Hydro
|
« on: February 25, 2009, 12:49:08 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2009, 12:50:02 pm » |
|
I think the synergy between PE & Wehr is superior to US+Brits.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MorkaandBorka
|
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2009, 12:53:57 pm » |
|
whatcha talking about Unknown you weirdo, The brits and americans are great together...
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm really bad - Smokaz
|
|
|
Hydro
|
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2009, 12:56:36 pm » |
|
I think the synergy between PE & Wehr is superior to US+Brits.
First game was double wehr with hummel. Paks are really pain in the ass, btw in second replay nice duel, avre vs marder
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Duckordie
Community Mapper
Posts: 1687
|
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2009, 01:11:07 pm » |
|
Unkown Pe is the worse side. They are just bad, and are no good The mortar halftack is ok, but the flame you can walk away from and heal up from. PE has no accepted strength to EiR. Eaven a Stuart > The PE P4
And The Jagedpanther is greate, the Problem is that its hard to micro. The secon you let it control it self, it start spinning and targeting any Vec near and this make it spin around and opens shoots for Sides and rear.
I Feel the Armor cars and healing Scout truck is the best unit Armor cat with support and Scout car as mobile healing (My opinion one of the best unit in game)
I just tryed to bloob 3 birts rifles with 2 grens and 1 brengun. And a captain They owned 3 Mp44 3 rifles and 1 G43.
|
|
|
Logged
|
^<-- Duck ™ and ©
We need more axis players!:
|
|
|
Sach
|
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2009, 01:30:18 pm » |
|
Reasons PE are sweet
mortar half track marders G43s mortar half track armoured cars mortar half track AT HTs
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sach Wins! Would people please stop killing my AVREs. Not cool.
|
|
|
Mysthalin_Axis
|
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2009, 01:34:06 pm » |
|
Eaven a Stuart > The PE P4
I'm daring you to give me a replay of a PE P4 losing to a Stuart. No support from either side. If you pull it off, I'll give you a penny. Though I doubt it, seeing as a much more armored tetrarch loses to a much less AT firepower wielding ostwind. I've seen 2 PE P4s destroy an M10 - front armor, however i've not seen 2 Ostwinds kill an M10, not even rear armor. And I doubt it's possible.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Duckordie
Community Mapper
Posts: 1687
|
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2009, 01:37:31 pm » |
|
Rangers will Kill eavry thing you posted Also Birts with fireup will also kill that list
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Duckordie
Community Mapper
Posts: 1687
|
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2009, 01:39:34 pm » |
|
Eaven a Stuart > The PE P4
I'm daring you to give me a replay of a PE P4 losing to a Stuart. No support from either side. If you pull it off, I'll give you a penny. Though I doubt it, seeing as a much more armored tetrarch loses to a much less AT firepower wielding ostwind. I've seen 2 PE P4s destroy an M10 - front armor, however i've not seen 2 Ostwinds kill an M10, not even rear armor. And I doubt it's possible. Its was a Stuart from the Commandos, its circled the PE P4 and the turret rotation is to slow for that small fast moving tank
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2009, 01:39:51 pm » |
|
I agree I should post the game from yesterday against apex. My sniper had like 60 kills. We survived Jagd + Panther rush combo. And triage is also great combined with brits.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin_Axis
|
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2009, 01:46:16 pm » |
|
do not even compare a puny, absolutely worthless, stuart to the unrivaled epic that is a tetrarch. Seriously, just dont.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2009, 01:55:33 pm » |
|
G43's 'slow' effects is the bane of all veteran infantry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Duckordie
Community Mapper
Posts: 1687
|
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2009, 01:59:18 pm » |
|
Unkown
Bar Supres > G43 "slow" Its good to stop the rangers fire up tho
Is slow they can keep shooting
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2009, 02:00:41 pm » |
|
Did you read what I said? It's great for killing high vet units as they can't retreat. I never made any comparison to BAR suppression .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sach
|
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2009, 02:42:06 pm » |
|
Rangers will Kill eavry thing you posted Also Birts with fireup will also kill that list
fuck i wondered why i keep loosing as PE, its cos the enemy bring out a ranger squad. oh no wait i've not lost yet...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2009, 04:50:05 pm » |
|
Rangers own PE.
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2009, 04:53:10 pm » |
|
lol, i love it when i see a couple PE assualt dudes rush a thompson armed ranger squad.. its like mmmmmmmmmm food!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2009, 08:44:29 pm » |
|
Eaven a Stuart > The PE P4
I'm daring you to give me a replay of a PE P4 losing to a Stuart. No support from either side. If you pull it off, I'll give you a penny. Though I doubt it, seeing as a much more armored tetrarch loses to a much less AT firepower wielding ostwind. I've seen 2 PE P4s destroy an M10 - front armor, however i've not seen 2 Ostwinds kill an M10, not even rear armor. And I doubt it's possible. Its was a Stuart from the Commandos, its circled the PE P4 and the turret rotation is to slow for that small fast moving tank Learn to turn your tank with the strafe. I can keep up with a circle strafing stuart/tet with a freaking tiger, and you can't do the same with a P4? If you can't micro, its not the fault of the faction....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2009, 09:53:05 pm » |
|
lulz gamesguy...very true.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
|