| TymTest
|
|
« Reply #20 on: January 28, 2009, 02:58:26 pm » |
|
You do know that there was no such thing as a Berge Tiger ?
Anyway, this update sounds great, I'm looking forward to being able to play PE again!
ever heard of google and wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergetigerit was real though not really denoted by the germans. It more than likely was a test bed that failed like a lot of tiger engines did so they didn't use it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #21 on: January 28, 2009, 03:05:46 pm » |
|
It's also important that EIRR goes through an extensive testing period for just pricing and veterancy, getting the game sufficiently balanced, before applying doctrines on top of that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Hydro
|
|
« Reply #22 on: January 28, 2009, 03:07:31 pm » |
|
Unfortunately, yes, there just isn't anyway to get the doctrines done in time. Many of the doctrines currently in EIR are imbalanced and it's best to start with a fresh slate.
Gah I was expecting it. For some brits doctrines it's hard add something new without changing design.But it's not hard to playing brits without docs, only problem would be with PE (lack of arty, support teams etc). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #23 on: January 28, 2009, 03:08:13 pm » |
|
PE is pretty fun  . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Hydro
|
|
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2009, 03:13:16 pm » |
|
PE is pretty fun . But with fallshirjagers and fixed henshel is more fun |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PrivateJson
|
|
« Reply #25 on: January 28, 2009, 03:15:50 pm » |
|
You do know that there was no such thing as a Berge Tiger ?
Anyway, this update sounds great, I'm looking forward to being able to play PE again!
ever heard of google and wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergetigerit was real though not really denoted by the germans. It more than likely was a test bed that failed like a lot of tiger engines did so they didn't use it. Well, I'm a WWII history buff, and it wasn't a Berge Tiger. As correctly written on wikipedia (which isn't always facts), it was more likely a vehicle used to place explosives! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fldash
Founder
 Posts: 9755
|
|
« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2009, 03:16:37 pm » |
|
Fallschirmjaegers are in... doctrine units are in, just not doctrine abilities...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fldash
Founder
Posts: 9755
|
|
« Reply #27 on: January 28, 2009, 03:17:27 pm » |
|
Yes, the crane on the 'Berge' wasn't strong enough to lift a tank... It's just a novelty.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| TymTest
|
|
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2009, 07:48:00 pm » |
|
Yes, the crane on the 'Berge' wasn't strong enough to lift a tank... It's just a novelty.
didn't say it was actually used like in coh...just saying it was real or assumed to be real, they had to get the idea from somewhere. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EscforrealityTLS
|
|
« Reply #29 on: January 29, 2009, 05:15:01 am » |
|
Hmmm, how will the Bergetiger vet up or will it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pwanawan baby!
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #30 on: January 29, 2009, 05:15:46 am » |
|
Same way kettenkrads vet up, surviving . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EscforrealityTLS
|
|
« Reply #31 on: January 29, 2009, 05:19:51 am » |
|
Ha ha thanks man, I guess the follow up will be, what if anything will said vet do? For either mentioned unit? If you can say of course.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Schultz
|
|
« Reply #32 on: January 29, 2009, 05:23:22 am » |
|
Same way kettenkrads vet up, surviving . Escape we can test that on the battlefield  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #33 on: January 29, 2009, 05:24:14 am » |
|
You'll get to see soon enough Esc =).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EscforrealityTLS
|
|
« Reply #34 on: January 29, 2009, 05:28:43 am » |
|
Haha Ketten spam FTW! "No prisoners, no survivors!"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| MannfredvonRitter
|
|
« Reply #35 on: January 29, 2009, 06:42:47 am » |
|
Just wondering:
Do you feel that removing the repair ability from PE may lead to imbalances against the PE? Being that they rely so heavily upon vehicles and avoid so heavily panzer grenadiers.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Schultz
|
|
« Reply #36 on: January 29, 2009, 07:43:11 am » |
|
That does seem harsh..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stumpster
Honoured Member
Posts: 2197
|
|
« Reply #37 on: January 29, 2009, 06:23:35 pm » |
|
Just wondering:
Do you feel that removing the repair ability from PE may lead to imbalances against the PE? Being that they rely so heavily upon vehicles and avoid so heavily panzer grenadiers.....
We aren't removing the repair ability from Panzer Grenadiers, only from Tank Busters and Assault Grenadiers. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Step out of the way. He'll keep going until he hits a wall, that being Akranadas. Let him go unmolested, his journey will take less time. |
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #38 on: January 29, 2009, 06:59:12 pm » |
|
Are you reducing the cost of PGrens to compensate for the fact they'll be spending most of their time repairing instead of fighting?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
| Skaevola2
|
|
« Reply #39 on: January 29, 2009, 07:07:39 pm » |
|
Are you reducing the cost of PGrens to compensate for the fact they'll be spending most of their time repairing instead of fighting?
Why would they do that? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
