[i cant english well]
now panzerfausts take MUs.
thats good. if panzerfausts only take MP, Allies tanks cant survivor. so thats fair.
and now Stukas little more FUs.
but... another weapons...
allies and aixs grenades got a same MP, MU.
but effect is not same.
allies mines is 60mp 10mu 2uses.
axis minens is 40mp same MU 1uses.
....i cant understand
stickys 50mp 10mu '4uses'
four? what the... one sticky bomb can kill the KT.
50mp 10mu 4uses is toooooooo cheap.
Stickys cant kill a KT. They might engine damage it, but barely hurt it. Also, thats a good price for a weapons thats rarely ever used. Rifles die too quickly for them to be effective.
and sherman.
75fuel.
it is not expensive but
panzer4 is 85fuel!!! what is it!?
Shermans are worse off than p4's. Shermans have paper armor, and crappy penetration without upgun and TT. For a p4, your offered a better overall tank from the get-go, while you need upgrades for a sherm.
panzer4 is stronger than sherman?
no!
may be EIR's head dont want to see the panzer4.
Rofl
and last.
how about persing.
its 250fuel, 17pop
panther is 200fuel 20pop
how can i understand
Its a trade-off. Pershing costs more, but has lower pop. Panther costs less, but has higher pop.
panther is good only vs. tanks
and persing too.
but panther cant against to persing
a panther v. a persh is about the same. it all really depends on micro and luck between that,
i say persing is not expensive, but panther is too expensive.
and another problem is persing pop
i think.
