Results of ANTS removed...

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Nevyen]

You know if there is one thing the Current form of the EIR community is consistant in is proving everybodys assesment in it right.


The LOT OF YOU GROW UP

[Rocksitter]

                              Ban Spammers!!!!!!!!!!

 No just a joke but why not have a good game that you have to win with strategy not a gimmick or cheat.. Gets old quick because anyone can spam units but not anyone can win with a even play field , so I don't think GamerAndy is scared to lose Vets I think your scared to lose. thats why you or anyone play Spamshit....

[Bodybag2224-Armor]

Human nature is to win, and some natures require said naturer to use any nature to win said nature.

[acker]

What's wrong with spamming snipers? It's a legitimate way to fight, isn't it? And it's balanced (I hope)...

People seem to have issues with playing against nonconformist enemies in ANY game out there.

[Dbozbrown]

Its fair to fight, but is it fun?  I play this game for fun personally, and I know that personally, my Company(Heavily armored) would destroy a sniper spam army.  Does that mean I would want to play that company?  No.  I play this game for fun and because I love World War II.  "Sniper spam" was not a tactic in WWII, it is not fun to play against, and in my opinion, a company like that has no place in a comunity as small as EiR.  People have the right to use those companys, but they shouldnt complain when people do not want to play with or agaisnt them.

[Bodybag2224-Armor]

You mean a game is meant to be fun? That doesn't make any sense 

[muha2]

I love when people speak of "tactics and strategies" in games.

The game does not allow enoguh space to really do tactics. All you got is traps, flanking, arti and the occasional german ambush.

[Rocksitter]

Its fair to fight, but is it fun?  I play this game for fun personally, and I know that personally, my Company(Heavily armored) would destroy a sniper spam army.  Does that mean I would want to play that company?  No.  I play this game for fun and because I love World War II.  "Sniper spam" was not a tactic in WWII, it is not fun to play against, and in my opinion, a company like that has no place in a comunity as small as EiR.  People have the right to use those companys, but they shouldnt complain when people do not want to play with or agaisnt them.

 Well put..

[DasNoob]

Gamer Andy is in a 3v3 with MountainMan and ForceMan4077.  I get in with Donnie Dark and Armegeggond i think was his name and they leave...

Amazing 1st day of ANTS removed and people already continue to prove why it was needed in the first place... 

I was told GamerAndy was the one that didn;t wanna play me and it caused the 3v3 to empty out aND they recreated one.... 

simply amazing. 

Its like people screening their calls against a crediter, cheers to players saying... I can beat him and him and him lets play, oh wait, might lose to him or him, lets all bail.....

Oh icing on the cake, a couple posts down forceman stared a thread "Petition to have ANTS removed".....

I dont know about you guys but this darn system has cost me coutless hours of play time. Please turn this system off. Sign here if you agree with me.

Without it it loks to still be costing u hours when u choose not to play ppl

Definition of Ironic: http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php/topic,5530.0.html

It's not your playing ability that people don't want to deal with, trust me.  Its your generally crap attitude.

[bajsporf]

What a bunch of whiners! It's just a game and if you don't think it's fun to play something the game allows then move on. Puddin is actully doing you a favor, EIR is in development and showing the devs that 30 flametracks or 15 snipers is something that might break the game is good. But back on topic removal of ANTS is good, atleast once someone left a game we got started  sanctioned by ANTS and all so it doesn't "solve" stacking it only makes the stackers having one of then creating a bunch of new companies.

Seriously untill an automatch feature can be implemented not allowing everyone to play everyone to maximize the amount of games will only hurt EIR. Personally I play to win, which is what I find fun but all you playing for "fun" whiners must understand that playing a "boring" game is better then not playing at all.

[GamerAndy]

What a bunch of whiners! It's just a game and if you don't think it's fun to play something the game allows then move on. Puddin is actully doing you a favor, EIR is in development and showing the devs that 30 flametracks or 15 snipers is something that might break the game is good.

I can't help but think you're new to the mod, cause if you'd played for a while you'd realize that its common knowledge spam companies tend to break the game.    All gimmick players like the op do is break the cost balance and get useful support weapons raised in cost and pop

For an example of this, look at the Quad halftrack and its cost 2 months ago compared to its cost now - that was from people like puddin and drnick spamming them - Now people very rarely use them and the halftrack is more expensive, without any upgrades, than an m8 armored car

[Unkn0wn]

*cough* availability :/.

[octide-ally]

*cough* /signed

until then though i think that in the best interest of the mod people should refrain from extreme usage of certain units.

[Dbozbrown]

What a bunch of whiners! It's just a game and if you don't think it's fun to play something the game allows then move on. Puddin is actully doing you a favor, EIR is in development and showing the devs that 30 flametracks or 15 snipers is something that might break the game is good. But back on topic removal of ANTS is good, atleast once someone left a game we got started  sanctioned by ANTS and all so it doesn't "solve" stacking it only makes the stackers having one of then creating a bunch of new companies.

Seriously untill an automatch feature can be implemented not allowing everyone to play everyone to maximize the amount of games will only hurt EIR. Personally I play to win, which is what I find fun but all you playing for "fun" whiners must understand that playing a "boring" game is better then not playing at all.

So if I dont like one thing that the game allows, than I shouldnt play all together?  How about I just dont play people that exploit what the game allows?

Your logic makes no sense.

[Dragon93]

lol, so many people wanted Ants removed, now they want it back. Omg, make up your mind. I managed to get a game up pretty quick without ANTs, no waiting for people with the right percentage.

[Thtb]

Nah dramaqueens 1-3 want it back or at least complain about the lack off asskissing.

[Schultz]

I miss the ALLIED PLAYER  vs AXIS PLAYER thing, its hard to find games, as people chicken out easily and are picky as shity as far as joining a game.
Its good to have got rid of the % but the anonymity didnt had to go.
It could simulate an automatch, because you woudnt know who you were fighting if you join a full game and the opposition couldnt also, at least not everyone.

So overally i think that would be the best, bring back anonymity without the % getting in our way like now.

[Evilnrg]

I want NO Ants but that the players are still hidden
but that has a negative piont too

[Dragon93]

Its kind of pointless having the players hidden when you then go into vent and say "Everyone from the 3v3 go to battle 4" or somethingl ike that. Because you know who your playing. Anyway, i want my enemies to have names, i want to know who i kill .

[octide-ally]

I miss the ALLIED PLAYER  vs AXIS PLAYER thing, its hard to find games, as people chicken out easily and are picky as shity as far as joining a game.
Its good to have got rid of the % but the anonymity didnt had to go.
It could simulate an automatch, because you woudnt know who you were fighting if you join a full game and the opposition couldnt also, at least not everyone.

So overally i think that would be the best, bring back anonymity without the % getting in our way like now.

you are missing the most important point of an automatching system: making sure that the game is fun for both sides!!

... so no this would not simulate automatch, it would just be stackers paradise.

and noone would ever join a 0v3 then anyways unless they had their own stacked team hopping in.