RANGERS IDEA 2 FIX!

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[BradAxis]

i think rangers if have less avalibility and were reverted back to there origional state people would use them more tactically and b more careful with them this would stop the blobs and tharulermes whining

[Nevyen]

I like the idea.  Maybe looking at the unit from a restriction of availabilty.  reduce thier resupply so that they represent truly effective elite units but say look to see only say 6-8 and at a stretch 10 in a company? 

that could see them come back in versatility while not having the current nerf. 

[noskillzcheeseairbourne/ranger blobba]

good idea ..like any decent army list all elites should only ever be 10% not 90% ..i mean if allies can have rangers/airbourne/commandoes wheres the axis waffen ss /brandenburg/gebirgs equivilant?

[AmPM]

You really only need 2 call ins worth of rangers in the old style.

[Draygon]

Old style I had 3 calls ins, only 6 rangers in the company at a time.

[acker]

The devs really need to encourage people to use all of their companies.

Personally, I'm of the opinion that, if the devs manage to make using multiple companies more appealing, availability will balance itself out. After all, that's what most units were balanced out over, being available for three companies, not one.

For instance, having fifteen Rangers stretched across three companies is almost-worthless considering the CPs, but having 15 Rangers in one company is over-the-top.

And, of course, availability is being redone for 2.0.

[|-|Cozmo|-|]

redone/ removed .

[Days of War]

Old OLD style I had 6 rangers per company. And a half track and a triage center. =D