*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 13, 2024, 08:02:02 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]

[May 26, 2022, 10:13:22 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: What still needs to be implemented?  (Read 2741 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« on: March 20, 2009, 10:28:18 am »

What's actually in EIR:R so far? And what -still- needs to be implemented?
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
salan Offline
Synergies TL2 mod!
*
Posts: 6290


« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2009, 10:30:41 am »

the advantages page will be out shortly.   Would have been out earlier this week but there was a delay.
Logged

Killer344 Offline
The Inquisitor
*
Posts: 6904



« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2009, 11:01:25 am »

*Meeting engagements still need to be implemented*
Logged

If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
salan Offline
Synergies TL2 mod!
*
Posts: 6290


« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2009, 11:04:12 am »

its called Europe In Ruins: reinforcements.. Foo!
Logged
EscforrealityTLS Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 593



« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2009, 11:07:21 am »

Actually also having upfront meeting engagements would be really nice as a fourth battle type.

Mmmmm flavour!

Oh oh and non-counting 1v1's as well would be sweet.
Logged

Pwanawan baby!
Killer344 Offline
The Inquisitor
*
Posts: 6904



« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2009, 11:08:38 am »

Go and play a 3vs3 with two noobs, if you´re last you can pretty much say GG before spawning, it´s impossible to tidy up 8 minutes of continous failure from your teammates lol.
Logged
salan Offline
Synergies TL2 mod!
*
Posts: 6290


« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2009, 11:13:06 am »

I personally love the meeting engagements, but its not on the 004 to do list.

I'll push for it soon!
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18377


« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2009, 05:53:43 am »

Go and play a 3vs3 with two noobs, if you´re last you can pretty much say GG before spawning, it´s impossible to tidy up 8 minutes of continous failure from your teammates lol.

I have to do that all the time when I'm playing with you and it works just fine Smiley
Logged
sgMisten Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 778


« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2009, 06:17:38 am »

Just wondering how attack/defend, reinforcement and meeting engagement will work in a war map scenario. Currently we have a choice on what mode to play, but "realistically", it will depend on the war-map.

If the warmap allows the teams to pick the provinces to attack from into, then that can function as a choice. E.g., 50% and 100% allied controlled territory. If Axis are on the attack, they can choose to attack a 100% controlled territory, which will be an axis attack. If they attack a 50% control then it may be a R mode or a meeting engagement (random). This will be quite cool but perhaps too complicated to implement.

If it's like old style EiR where it's attack/defend with no real choice, then the different modes ought to be randomised or something to make it 'fair', since now there is a win condition at stake in terms of territory.

How oh how, are you going to precede dear devs?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 38 queries.