x2 Zooks for armor coy?

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[ALLiDOisWIN]

With pool costs on upgrades I could easily see double zooks work out.

Yeah you should see with balance team. Make the pool cost a lot or something. Because i would only use like 4 maybe 5.

[Poppi]

anyone try single zook with TR company for inf?

I ask b/c i dont see 55mu worth a zook for infantry due to it can be absolutely worthless at times.
yes yes good against LV. still take like 4+ zooks to kill a HT. 60 mu for a sticky that will mess up a tiger sounds better.

[lionel23]

TR doesn't really help the zook.  It improves accuracy but not penetration.  And the one zook is really overpriced on a fragile platform, which means you're throwing away your munitions.  There really is no reason NOT to get double zook rangers (tougher squad, more zooks to fight LVs, has fire-up and more health/better armor).  Throw a bunch of 1 zook riflemens at a squad of pumas and watch how quickly you die.

[Spartan_Marine88]

anyone try single zook with TR company for inf?

i find it sexy to be completely honest.

Because i use zook + smoke + nade. You get this well rounded assault squad that can deal with light vehicles.

[Smokaz]

I find zook rifles really good with TR. It's a can do unit, not a will do unit.

[nikomas]

I say bring back AT rifles tbh, I miss those things...
Were they inbalanced or something? I know Ami's mainly use zooks but hey, weapons have been given cross facition before

[CrazyWR]

this is a horrible idea fyi...PE will get even more raped by Armor company if they get double zooks.  One is more than sufficient to cause them plenty of trouble...

Armor is currently one of the most well-rounded balanced doctrines in EIR.  Why we are looking to upgrade/change it is beyond me.