*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 28, 2024, 05:53:48 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [PE] 50mm ht vs. at gun acc  (Read 3716 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hydro Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 242


« on: July 06, 2010, 04:54:55 am »

I played some against, and as PE and I have some conclusions:
-marder compared to it just sucks and is not completely worth its cost
-50mm at ht ammo cost is 10 ammo less than shreck.

But it's not about that some units of PE need some love

It's about 50mm accuracy vs anti tank guns. I realise that it should kill tanks etc and it hasn't treadbreaker or focuse fire, but it shouldn't be used as counter to at guns. It nearly no miss at guns and kill them in 3 shots. HT's should be counterable by at guns, but not otherwise.
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2010, 04:55:59 am »

ATGs have better chance winning a 50mm than 50mm vs it. It is a PAK38 that has wheels
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Uglysori Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 301

The very best player of one of the four factions.

« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2010, 06:15:44 am »

It's raw numbers games. The game in question I was probably using 2-3 50mm versus your half-life ATG.  It takes 3 50mm shots to kill a full-health ATG, it takes 2-3 ATG shots depending on AP rounds to kill a 50mm. It's usually a very bad trade to use less than 3 50mm hts vs a single ATG unless the ATG is distracted or already damaged given how fuel starved PE usually is.  If there are two ATGs in the area facing the right direction it's almost impossible to win that fight unless your running triple Vet 2+ hts and u have a spotter.
Logged
kwiatekkek Offline
okultysta, mistyk, szachista i alpinista.
*
Posts: 702



« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2010, 06:17:59 am »

use jeeps,always fac the threat.

GG 50 mms

Logged


"L2P" is like a Auswitcz tattoo on your arm, a mark of the survivor.
*cough* Team Lead is Allied bias, just FYI
Hydro Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 242


« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2010, 06:25:02 am »

ATGs have better chance winning a 50mm than 50mm vs it. It is a PAK38 that has wheels
Actually I saw that pak has bigger problems with hitting at gun than at ht
Logged
rifle87654 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1107


« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2010, 06:57:57 am »

ATGs have better chance winning a 50mm than 50mm vs it. It is a PAK38 that has wheels
It can't CLOAK!
Logged

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
Does he have a problem?
Anyway he's hilarious.
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2010, 07:34:16 am »

the pak is in every way superior in both accuracy and penetration(and even damage) compare to the 50mm ATHT.
Logged

sgMisten Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 778


« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2010, 08:24:32 am »

It's raw numbers games. The game in question I was probably using 2-3 50mm versus your half-life ATG.  

This is the main reason.

50mm ATHTs excel at head-oning ATGs because u can focus fire with several of them. You can't do that with ATGs because that's asking for arty/mortar decrewing of those ATGs.
Logged
Firesparks Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 1209



« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2010, 02:40:31 pm »

the pak is in every way superior in both accuracy and penetration(and even damage) compare to the 50mm ATHT.
the gun on the pak is mostly identical to the one on the 50mm atht. The only difference I've noticed is the pak fires a bit faster (~one seconds), slightly longer range (60 vs 55) and have ambush bonus.

 
« Last Edit: July 06, 2010, 02:47:09 pm by Firesparks » Logged


With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2010, 03:18:41 pm »

And ambush bonus covers what? Accuracy(1.25 acc) Pen (5x Pen) and Damage (1.25 dmg).

Firing faster equals more DPS, and more range means you're just flat out better ;p.

So, like I've said - pak gun is in every way superior to the 50mm's gun.
Logged
Heartmann Offline
Officer of Kindness
*
Posts: 1776



« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2010, 06:20:59 pm »

The real advantage with 50mm is fisrt its much mor versitlie unit and it cant be decrewd by mortar rounds, this works both ways ofc beeing ince the vec is dead you cant reuse it. I still think its better than pak or at gun, but thats as i like beeing offensive
Logged

In the basement getting drunk.
It's not really creepy until I show up.............

- I've heard of being an animal in bed but...

- The phallic principle of the Navy Wink
Firesparks Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 1209



« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2010, 03:56:52 am »

The real advantage with 50mm is fisrt its much mor versitlie unit and it cant be decrewd by mortar rounds, this works both ways ofc beeing ince the vec is dead you cant reuse it.
you normally decrew pak gun by using small arms, grenade, or mortar, all of which are much less effective against Ht. The same thing that will destroy a ht will also destroy a pak as well.

You can also repair the HT.  

And ambush bonus covers what? Accuracy(1.25 acc) Pen (5x Pen) and Damage (1.25 dmg).

Firing faster equals more DPS, and more range means you're just flat out better ;p.

So, like I've said - pak gun is in every way superior to the 50mm's gun.
Even if the pak gun is superior simply due to the awesomeness of ambush, the 50mm at ht still carry a very potent gun.

From what I've seen, the 57mm doesn't act as a direct hard counter to the 50mm atht. Normally the 57mm will win, but that's mostly due to the 57mm's much better DPS. It's like sending a 76mmto kill a pziv. You usually need at least two 50mm atht to kill a 57mm. 
« Last Edit: July 08, 2010, 04:17:33 am by Firesparks » Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2010, 04:14:20 am »

Set a 57mm vs a 50mm ATHT - and it'll generally win quite handily. The true reason why 50mms seem to be doing bettter is because people use them in pairs. But all it takes to counter that is setting up a pair of 57mms - and the balance shifts in the US player's favor yet again Smiley.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 36 queries.