Katusha
|
« on: August 04, 2011, 06:36:02 pm » |
|
Can AB armor for falls come as a free upgrade? So you can choose it if you want on certain squads? Call it "light gear" or something, so you can pick it for squads that will be moving, and not pick it for squads that will be ambushing.
AB armor is really a degrade compared to soldier armor, and I wish there was an ability to keep soldier armor on some squads.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2011, 06:37:08 pm » |
|
+1
I'd like to have AB armor on my riflenade squads and soldier on my fg42s for instance
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Katusha
|
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2011, 06:40:49 pm » |
|
+1
I'd like to have AB armor on my riflenade squads and soldier on my fg42s for instance
thats what i want it for
|
|
« Last Edit: August 04, 2011, 07:26:04 pm by Katusha »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2011, 07:24:46 pm » |
|
+567890
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2011, 07:52:08 pm » |
|
We can probably look into it.
Personally I don't have any squads that I want Soldier armour on because I've got the Quick response Tier 4 and I spend most of my time running with FSJ TB's. the only time I stop is to fire and reload(no Reload while Sprinting) I only have 3 FG42 units in my company but I do wish they didn't get wrecked for standing still
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted! the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2011, 10:04:41 pm » |
|
To be fair I don't see why we need to use AB armor for it instead of just a modifier when moving that is the SAME as the bonus from AB, but this keeping the unique defenses of soldier armor.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2011, 10:15:52 pm » |
|
To be fair I don't see why we need to use AB armor for it instead of just a modifier when moving that is the SAME as the bonus from AB, but this keeping the unique defenses of soldier armor.
That sounds alot better, but the health bonus should be removed if that was done, and there would be some weird stuff with this. Like bars getting worse vs them, and snipers missing every now and then.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2011, 10:55:00 pm » |
|
That sounds alot better, but the health bonus should be removed if that was done, and there would be some weird stuff with this.
Like bars getting worse vs them, and snipers missing every now and then.
Happens when ab move as well
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2011, 11:51:20 pm » |
|
Happens when ab move as well
Yeah but then you would have super armour. Best of both worlds with no drawbacks. Something worth more than a t3.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2011, 11:51:52 pm » |
|
Hell yeah
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BigDick
|
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2011, 02:31:06 am » |
|
airbornes are 6 (50% more) men 75hp and that 0.5 recieved accuracy while moving
falls are 4 men 75hp and that 0.75 recieved accuracy while moving 0.75 recieved damage with that T3
to keep their soldier armor while just adding a modifier (where i'm not sure if its possible - afaik its not) would be more like: even up for 50% more men in AB squad by using that T3
|
|
« Last Edit: August 05, 2011, 02:53:56 am by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #11 on: August 05, 2011, 02:40:45 am » |
|
5 man fsj squads
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2011, 02:46:44 am » |
|
airbornes are 6 (50% more) men 75hp and that 0.5 recieved accuracy while moving
falls are 4 men 75hp and that 0.5 recieved accuracy while moving with that T3
to keep their soldier armor while just adding a modifier (where i'm not sure if its possible - afaik its not) would be more like: even up for 50% more men in AB squad by using that T3
AB have a hard time defending themselves, FJ do not.
|
|
|
Logged
|
. . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
BigDick
|
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2011, 02:56:37 am » |
|
if you use them vs infantry i agree they are no AI units because their upgrade is AT same is with falls that are no AT units and like u said "have a hard time to defend themself" the T3 unlock unit Tankbuster falls have "a hard time to denfend themself" (vs infantry) and even vs tanks because tanks ignore soldier armor
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spinn72
|
« Reply #14 on: August 05, 2011, 03:16:14 am » |
|
... All PE infantry fuckin sprint with no drawbacks afterwards!?!? Falls are strong enough as AI AND AT. FJ TB's are arguably the strongest AT inf in the game. If Airborne had 2 shreks, then this would be a valid discussion lawl.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2011, 03:49:21 am » |
|
All PE infantry fuckin sprint with no drawbacks afterwards!?!? why would there be drawbacks,it's not fire up ie. I can escape any supression ,if you get supressed or pinned,your fucked. How are FJ TB strongest? They are same as TD tankbusters more or less,with T3 they can sit in cover just like FJ can. why do you see ab blobs running around,but not FJ TB's blobs running around.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2011, 03:59:08 am » |
|
I see FJ blobs pretty regularly actually....Brn runs a sprint based FJ company.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2011, 04:05:36 am » |
|
FJ Tank buster blobs?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BigDick
|
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2011, 04:11:05 am » |
|
why would there be drawbacks,it's not fire up ie. I can escape any supression ,if you get supressed or pinned,your fucked. yeah and as u pointed out somewhere else that even has a drawback....they can't shoot while moving in own territory anymore that means a dps drop in trade for more mobility How are FJ TB strongest? They are same as TD tankbusters more or less,with T3 they can sit in cover just like FJ can.
exactly and vs the units they are meant as counter (because vehicles ignore their soldier armor type) they are worse then doubleshrek tankbusters....(60hp vs 80hp means tankbusters are 33.33% more durable vs vehicles while being cheaper and no T3 unit unlock - just a T2 for doubleshreks) falls-tankbuster become only worth it with doctrine abilities but arn't good on its own
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Katusha
|
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2011, 07:59:56 pm » |
|
This is for T3 Armor choice
If you think bottom T4 is OP gtfo and create your thread, but I'd suggest whoever does start that consider that FJ can't reload while sprinting.. and they are not durable at all, and they're a 4 man squad..you can kill them with a sherman after they fire the first salvo, unless there are 2 of them, in that case where's the rest of your shit?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|