*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 15, 2024, 04:24:08 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Commandos (CW)  (Read 1987 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Warfreak166 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 94


« on: June 02, 2010, 08:10:39 pm »

Alot of people tell commandos fail
why is that?
and whats gonna be the top tier 2 of the commandos doctrine gonna be . .
please be commando AT squad or british airborne infantry
Logged
Grundwaffe Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1128



« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2010, 01:34:10 am »

People can't use them correctly thats why, they are the most useful units on the CW in my opinion.
Logged

SublimeHauken - Back from the dead - Since 2007'
brn4meplz Offline
Misinformation Officer
*
Posts: 6952


« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2010, 02:41:03 am »

They are expensive. On a starter company you'd be lucky to get 2-4 squads. Which i suppose might work for you.

I used to run a heavy commando company and attrition was high. if your smoke is off cooldown you can wreck people but you'll take losses you can't afford trying to combat volks spam or something similar. Not only that but I must have lost 30+ squads of vet 3 commando's from glider crashes or Pak's being in the back field for some reason(Pak's 1 shot a landing glider)
Logged

He thinks Tactics is a breath mint

Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  Tongue

the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom Wink
Warfreak166 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 94


« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2010, 03:52:24 am »

ye about that why are commandos soo expensive!?
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2010, 03:59:16 am »

It's an age old discussion, warfreak - there's a lot of threads about it.

I was too under the impression commandos are simply far too expensive to be worth it, but this kind of changed when I tried creating a post in favour of commandos getting a cost reduction.

I chose to compare commandos to their closest brethren : the StG44-armed Assault grenadier. While comparing them on a man-to-man basis, I have found that while commandos are only minorly more expensive than the StG44 troops per man - they're quite superior. They both have the same health and armour type, yet commandos have further benefits.
The sten is superior to the StG44 - having better short and medium range, which means it will start dishing out it's maximum potential damage sooner.
Commandos have smoke - which is simply invaluable in aiding the commandos' survivability.
Furthermore - Commandos glider into combat, which helps in their job of raiding enemy support weapons from behind.
Finally - the 6 men in a commando squad means their firepower dilutes slower than the firepower on StG44 squads.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 35 queries.