This fucking thread started out as a random argument out of thin air then. Your point?
Ok lol like the people who made it cant be biased just because its made for the UN to review. 80% of the signatories are unfortunatly, most likely biased against cops in the first place. Irrelevant. Now, some of the cases are legit, I never denied that. But this is hardly the big system problem that you make it out to be. And again, if my statement is apparently "out of this air" and therefore is invalid, then the OP is invalid because it was posted out of thin air too.I am not saying it all doesn't mean anything. But there is enough of it that is trashy and easily tampered with that its safe to say the makers of the report were biased.
And my example isnt a "MIGHT" the source is pretty damn vague. Know who they asked for information? His lover.For the specific comment you are replying to, its obviously my argument that you are biased. You replyed in reality it is me being biased. Pretty damn obvious what I am talking about there. I wasn't talking in code or anything, I actually did say the word "bias" my argument, multiple times. Not my fault your smart enough to realize that.
So you're basically saying that everyone is biased and that you can't trust anything that is biased?
