*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 15, 2024, 09:10:46 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [CW] British Officer Pool Costs  (Read 3574 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« on: May 12, 2011, 10:54:17 am »

Now that FOO has been nerfed into a acceptable status so that Captain spam with FOO lost its effectiveness. I recommend that Pools of 6 come down to lower Pools.

Point 1: Officer Stack has been gone for as long as one can remember so having more than 1 officer on the field is not a issue
Point 2: If a British infantry coy has officers in it they chip off nice ammount of 6 pool per officer drawing you easily into Oversupply and resorting you to be in...well "I got 500 manpower and 250 mun, WTF I SPENT THIS ON?!"

Point 3 V

Officers are also hardcapped, so there's not much harming in lowering pool values either way. (Assuming this is an issue a lot of Brit players are having)
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 10:59:14 am by NightRain » Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2011, 10:55:31 am »

Officers are also hardcapped, so there's not much harm in lowering pool values either way. (Assuming this is an issue a lot of Brit players are having)
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 11:00:59 am by Unkn0wn » Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2011, 11:19:20 am »

i dont have a problem with it. I used to have 4 total officers in it (2 caps, 2 lt's) but i also run 10 infantry (5 recons 5 tommy's) never had an issue :shrug:
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Poppi Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1080


« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2011, 11:25:07 am »

what does the US command squad do with their concussive strike? It looks like it does nothing.
Logged
TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2011, 11:28:54 am »

what does the US command squad do with their concussive strike? It looks like it does nothing.

smoke
worked best with assult riflemen with flamer tactic, too bad they got rid of it
Logged

Quote from: Grundwaffe
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Smiley
Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.

Work Harder
Poppi Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1080


« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2011, 07:44:40 pm »

smoke
worked best with assult riflemen with flamer tactic, too bad they got rid of it

oh it thought was something harmful. Like hurts or debuffs enemies.
I was using it on them the whole time Sad

Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2011, 07:50:00 pm »

^ lol thats awesome.

muwhahaah i drop smoke on you!

Sad why u no die! i drop smoke on you!
Logged
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2011, 07:50:48 pm »

all of this stuff aimed at the british, cmon man honestly, currently the british are EASILY the most powerfull faction in the game for countless reasons. they dont needa make it even easier to win
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
Poppi Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1080


« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2011, 01:58:18 am »

^ lol thats awesome.

muwhahaah i drop smoke on you!

Sad why u no die! i drop smoke on you!

well its concussive strike. That sounds like harsh shit i dont want to drop anywhere near my guys. But i guess its something i do?
Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2011, 08:19:29 am »

Someone forgot to change the description of it when it was still an offmap with a plane or something. It's instant mortar smoke
Logged

i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2011, 08:26:23 am »

Someone forgot to change the description of it when it was still an offmap with a plane or something. It's instant mortar smoke

Why dont you guys make it a single squad offmap instead of an universal one?
its smoke, sure the smoke spam was quite annoying but now you only get 3 squads and common unless you have OP Overlord you aint gonna use it for the buffs that often unless you are figting mgspam
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2011, 08:55:59 am »

David!!!! Somebody's proposing to let us have 3 officers on the field at the same time cycling smoke again! Smiley))

Double inf coys?
Logged

Scotzmen Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2035


« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2011, 11:25:57 pm »

Officer pool gets really restricted when you have both sappers and tommies. And have a ton of MP left.
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2011, 12:07:28 am »


Officers are also hardcapped, so there's not much harm in lowering pool values either way. (Assuming this is an issue a lot of Brit players are having)
+1
« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 08:02:53 am by tank130 » Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 36 queries.