EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 11009
|
« on: June 27, 2012, 10:23:23 pm » |
|
Hey guys, I need screenshots. Like this: Please ALSO include the battle number. There is something screwy going on with my victory calculations, and I need proof.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shit I'm pretty sure you could offer the guy a cup of coffee and he'd try to kill you with the mug if you forgot sugar.
That's like offering Beer to fuck the fat chick. It will work for a while, but it's not gonna last. Not only that, but there is zero motivation for the Fat chick to loose weight.
Why don't you collect up your love beads and potpourri and find something constructive to do.
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2012, 02:28:00 pm » |
|
Battle 1475
|
|
|
Logged
|
9th Armoured Engineers
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2012, 02:36:09 pm » |
|
Whats the problem with that one? Overwhelming allied victory and the numbers match up correctly. You exceeded the Overwhelming victory margin and got an overwhelming victory?
In the one EiRRMod posted, they got an overwhelming defeat but didn't actually exceed the Margin in pts. Hence why that one is broken
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted! the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2012, 02:44:23 pm » |
|
Whats the problem with that one? Overwhelming allied victory and the numbers match up correctly. You exceeded the Overwhelming victory margin and got an overwhelming victory?
In the one EiRRMod posted, they got an overwhelming defeat but didn't actually exceed the Margin in pts. Hence why that one is broken
I thought we should just post a screen plus the coressponding battlenumber so that EIRRMod can evaluate the calculations for the battle result. *?*
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sach
|
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2012, 02:56:04 pm » |
|
I don't understand the relationship between player VP and overall VP. How does it work? Is high losses VP good or bad?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sach Wins! Would people please stop killing my AVREs. Not cool.
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2012, 02:56:53 pm » |
|
Bad
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2012, 04:02:09 pm » |
|
Battle: 1496 Like this. We got an overwhelming victory but didn't exceed 7500 pts difference.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2012, 04:48:35 pm » |
|
could it be either doubling it or counting the losses moddy?
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2012, 03:12:04 pm » |
|
here's one-battle number 1649
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2012, 07:44:01 pm » |
|
Battle 1710 Seems to only be unfairly judging allied defeats - had a game as axis where the points where consistent with the outcome. Should have screenshotted it though.
|
|
« Last Edit: June 29, 2012, 08:02:16 pm by Mysthalin »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2012, 08:08:46 pm » |
|
Myst even if you outpoint them if you actually lose the battle it calls it a narrow defeat
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2012, 08:59:22 pm » |
|
Not the point I'm making. Game assumed it was a regular defeat, crazy - when points say it should be narrow defeat. That's what I'm pointing out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2012, 09:36:14 pm » |
|
Gotcha. Haven't seen one of those didn't realize thats what it meant
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2012, 01:01:13 am » |
|
So this should be a regular victory not a narrow one? Battle 1732
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2012, 05:17:47 am » |
|
Make a post-game screenshot so we can see what the point differential was.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2012, 11:06:44 am » |
|
its attached?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2012, 01:20:37 pm » |
|
ah, I can't see attachments for some obscure reason... Still...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tankmaster23
|
« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2012, 01:49:17 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 11009
|
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2012, 04:38:54 pm » |
|
Ok, I have found the bug.
The territory points are being displayed incorrectly on the client side.
Currently, it is showing the x1 value.
It SHOULD be showing the xPlayers per side value.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lionel23
Donator
Posts: 1854
|
« Reply #19 on: July 04, 2012, 01:09:29 am » |
|
Here's one where it was a close game (2v3) yet it reports an overwhelming axis victory despite the difference being less than 300.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)
|
|
|
|