*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2024, 08:45:34 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Modern Tanks  (Read 20050 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
sgMisten Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 778


« Reply #80 on: March 13, 2009, 10:25:09 pm »

If we keep adding legs it becomes an armoured caterpillar, in which case it'll basically become treads. Talk about reinventing the wheel eh.
Logged
Warlight Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 304


« Reply #81 on: March 14, 2009, 01:18:15 am »

Actualy, all the "western" tanks except the challenger you the same German Smooth Bore cannon.  And the Westernized asians us that gun as well (Korea and Japan). 

While the challanger and the Leoperd are considered good tanks.  The Abrams and the Isreali Merkava (sp?) are probubly the top ranked tanks in the world, only because they have seen combat.

Though the Abrams has an new upgrade, the SEP, forgot what it stands for.  And the Merkeva has a built in morter to bother infantry with. 

On a side note the Koreans have the most expensive tank and the world, the XK2 Black panther, and the Japanese have their new Type 10 and Type 90.  All three use conventional armor.

The Type 90 is considered a little better than the Leapord 2 by some, I think it has better electronics.  And the Type Ten is considered (by some) to have the most advanced electronics and C4 system (Like social networking for tanks).  However, this is all opinion And sicne all the above tanks use the same gun, the only things that very are armor, electronics and crew.  Crew being the biggest variable. 

As far as walking tanks go, they don't make sence.  While you become more mobile, you become a bigger target, You sit higher, Legs have more stress point than whiles and treds as well.  Even though we have the tech to make walking machines now, we don't have the materials to do it.  I think we'll see powered armour suits for soildiers before we see wide spread use of walking tanks. 

EDit: I forgot, that most of the really new tanks have active suspentions too, they can sit higher or lower or corcker and lean and stuff.  The abrams and the Challenger and the leapord don't have those options yet... id on't think.

And mechwarrior sized mechs don't make sense at all.  In mechwarrier, the mechs are made out of ridiculum and can only be killed by other mechs.  In the real world, we have plenty of man portable Anti-armor.  Heck one panzershrek to the leg...


 
« Last Edit: March 14, 2009, 01:22:02 am by Warlight » Logged
Hydro Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 242


« Reply #82 on: March 14, 2009, 07:55:24 am »

While the challanger and the Leoperd are considered good tanks.  The Abrams and the Isreali Merkava (sp?) are probubly the top ranked tanks in the world, only because they have seen combat.
Ye but Merakava was projected for Israel type off terrain and to fight in Gaza or Palestine, in another place and another enemy it wouldn't be so effective
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.054 seconds with 36 queries.