX23 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 356


« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2010, 02:29:32 pm »

The only problem I got with this is that PE/Wer don't have any anti-light vehicles. Let's give a quick example: Rangers vs Armored Car-- I let you guess who wins. Then 2 shrecks squads against a stag: I again let you guess who wins....
Maybye giving a light anti at to axis might be good?
Such as 2x light panzershrecks or something like that? Something that could scare off light vehicles like rangers do with AC?
Logged

With Courage shall we Rise,
With Might shall we Fight,
With Glory shall we Stand,
With Honor shall we Falter,
For the Fatherland shall we Prevail.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2010, 02:57:00 pm »

Anti light vehicles? You mean schrecks? 2 zooks = 150 dmg 1 schreck = 120 dmg.

I just played a game where i saw a double schreck storm 2 hit 3 stags that were full health, so i'd have to say that schrecks are a lot more effective.

It takes 4-6 zook hits to take out most light vehicles on wehr and pe and thats if they hit as they have worse accuracy than schrecks do. Pumas do just fine vs rangers imo, as do pe armor cared, and the LAT with FF is a lot better than any stag or t-17 at taking out infantry, 2 is over kill.

IMO, i see more axis lv spam lately and vehicle spam in general than i've seen allies. I play both sides remember and i have to totally change my allied company now to combat all the vehicles i've seen lately.

One thing with the fuel decrease that it's done is made less tanks but more light vehicles. So, I think that the vehicle pool just needs to be reduced instead of trying to lower fuel again. Cuz the thing about changing fuel prices on vehicles and tanks is that you create more space for something else to be used. So if u could afford 5 tanks and can only take 4 now with the 100 fuel decrease, that extra 150 that you have now will be used by light vehicles.
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2010, 02:58:25 pm »

You mean like Panzerfausts and AT Grenades?
Logged
Groundfire Offline
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511



« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2010, 04:11:08 pm »

allied light vehicle spam again?

Uhhhggg, hang on, let me destroy this already broken record.

I did this yesterday to Snoop's T17 with 1 upgunned puma.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Rb0M2MPtmA

If you fall victim to light vehicle spam, you rly only have yourself to blame.
Logged

Latest Shoutcast:
EIRR Groundcast 11 "The Super Dev Showdown!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGm79rXWhU (full version)

CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2010, 04:15:44 pm »

hail groundfire, greatest light vehicle killer of all time! lol
Logged

Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #18 on: May 28, 2010, 05:02:19 pm »

That was PURE luck. The same pure luck that makes a cloaked m18 miss a upgun puma at short range. Way 2 go, groundfire.
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
brn4meplz Offline
Misinformation Officer
*
Posts: 6952


« Reply #19 on: May 28, 2010, 05:08:53 pm »

Watch the video again you nub, it wasn't cloaked
Logged

He thinks Tactics is a breath mint

Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  Tongue

the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom Wink
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 36 queries.