nugnugx
Donator
 Posts: 4051
|
|
« on: July 26, 2011, 12:58:17 pm » |
|
Should Tiger range be increased to 45 like King Tiger ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2011, 01:01:32 pm » |
|
no, next question
kthxbye
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| marda145
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2011, 01:04:36 pm » |
|
Should Tiger frontal armor be better?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2011, 01:11:43 pm » |
|
Most definitely not. No.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
| RoyalHants
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2011, 01:14:20 pm » |
|
Should axis fanbois be quiet , yes
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yeah calbanes, I mean - some people like smokaz are still yet to win a single game, even though they've been around here for years.
  |
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2011, 01:15:11 pm » |
|
Should I use Tiger? No!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Katusha
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2011, 01:50:45 pm » |
|
Did you just lose 2 tigers last game? YES!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| marda145
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2011, 01:54:07 pm » |
|
Did you just lose 2 tigers last game? YES!
Would another tanks did better job? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2011, 01:56:22 pm » |
|
Would it not?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2011, 02:13:43 pm » |
|
rofl
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| SaintPauli
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2011, 02:29:24 pm » |
|
The stats of the tiger are from a time when it was only facing a very limited amount of other tanks (M10, Sherman and Pershing). Since then every other tank introduced into the game have had a minimum of 45 range. The problem with the range was previously compensated for with longer barrels*. But now the old champ is slow and his penis is simply not long enough to compete with the current lineup of porn stars
IMHO both the Pershing and the Tiger should have their range increased to 45 like all other Heavy Tanks (even though the Pershing already received a buff to its gun as well as an AT option).
*Longer barrels had the unfortunate side effect of also buffing the all other Blitz tanks.
M4 Sherman Range 40
Panzer IV Range 40
Stug IV Range 40
M26 Pershing Range 40
Tiger Range 40
Cromwell Range 40-45
Churchill MK IV Range 40-45
Churchill MK VI Range 40-45
Hotchkiss Range 40-45
StuH 42 Range 45
M10 Tank Destroyer Range 45
M18 Hellcat Range 45
King Tiger Range 45
Jagdpanther Range 45
Sturmpanzer IV Range 45
Jagdpanzer IV Range 45
M36 Jackson Range 45
Comet Range 45-50
Panther Range 47.5
Hetzer Range 50
Jagdtiger Range 50
Achilles Range 50-55
Sherman Firefly Range 55-60
Geschutzwagen Range 60
Marder III Range 60
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2011, 02:31:11 pm » |
|
rofl again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2011, 02:31:58 pm » |
|
Yep.
Heavy tanks should have longer range than medium and light tanks so they can defend themselves because they don't have the speed nor the range currently.
Mediums and light got the advantage of speed and can circle strafe them. I would even drop the range of m18 and m10 to 40. Their speed and pen is enough to get close and circle strafe. No need for them to out snipe a heavy tank.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2011, 02:33:15 pm » |
|
stop it! you're killing me laughing!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2011, 02:39:21 pm » |
|
Yep.
Heavy tanks should have longer range than medium and light tanks so they can defend themselves because they don't have the speed nor the range currently.
Mediums and light got the advantage of speed and can circle strafe them. I would even drop the range of m18 and m10 to 40. Their speed and pen is enough to get close and circle strafe. No need for them to out snipe a heavy tank.
lol. they also die in 3 shots. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 DERDBERTLike Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2011, 02:40:53 pm » |
|
lol. they also die in 3 shots.
Tiger will also die if you get bum rushed by 2 m10. 1 shot missed from tiger and youre dead. Even 1 m10 can leave you with 1/3 hp if you can circle it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2011, 02:41:14 pm » |
|
l2micro
&
l2support
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 26, 2011, 02:41:48 pm » |
|
l2micro
&
l2support
l2giveusefulladvice |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 26, 2011, 02:42:36 pm » |
|
Tiger is fine, if you can't use it, you fail.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 26, 2011, 02:43:55 pm » |
|
Tiger is fine, if you can't use it, you fail.
this. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
