Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
December 02, 2024, 09:53:56 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
General Discussion
>
no g43 on falls,why?
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: no g43 on falls,why? (Read 7202 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #20 on:
July 30, 2011, 09:29:18 pm »
g43's were really good on them thats the problem. i saw more falls with g43's and rifle nades than fg42's
Logged
Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #21 on:
July 30, 2011, 10:14:43 pm »
Thats because FG42's are overpriced.
Same with MP44 Stormies.
Logged
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #22 on:
July 31, 2011, 03:06:22 am »
so whats wrong with diversity of unit and more different army builds?
Actully I dont see all that much rifle nades on falls in game,they tend to be hit or miss,sometimes they will be very good,other times they wont do shit,thus I deselected them in 2 of my falls companys and I have used them extensivly! +100 games with them,and rly,lately,they dont do much.
Logged
Heartmann
Officer of Kindness
Posts: 1776
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #23 on:
July 31, 2011, 03:19:55 am »
I was akways against removong g43 from falls, and the fg 42 is overpriced imo
Logged
Quote from: EIRRMod on December 24, 2012, 04:19:41 pm
In the basement getting drunk.
Quote from: tank130 on March 31, 2013, 08:55:36 am
It's not really creepy until I show up.............
- I've heard of being an animal in bed but...
- The phallic principle of the Navy
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #24 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:14:10 pm »
bring back g43 to falls and remove rifle nades? i never see anyone with rifle nades anyway , people just fg42 now that there is no g43.
Logged
SaintPauli
EIR Veteran
Posts: 530
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #25 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:17:38 pm »
Quote from: AmPM on July 30, 2011, 10:14:43 pm
Thats because FG42's are overpriced.
Same with MP44 Stormies.
+1
G43 would rape because of priceing...
Logged
smurfORnot
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #26 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:30:12 pm »
Quote from: nugnugx on August 03, 2011, 03:14:10 pm
bring back g43 to falls and remove rifle nades? i never see anyone with rifle nades anyway , people just fg42 now that there is no g43.
go and watch smokaz,coy rly isnt all that good,but when you have 2 players who spam them,backed up with KCH,that's rly hard nut to crack.
Logged
Rocksitter
EIR Veteran
Posts: 495
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #27 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:36:17 pm »
With Improved Logistics the rifle nades are good without not so good...
I liked all the options on falls and the g43...
Logged
SaintPauli
EIR Veteran
Posts: 530
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #28 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:40:16 pm »
Quote from: smurfORnot on August 03, 2011, 03:30:12 pm
but when you have 2 players who spam them,backed up with KCH,that's rly hard nut to crack.
It’s like faceing BARs and Thomsons - except they also get modifiers vs. suppressed units….
(End the tyranny of suppression!!!)
Logged
Rocksitter
EIR Veteran
Posts: 495
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #29 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:48:47 pm »
Getting rid of all SF types could be a good idea...
Logged
DarkSoldierX
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #30 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:51:37 pm »
Noooooo! Don't take away my fg42/riflenade combo! noooooooooooo
Riflenade>g43
Logged
Quote from: nugnugx on June 03, 2011, 11:42:22 am
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
Quote from: BigDick on January 08, 2012, 06:47:44 am
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #31 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:54:28 pm »
Riflegrenades are win!
Logged
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
BigDick
Guest
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #32 on:
August 03, 2011, 03:56:07 pm »
Quote from: nugnugx on August 03, 2011, 03:14:10 pm
bring back g43 to falls and remove rifle nades? i never see anyone with rifle nades anyway , people just fg42 now that there is no g43.
imho the fg42 is overpriced (i personally use the falls only with default rifles) but thats not that bad since the fg42 improves with doctrine abilities (covering fire, +1 upgrade, remove of penalties of covering fire)
so it depends of your doctrine choice if it makes up the price or not
and the g43 on the other hand i don't know how much it would improve the dps (to lazy to calculate the dps for falls k98)
but yeah i don't think it would be op to have it as an option
Logged
PonySlaystation
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136
Re: no g43 on falls,why?
«
Reply #33 on:
August 03, 2011, 08:14:13 pm »
Quote from: Heartmann on July 31, 2011, 03:19:55 am
I was akways against removong g43 from falls, and the fg 42 is overpriced imo
Many upgrades are, especially those for elite infantry. There is a dire need for a weapon cache system.
Logged
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...