*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 09:41:18 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]

[May 26, 2022, 10:13:22 am]
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Eir needs more infantry  (Read 23222 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Poppi Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1080


« Reply #20 on: June 30, 2012, 01:42:01 pm »

God, it just pains me to see Nug post....... and he is right......

We kinda screwed the game with all the repairs and cheap vehicles. Tanks should be rare, not the core of a company.

i would like to see more variety of infantry. but also medium tanks.
Im no fan of heavies in a game. 20 shots later and tiger is half dead. Combine that with some other heavies and maybe an 88 and shreks or heavy inf... its basically going to roll over anything.

medium tanks have that right balance as in they can trump inf units but they arent god. Few good hits and they are done for. Then comes the heavies and throw a wrench in the whole balanced inf vs med tank fights.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #21 on: June 30, 2012, 01:46:26 pm »

i would like to see more variety of infantry. but also medium tanks.
Im no fan of heavies in a game. 20 shots later and tiger is half dead. Combine that with some other heavies and maybe an 88 and shreks or heavy inf... its basically going to roll over anything.

medium tanks have that right balance as in they can trump inf units but they arent god. Few good hits and they are done for. Then comes the heavies and throw a wrench in the whole balanced inf vs med tank fights.

WTF are you talking about?

Tiger has what, 1000hp, AT 150 damage per ATG shot. You can literally kill it with a single M18....

Panther has 700HP.

All I see in your post is the usual crying about Axis. L2P
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #22 on: June 30, 2012, 01:50:44 pm »

And armor really scares you that much, go some heavy AT doctrine, like RE... Every shot a 17pdr takes at a heavy goes "Troll... Troll... APDS troll..."
Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #23 on: June 30, 2012, 02:24:02 pm »

need more tanks, more fun
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #24 on: June 30, 2012, 03:24:18 pm »

WTF are you talking about?

Tiger has what, 1000hp, AT 150 damage per ATG shot. You can literally kill it with a single M18....

Panther has 700HP.

All I see in your post is the usual crying about Axis. L2P

20 shots later even if they all pounce the Tiger would be rather dead. 87.5 per 57mm pounce totals of 1750 damage. Only thing that can survive that is KT as it has more health than most of the others (excludes maus).

Mediums are garbage which is why Heavy is more appealing.

Why would I want a P4 that is not only slow, bad armor, expensive, medicore at everything when I can have a faster panther, with one of the best ingame armors and better range and higher damage? Expensive yes but has easier time to make up its cost than P4.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Nug Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394



« Reply #25 on: June 30, 2012, 03:29:08 pm »


Why would I want a P4 that is not only slow, bad armor, expensive, medicore at everything when I can have a faster panther, with one of the best ingame armors and better range and higher damage? Expensive yes but has easier time to make up its cost than P4.

Pricing changed everything.

Back in the day panther was more expensive and used more pop, you could have only 2 without anything else  or buy 6 p4s or 8 stugs, so we actualy could see more medium tanks because you could have a lot of them.

Today i can have 3 panthers and 2 stugs lol, so it's a no brainer no one will take 6 p4s if he can have 3 panthers and a p4 or 2 stugs.

« Last Edit: June 30, 2012, 03:31:59 pm by Nug » Logged
hans Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3497



« Reply #26 on: June 30, 2012, 03:41:07 pm »

i would like to see more variety of infantry. but also medium tanks.
Im no fan of heavies in a game. 20 shots later and tiger is half dead. Combine that with some other heavies and maybe an 88 and shreks or heavy inf... its basically going to roll over anything.


 Cry Lips sealed Grin i loled hard.

Hellcat beats tiger alone, 88s, just avoid them, shreks? oh really lol KCH bhaaaaahahaaaaahaaaaaahahaaaaaahaaaaaha haaaaahaaaaahahaaaaaaaaa

ugh
Logged



Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #27 on: June 30, 2012, 03:47:31 pm »

 all infantry is for is capping recrewing.

Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
Nug Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394



« Reply #28 on: June 30, 2012, 03:50:17 pm »

all infantry is for is capping recrewing.


that's only because the current metagameplay has created them for this.


AB spam with RRs meant something when you could drop waves after waves of them with increased pen and dmg, tigers used to run away,  nowdays RRs bounce of panthers rear lmao, and you use 3 waves of them and you are out of MU.
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #29 on: June 30, 2012, 03:58:04 pm »

good, spam blob is noob tactics.
Logged
Ahnungsloser Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1447



« Reply #30 on: June 30, 2012, 04:05:43 pm »

But a lot of games are won with it.
Logged

9th Armoured Engineers
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #31 on: June 30, 2012, 04:17:06 pm »

noobs, noobs everywhere
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #32 on: June 30, 2012, 04:20:49 pm »

thats true nug, RRS will penetrate everything from under a panther but mahn when a panther shows his ass its just as good as his front.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #33 on: June 30, 2012, 04:34:10 pm »

thats true nug, RRS will penetrate everything from under a panther but mahn when a panther shows his ass its just as good as his front.

I actually think the rear pen modifier is 3+ and they probably get a damage bonus.

Never have trouble with heavies as Allies, then again, I use TDs.

TD's changed everything, there used to be much less of them, so Panzer IVs had a role. Now they just die to the first vehicle with a gun that comes along.
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #34 on: June 30, 2012, 04:56:32 pm »

P4's still have a role and provide them very well  they bounce more shots then shermans and cromwells. they may not be able to defeat a sherman upgun but a regular sherman i believe they will beat.


I regularly see demon,windcries mary and other players get quite a few kills. in my opinion i think shermans have a harder time since schreks and storms and the such are nice counters and do very good damage against shermans, where as a ranger squad wont penetrate the front and will have to flank and stickies are only good at vet2 .
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #35 on: June 30, 2012, 04:59:23 pm »

aeroblade speaks the truth. I can properly play my old p4 spam again..

oh noes! i am a noob!
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18377


« Reply #36 on: June 30, 2012, 06:13:38 pm »

Personally I prefer the more tank-centric gameplay of EIRR over for example the EIR days of 10k manpower. Though I wouldn't entirely object to a small decrease in overall fuel. Sometimes games tend to revolve a little too much about AT, essentially watering down gameplay to 'kill all their ATs to win the game'. (Because it takes a lot of skill, and patience, to field medium tanks effectively. Only when you wear out the massive AT options on the table do they generally stand a good fighting chance)

It's all about personal preferences though, some people will prefer more infantry centric gameplay where as others will prefer the vehicle game more.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2012, 06:15:12 pm by Unkn0wn » Logged
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #37 on: June 30, 2012, 06:19:09 pm »

I don't like it when you make sense Deadbolt. It scares me.

Why cant you just put a silly picture and invoke the wrath of the mods resulting in lulz?

>.>

people forget i actually know what im about on about in coh and that im not just a forum troll... trolling and dodging a ban is harder than arguing with half the spastics on this forum ^^, plus trolling is alot more fun that arguing til im blue in the face.

Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
Jodomar Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 734


« Reply #38 on: June 30, 2012, 06:37:56 pm »

I don't know man, I've seen one vet 3 hvap sherman take on 3 p4's and win. At the end of the fight one AT gun did manage to help out on the last two p4's but the sherman did most of the work. I feel that shermans are a little bit easier to vet then p4's are.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #39 on: June 30, 2012, 06:42:53 pm »

I miss that Sherman. But yes, Shermans > P4 by far.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 34 queries.