Smokaz
Honoured Member
 Posts: 11418
|
|
« on: April 11, 2012, 02:03:20 am » |
|
can we add so that you can buy the lmgs on your normal ab riflemen as well? it would be nice
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 02:12:59 am by Smokaz »
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
 Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2012, 08:15:28 am » |
|
Wait thats like a T4 unlock?? AB with garands. No but LMGS i dont see them working very well they seem to have a short burst and seem weak compared to any other LMGS it has a longer range?!? we should have Hicks come over.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2012, 08:17:43 am » |
|
Airborne's a fuckin mess..
what would be the point of that? BARs are statistically quite better than that LMG.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2012, 08:26:15 am » |
|
So, any news on how that new AB doctrine that was soupposed to be worked on. whats the ETA???. we haz no toyz.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2012, 08:40:55 am » |
|
I thought the allied lmg was better vs soldier armor and heroic armor than the bar, is this wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2012, 08:47:43 am » |
|
idk seems pretty useless to me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2012, 08:47:55 am » |
|
That is true, with 2 reservations:
1. There are no axis units left in the game that have soldier armor
2. Heroic armor is great vs. everything but flames and nades, the difference is very small and only 2 axis units have this armor. KCH and the Wehr officer.
The advanatages are pretty much not there to warrant the LMG over the BAR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2012, 08:52:04 am » |
|
That is true, with 2 reservations:
1. There are no axis units left in the game that have soldier armor
2. Heroic armor is great vs. everything but flames and nades, the difference is very small and only 2 axis units have this armor. KCH and the Wehr officer.
The advanatages are pretty much not there to warrant the LMG over the BAR.
On to of that, the lmg eliminates your airborne armor advantage while in use. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2012, 08:59:38 am » |
|
So, i got a Question here. Idk how long the LMG has been in Airborne doctrine but Why was it bought in to begin with, i mean surely not every said lets implement a immobile weapon on a mobile armor system and platform?. I dont know just seems odd.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
deadbolt
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran Posts: 4410
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2012, 09:00:44 am » |
|
Tankedit: Enjoy your vacation
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 11:13:03 am by tank130 »
|
Logged
|
 DERDBERTLike Jesus, Keeps died for us
He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.
Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.
Keeps died for our funny threads.
|
|
|
3rdCondor
Donator
 Posts: 1536
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2012, 09:02:25 am » |
|
give airborne grease guns
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2012, 09:04:29 am » |
|
tankedit:
Fixed.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 11:16:32 am by tank130 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2012, 09:06:28 am » |
|
So, i got a Question here. Idk how long the LMG has been in Airborne doctrine but Why was it bought in to begin with, i mean surely not every said lets implement a immobile weapon on a mobile armor system and platform?. I dont know just seems odd.
Firesparks... It was a change made when only one person was capable of working and updating the mod. No separation of powers = someone can do whatever the hell he wants and we get changes like this.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2012, 09:14:01 am » |
|
Hmm, and it hasnt been modified since then to change the stats on it? or something since then?, hasnt the Airborne doctrine been worked on forever now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2012, 09:15:07 am » |
|
God forbid firesparks was here to make a patch
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2012, 09:20:10 am » |
|
Hmm, and it hasnt been modified since then to change the stats on it? or something since then?, hasnt the Airborne doctrine been worked on forever now.
If you had any comprehension of the magnitude of work it takes to get a doctrine draft agreed upon by all 3 development teams and coded then implemented, I think you would have alittle more sympathy. Current AB drafts do not have the LMG in them. God forbid firesparks was here to make a patch
Just cause firesparks has the scripts and the shiney button to "make a patch" did not give him the authority to be Designer, coder and balance team all at the same time. Anyone on the dev team can make a patch now, I can almost make a patch, its not the button that's the issue. Anywho, enough of that, its water under the bridge. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
