*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 02, 2024, 11:59:42 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: no g43 on falls,why?  (Read 7222 times)
0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #20 on: July 30, 2011, 09:29:18 pm »

g43's were really good on them thats the problem. i saw more falls with g43's and rifle nades than fg42's

Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #21 on: July 30, 2011, 10:14:43 pm »

Thats because FG42's are overpriced.

Same with MP44 Stormies.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #22 on: July 31, 2011, 03:06:22 am »

so whats wrong with diversity of unit and more different army builds?   Roll Eyes

Actully I dont see all that much rifle nades on falls in game,they tend to be hit or miss,sometimes they will be very good,other times they wont do shit,thus I deselected them in 2 of my falls companys and I have used them extensivly! +100 games with them,and rly,lately,they dont do much.
Logged
Heartmann Offline
Officer of Kindness
*
Posts: 1776



« Reply #23 on: July 31, 2011, 03:19:55 am »

I was akways against removong g43 from falls, and the fg 42 is overpriced imo
Logged

In the basement getting drunk.
It's not really creepy until I show up.............

- I've heard of being an animal in bed but...

- The phallic principle of the Navy Wink
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #24 on: August 03, 2011, 03:14:10 pm »

bring back g43 to falls and remove rifle nades? i  never see anyone with rifle nades anyway , people just fg42 now that there is no g43.
Logged

SaintPauli Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 530


« Reply #25 on: August 03, 2011, 03:17:38 pm »

Thats because FG42's are overpriced.

Same with MP44 Stormies.
+1

G43 would rape because of priceing...
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #26 on: August 03, 2011, 03:30:12 pm »

bring back g43 to falls and remove rifle nades? i  never see anyone with rifle nades anyway , people just fg42 now that there is no g43.

go and watch smokaz,coy rly isnt all that good,but when you have 2 players who spam them,backed up with KCH,that's rly hard nut to crack.
Logged
Rocksitter Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 495



« Reply #27 on: August 03, 2011, 03:36:17 pm »

 With Improved Logistics the rifle nades are good without not so good...

I liked all the options on falls and the g43...
Logged

SaintPauli Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 530


« Reply #28 on: August 03, 2011, 03:40:16 pm »

but when you have 2 players who spam them,backed up with KCH,that's rly hard nut to crack.
It’s like faceing BARs and Thomsons - except they also get modifiers vs. suppressed units….
(End the tyranny of suppression!!!)
Logged
Rocksitter Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 495



« Reply #29 on: August 03, 2011, 03:48:47 pm »

 Getting rid of all  SF types could be a good idea...
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #30 on: August 03, 2011, 03:51:37 pm »

Noooooo! Don't take away my fg42/riflenade combo! noooooooooooo

Riflenade>g43
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #31 on: August 03, 2011, 03:54:28 pm »

Riflegrenades are win!
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #32 on: August 03, 2011, 03:56:07 pm »

bring back g43 to falls and remove rifle nades? i  never see anyone with rifle nades anyway , people just fg42 now that there is no g43.

imho the fg42 is overpriced (i personally use the falls only with default rifles) but thats not that bad since the fg42 improves with doctrine abilities (covering fire, +1 upgrade, remove of penalties of covering fire)
so it depends of your doctrine choice if it makes up the price or not

and the g43 on the other hand i don't know how much it would improve the dps (to lazy to calculate the dps for falls k98)
but yeah i don't think it would be op to have it as an option
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #33 on: August 03, 2011, 08:14:13 pm »

I was akways against removong g43 from falls, and the fg 42 is overpriced imo

Many upgrades are, especially those for elite infantry. There is a dire need for a weapon cache system.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 35 queries.