Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 09, 2024, 10:16:17 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 4
Battles in progress: 1
Battles waiting: 0
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
[ALL] Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: [ALL] Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG (Read 9634 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #20 on:
January 05, 2011, 09:54:24 pm »
Quote from: EliteGren on January 05, 2011, 09:46:55 pm
So can a StuG, and yes I've seen it
but its more likely with tigers because of a higher splash. they have a horrible habit of taking out 3 and 4 men at a time. taking out whole hmg and mortar squads in one hit decrewing at guns by firing at the front of them. tigers can be quite annoying...especially when u plink a shot off the back of one
Logged
Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #21 on:
January 05, 2011, 09:56:06 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on January 05, 2011, 09:54:24 pm
but its more likely with tigers because of a higher splash. they have a horrible habit of taking out 3 and 4 men at a time. taking out whole hmg and mortar squads in one hit decrewing at guns by firing at the front of them. tigers can be quite annoying...especially when u plink a shot off the back of one
You do know that the Pershing does the same thing right.
Logged
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #22 on:
January 05, 2011, 11:40:24 pm »
Quote from: AmPM on January 05, 2011, 09:56:06 pm
You do know that the Pershing does the same thing right.
except that pershings have more counters on the axis side than tigers on the allied side. once u take out allied at guns, tigers can pretty much roam free unless there's zooks or rr's around
Logged
spinn72
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #23 on:
January 05, 2011, 11:44:59 pm »
rr's as a counter to tigers?
Now i've heard everything!
Logged
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #24 on:
January 05, 2011, 11:50:32 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on January 05, 2011, 11:40:24 pm
except that pershings have more counters on the axis side than tigers on the allied side. once u take out allied at guns, tigers can pretty much roam free unless there's zooks or rr's around
You mean, ATGs, M10's, Fireflies, bren carrier + PIAT, cloaked M18's, Pershings, etc right. On top of that you have Stickies to keep the Tigers from rushing your lines.
Logged
spinn72
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #25 on:
January 05, 2011, 11:59:46 pm »
Marders, Jagdpanther, Tigers, King Tigers, Cloaked storms, teller mines, ATG's, Panthers, Magnetic AT grenades, Pak 40's, Flak 88's,
^ Lets not pretend like Axis counters to heavies are worse than Allied counters. Sure, allies have counters that slow heavies, but it's necessary to compensate for what Americans lack.
With doctrine buffs such as HVAP Americans can stand a better chance, but for any Inf or AB company, if you want to efficiently destroy a Tiger/KT/Panther then it's just ATG's, m10's and m18's. With Tigers and KT's one shotting crews of ATG's, this can be frustrating as you can imagine.
«
Last Edit: January 06, 2011, 12:56:17 am by spinn72
»
Logged
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #26 on:
January 06, 2011, 12:02:43 am »
More types of counters does not mean more effective or economical counters.
57mm/PaK and M10 are probably the most efficient.
Logged
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #27 on:
January 06, 2011, 01:50:03 am »
you mean to tell me storms are a more economical counter? or a jagd or tiger, or king tiger.
toe to toe the pershing can only beat anything thats a panther and below, after that you've got the jagd, tiger and king tiger, where the jagd is faster, has more armor a stronger run and longer range and if the user is smart does not allow the pershing to stafe it, which because of its speed is relatively easy.
tigers and kts are obvious, stronger armor, gun.
The fact is that the axis are so much better at engaging tanks at range than the allies are. After a pershing tanks out a pak, he still has to be on the look out for fausts and schrecks and storms and panthers and tigers, marders, 50mm HTs, hotchkiss. While once you get past a 57 with a Tiger, you just have to be on the look out for stickies which have to be very close to throw and they're basically suiciding a unit to cripple the tank.
It's easy enough to just look on the leaderboard, 3 pershings, none are vet 3.
oh look, whats that at the top of the wehr leaderboard? 4 tigers, 1-4 3 of them vet 3, 2 of those with over 1,000 xp.
there are 9 total pershings with vet 2 and above, 11 tigers and they both take the same amount of xp to level up.
Logged
NightRain
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #28 on:
January 06, 2011, 02:33:04 am »
Quote from: Killer344 on January 05, 2011, 06:10:46 pm
100% hypocritical ftw?
lol.
It is the truth Killer :p there aren't many replays that doesn't show a Tiger getting stickied by vet 2 squad or a random vanilla riflesquad. Every replay posted pretty much has a sock in Tiger's wheels killing its engine.
Tiger's long range accuracy sucks, it only dances with the nice love of the splash and HEAT isn't improving it much at all.
Either way the list AmPm had mentioned pretty much contains all the effective counters to a tiger. Pershing is known to one shoot squads of infantry and pounce pak shells (If the pak isn't pak40 that is), plus pershings are hell lot harder to fight vs than Tigers have ever been. A game with 6 Tigers is far easier than a game with 6 pershings
Logged
Quote from: Unkn0wn on June 05, 2011, 04:01:40 am
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
PonySlaystation
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #29 on:
January 06, 2011, 02:48:00 am »
That doesn't make any sense. A Tiger getting stickied is very rare. Pershing and Tiger are almost identical. A supported heavy tank is hard to fight no matter what side it's on.
It all comes down to good all fashioned micro.
And as far as AT goes, Axis are somewhat superior. I'd take 88s, ninja paks and shreck storms over fireflies and piats any day.
Logged
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #30 on:
January 06, 2011, 03:50:17 am »
Quote from: PonySlaystation on January 06, 2011, 02:48:00 am
That doesn't make any sense. A Tiger getting stickied is very rare. Pershing and Tiger are almost identical. A supported heavy tank is hard to fight no matter what side it's on.
It all comes down to good all fashioned micro.
And as far as AT goes, Axis are somewhat superior. I'd take 88s, ninja paks and shreck storms over fireflies and piats any day.
than play axis?
Logged
Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves
Nevergetsputonlistguy767
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #31 on:
January 06, 2011, 04:00:58 am »
except pershing is better cuz of it's speed,and has much better buffs
Logged
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #32 on:
January 06, 2011, 04:09:17 am »
I like how the name of the thread has everything to do with the discussion taking place
.
Logged
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
Re: Pak 38 vs 6pdr/57mm ATG
«
Reply #33 on:
January 06, 2011, 05:32:24 am »
Stay on topic, this isn't about tigers.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...