| Hicks359
|
|
« on: April 07, 2009, 02:48:10 pm » |
|
If this has been posted before, feel free to lock/delete as appropriate, but in case anybody missed this...  Seems the Brit lads are getting some lovin' Bring on the extra light armour. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2009, 03:00:02 pm » |
|
? yeah, the staghound can replace the cct and the kangaroo the cromwell
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| EliteGrens
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2009, 03:00:27 pm » |
|
Not really extra, you'll have to replace the Cromwell and Command tank to use the Kangaroo and Staghound.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2009, 03:01:08 pm » |
|
yeah, apparently.
Though, the staghound had better replaced the stuart, because if it replaces the CCT, how are brits gonna get a firefly? With no CCT to build and open up the requirement?
Ghm...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1852
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2009, 03:12:53 pm » |
|
Kangoroo is the answer?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Leafedge
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2009, 03:22:23 pm » |
|
I would think they would just have the CCT or its replacement meet the requirement...makes sense, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2009, 03:27:32 pm » |
|
yeah, because Fireflies rely heavily on staghounds(greyhound equivilents) on being commisioned onto the battlefield...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGrens
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2009, 03:41:47 pm » |
|
Yes, Staghound unlocks firefly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Hicks359
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2009, 12:31:45 pm » |
|
Erm, the point of the thread was that the description of the Armour Command Truck had the extra vehicles noted down for unlocking while the game was still in it's 2.400 state.
*Facepalm*
On a different note, i do not have ToV yet, but methinks i'll buy it Friday when i get moolah.
Simply cause those Airbourne look fun. >.>
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Guderian
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2009, 04:16:15 pm » |
|
The falaise pocket really seems to get little attention.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Eir customer support staff.
|
|
|
| Hicks359
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2009, 07:44:26 pm » |
|
Well i've simply never played Axis online.
Ever.
It's a matter of principle, i've used em in single player and appreciated some of the units, but i've never taken to the Axis tech enough to warrant playing them multi, thus my interest for them in the Single is also low.
Hell, i only played the OMG campaign because i disliked having a campaign unfinished.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2009, 06:56:48 am » |
|
Falaise Pocket was easily the worst of the 3.
Heck, I found it so bad that I didn't even bother finishing it, just a terrible map imo.
Run around the map 'waking up' 14 garrisons, then having to defend against annoying waves of vehicle spams looking for 'hidden tanks'.
Bleeeeh, shitty.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2009, 01:39:19 pm » |
|
it was pretty retarded unknown... I actualy finished it, and it got better at the end - it had a more gripping story than the other two campaigns - more heroic, but it was absolute shit in gameplay  . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| stickymaps
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2009, 12:09:49 am » |
|
the new patches made PE guite a bit more ineffective than before
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Hicks359
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2009, 05:06:40 am » |
|
I'll be honest.
I just want that M18 Hellcat as it looks reet.
Is it actually any good, or does it perform like a backwards Sherman/Cromwell?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Prydain
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2009, 06:30:43 am » |
|
I'll be honest.
I just want that M18 Hellcat as it looks reet.
Is it actually any good, or does it perform like a backwards Sherman/Cromwell?
The Hellcat is an easier to hit M10, nothing more. It does benefit having a .50 but that costs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 The Germans in Greek Are sadly to seek; Not five in five score, But ninety-five more; All, save only Hermann, And Hermann's a German. |
|
|
| Sach
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 13, 2009, 07:25:06 am » |
|
it also has a lower penetration ability than the m10 but makes up for it with a pretty sick ambush mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sach Wins!  Would people please stop killing my AVREs. Not cool.
|
|
|
sgMisten
Donator
Posts: 778
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2009, 08:57:48 am » |
|
I'll be honest.
I just want that M18 Hellcat as it looks reet.
Is it actually any good, or does it perform like a backwards Sherman/Cromwell?
Off topic, but this statement reminded me of an EiRR game not too long ago when I drove a Pz4 backwards into a Firefly to kill it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
