Sujections for the v0.3.5

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Draygon]

I agree that it was not a needed addition to the game, I saw 2x yesterday when this "ability" was used to deny the enemy the experience for the kill.  I like the idea of giving the ability to Engineers/Pios so that they have to first get to the tank and then scuttle it, not just let the player controlling the tank use it.  This will make them have to work somewhat at getting that population back that the tank is taking up, not just get it back for free.

Or just take it out of the game all together.

[salan]

The things that are BROKEN should be on the top of his list..

personally i don't care about 2.0 i've waited long enough, I want what im playing NOW fixed before something that may or may not come out in the future in a timely or forever far away time frame ...


skuttling isn't working, it is being abused...

[fldash]

Its fixed.  Calm down.  You guys are so temperamental. 'Christ almighty, it's like I'm sittin' here playing cards with my brother's kids or somethin', you nerve-wracking sons-of-bitches.'

[salan]

Dash, you can believe whatever ucross feeds ya, but there is a huge imbalance IN GAME with the version that is currently playing.

you guys don't want to hear it, we'll keep on slugging, but 2.0 really doesn't matter to any of us, we don't even know anything about it.

[fldash]

There is not a HUGE imbalance.  There are HUGE exaggerations going on though.  I see the statistics of units lost, wins and losses.  Ucross doesn't feed me anything, I can make my own conclusions.

[DasNoob]

We do know that it is a single resource which makes the 2-3 major balance changes Ucrosss pushes out each week moot.

[fldash]

Not necessarily.

[DBSights3]

yeah, thats not a good idea.  Single resource? Why? - looses a lot of hard work.

[salan]

they could have changed it all back, like i said noob we know NOTHING so why should we care?

[DasNoob]

Dash you need a someone to release press info to the community concerning all of the changes and direction to take some of the heat off of you and Ucross tbh.  Either that or just stop reading what is here lol.  It's poison  if you take it personal. 

[Razor]

Edit: remove this post akranadas posted in the wrong thread.

[DasNoob]

they could have changed it all back, like i said noob we know NOTHING so why should we care?

True enough.  We know what they want us to know.  And I hope too that they know that the lack of knowledge is what causes %50 of the pissy responses by the community.  That and the fact that so many people (not me) have been screwed on their doctrine/vet choices because of the huge changes that have been happening twice each week... in a war that was supposed to decide medals I might add.

[DasNoob]

Yeah i rather just play Axis. My company plans/setup got pretty destroyed with these changes, and i dont feel like vetting up another company.

Stickys: You want them to be less common, so there wont be that big of an risk factor of steamrolling rifles for axis vehicles? Because thats the first time that pops into my mind. Call me stupid/wrong i don't really care.

And yes, stickys are critical in eir with the repair rates, but so is the price for uses on the stickys atm, they simply arent viable on rifles because you cant reinforce. Reason why they arent viable with the current price for uses is; you have to get up close to the vehicles to get them off, most of the time you'll be shot at and lose men and im pretty sure you wont get 4 stickys off, maby 1 or 2, 3 in extreme cases, so, why pay for an upgrade(thats damn expensive) you want get the full benefit of?


And for suiciding riflemen. They have to "suicide" to get the stickys off, they need to get up close to a vehicle to use them and as i said most of the time they'll get shot at.  I think when most people buy an upgrade they intend to use it, if you have to run up close to a vehicle to use it, they'll do it. Same thing would've been said about fausts if they had the same range.

we've moved beyond the sticky arguments now m8.  What salan and I are talking about are much deeper.

[Loik]

im glad i sit this war out.

[Razor]

we've moved beyond the sticky arguments now m8.  What salan and I are talking about are much deeper.

Wops, wrong thread.

[fldash]

DasNoob, we read it because we value your opinions, however the amount of gross exaggerations and immaturity that's displayed in them disheartens us.

[fldash]

I'm going to spend some time right now trying to get the ability to sell back upgrades.

[Draygon]

Many of us would greatly appreciate that FL.

[DBSights3]

nice work fl- man.  Looks great.

[DasNoob]

DasNoob, we read it because we value your opinions, however the amount of gross exaggerations and immaturity that's displayed in them disheartens us.

I agree, and I don't think you need to put up with it, but I was not sure if you realized where the outbursts come from and It seems you do.  The outbursts should surly clam down with your attempts to have upgrade buybacks.  Thank you for hearing that; I know the community will see that and know you and Ucross really do care.

For anyone who continues to bitch about this... well their true colors will be shown and they will be seen as fringe idiots who will eventually be marginalized no matter how LONG they may have been around.