*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 11:55:30 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [PE] Falls G43  (Read 9329 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Illegal_Carrot Offline
Global Moderator
*
Posts: 1068


« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2011, 07:33:38 pm »

it's my understanding that Falls were super OP with G43s
The high damage-per-shot and long-range capabilities of the G43 (versus the damage-per-second and close-range supremacy of the FG42), stacked with Ambush bonuses and doctrine unlocks in such a way that the G43s could WTF-pwn Allied infantry out of ambush like nothing else. This is why the option for G43s was removed.

Not because FJs already had 'too many options,' or because 'FJs are too good of a platform;' and any Allied fanboy who believes that is straight-up retarded (read: all of them).
Logged

Quote
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #21 on: October 04, 2011, 07:54:35 pm »

The high damage-per-shot and long-range capabilities of the G43 (versus the damage-per-second and close-range supremacy of the FG42), stacked with Ambush bonuses and doctrine unlocks in such a way that the G43s could WTF-pwn Allied infantry out of ambush like nothing else. This is why the option for G43s was removed.

Not because FJs already had 'too many options,' or because 'FJs are too good of a platform;' and any Allied fanboy who believes that is straight-up retarded (read: all of them).
False info unless Schdmit and Unknown have no idea what balance team decided.(which i doubt)

Because FJ were becoming cluttered and had far too many unlock options, they were literally able to do everything. Not to mention instant suppression from cloak is pretty retarded, Luft already gets the MG34 so FJ's have no need for G43's.
^ What schmidt said.
(High five)

Yeah, I like to remember things.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2011, 01:00:31 am »

Quote
You get 2 actual units other then the shreck on that T3, what is your basis of reasoning?

1 of those units is dead useless,aka flakvierling,88 is not bad IF player wants to use it,but since it's static and not everyone like to play that way. So if someone just wants shreck for falls,he needs to spend T3. It's like having ab T1(atg,mortar and mg) devided into 2 slots,lets put atg in T3 with something,and we may put mg and mortar to T2,and as T1 they might get some useless shit.
Logged
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #23 on: October 05, 2011, 06:17:58 am »

Ill be inclined to agree with smurf. Just becuase a unit gets too many upgrades, means it should be toned down? Rifleman with a t3 can get Greaseguns, zooks, and BARs, that 3. Without any doctrine choices falls get one main weapons- FG42. You with a t3, you get another entire platform for ONLY ANTI TANK. since id love to see a FSJTB sqaud face off with a a bar sqaud. So its like if stormies could be bought with dual shrecks already and you called them something else. But as smurf said i must spend an entire T3 to get just one unit, since the flakverling is junk useless and same goes for the 88. the t2 for g43s should also give falls the option. I never said make them cheap. 80 Muni for g43s on falls. Bam, problem solved
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.059 seconds with 35 queries.