Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 28, 2025, 11:18:16 pm
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Salutations, EIRR of 2024
by
Olazaika1
[March 22, 2025, 02:00:47 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Draken
[December 20, 2024, 02:52:42 am]
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Broadcasts & Replays
>
Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P) (Read 4226 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ranger_Spam
EIR Regular
Posts: 40
Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
on:
January 20, 2008, 04:04:41 pm »
Well i played a game tordajo+brad anderson+tharulerme vs aldog+pink tiger+me
Basicly 3 inf player we got owned and we couldn't do anything abut it. battle 1902 replay should be here soon
Logged
CaperPuts
EIR Regular
Posts: 42
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #1 on:
January 20, 2008, 04:13:36 pm »
Yeah, here's the replay. Somethnig has to be done. Infantry-Lol smgs, emplacements-lol fireup nades tanks- lol bazookas.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Logged
http://llamaguy.com/waffle.jpg
CommanderNewbie
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1240
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #2 on:
January 20, 2008, 04:46:39 pm »
There were a number of mistakes committed in the battle, but I won't dispute that 3 ranger companies (looked like at least 2 of them had tier 4s) is difficult to deal with.
What I really want to know is how much they had besides that.
Logged
CommanderNewbie - Allied
Prydefalcn - Axis
BradAnderson
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1233
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #3 on:
January 20, 2008, 05:03:10 pm »
hi, obv i took part in that battle and no only 1 of us had a tier 4 tharuleme.. also i did have quite alot obv because i put most of my RBs into manpower and munitions but none fuel therefore i have the ability 2 buy rangers as a replacement for riflemen which suck against everything also i had 4 shermans 18 rangers 3hmgs 2 engineers and 6 rifles in my company i like it that way as i know if i loose units... all i'm saying is if u nerf rangers or completly phase them out i guarentee nobody well except a few will still play allied as aliied tanks r paper thina nd can barely beat a puma also rifles cant beat volks let alone grens no matter what vet yes i know allied have pershings but how exspensive r they hmmmmmm? exactly a lot so nerfing rangers wont solve anything except from making a few whining axis happy for about 10mins until they find something else 2 moan about like mayb airbourne or any other decent unit in allies all i mean is allies run on elite units so by phasing them out would b big mistake.
Logged
RangerSpam
EIR Veteran
Posts: 80
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #4 on:
January 20, 2008, 05:14:32 pm »
Quote from: BradAnderson on January 20, 2008, 05:03:10 pm
hi, obv i took part in that battle and no only 1 of us had a tier 4 tharuleme.. also i did have quite alot obv because i put most of my RBs into manpower and munitions but none fuel therefore i have the ability 2 buy rangers as a replacement for riflemen which suck against everything also i had 4 shermans 18 rangers 3hmgs 2 engineers and 6 rifles in my company i like it that way as i know if i loose units... all i'm saying is if u nerf rangers or completly phase them out i guarentee nobody well except a few will still play allied as aliied tanks r paper thina nd can barely beat a puma also rifles cant beat volks let alone grens no matter what vet yes i know allied have pershings but how exspensive r they hmmmmmm? exactly a lot so nerfing rangers wont solve anything except from making a few whining axis happy for about 10mins until they find something else 2 moan about like mayb airbourne or any other decent unit in allies all i mean is allies run on elite units so by phasing them out would b big mistake.
airborne arent that gd considering they dont have smgs
Logged
CommanderNewbie
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1240
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #5 on:
January 20, 2008, 05:25:15 pm »
my god, punctuation is your friend. I can't even process that.
Logged
|-|Cozmo|-|
Lieutenant General of all Ninja's.
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4950
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #6 on:
January 20, 2008, 06:29:43 pm »
something about if you make rangers any weaker then they are (lolz?) then nobody will play as allies...
well thats complete Bullshit, rangers are not ment to be the main stay of an army, they are the elite.
and riflemen can be effective. if they have BAR's and stickies they can beat back most things.
And allied armour is not THAT bad, yes shermans loose to a PIV head to head, but that is not what tank battles are ment to be about, the allies have sticky bombs use them THEN throw the sherman in(duh).
Even with the fire up *nerf* its still HMG: lolz, fire up, nade or Axis inf: lolz, Vet 3 smg's or axis armour: lolz, fireup, zook to the ass.
Logged
acker
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #7 on:
January 20, 2008, 09:23:35 pm »
If you can't kite the Rifles...*sigh*. And, of course, the name "RangerSpam" really isn't biased at all.
See the thread that's three below this one.
Logged
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #8 on:
January 20, 2008, 09:24:59 pm »
Rangers are great, when used to enhance other infantry and your vehicles. They are not great as the only infantry unit in your army.
Logged
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
acker
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #9 on:
January 20, 2008, 09:32:37 pm »
Also, for some reason or other, this replay doesn't work. Can someone verify this?
Logged
fldash
Founder
Posts: 9755
Re: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)
«
Reply #10 on:
January 20, 2008, 09:33:34 pm »
I might have made a new release since this...
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...