Stormtroopers+ Rangers

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Avalanche]

mp44s are much better than thompsons, but take into account how survivable ranger are so it evens out

then, they need to even up the price, i say 200 mun for 4 mp44 or 4 smg is reasonable, so somewhere along that line

[Unkn0wn]

Do you ever post anything that wouldn't favour the axis?

[Avalanche]

i am against the 30 second timer for airborne

[Wraith547]

See unlike storms I would be FORCED to pay for zooks, so it actually costs 260 munitions for smgs.

[snipes]

there is nothing that the allies need, look at the war........

[snipes]

no it cost 260 munitions for 2 bazookas and 4 smgs
note* the price for 4 mp44's are 340munitions
note* + the 300 munitions for 2 shreks
640 munitions for stormies like rangers

[snipes]

only slightly better,

[snipes]

it is technically impossible for stormies to get 4mp44's with shreks, but still just comparing,

[Avalanche]

snipe you should edit your post, rather than quadruple post...

[snipes]

well im just trying to keep it up so ppl actually do something,


also i would bet that the 2 rangersquads with smg's could beat the 1 stormie squad with mp44's and shreks, also the rangers could get nades, so basically the rangers 260 munitons + nade cost is > stormie with 4 mp44's and shreks

[WarLord51]

I do think that 44s should be cheaper.
Also snipes dont post replys 5 times in a row.