*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 31, 2024, 05:08:29 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 30 cal manpower price  (Read 3400 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« on: June 15, 2014, 01:51:39 pm »

Shouldn't this be lower? It's a small thing, but its limiting 30 cal heavy builds. (Hardly OP)
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2014, 02:01:42 pm »

It's a problem for a lot of support weapons (wehrmacht mortar is 480 manpower). General balance wise it would make more sense if support weapons costs more munitions and less manpower because that's what they bring, heavier weapons, not manpower.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
jackmccrack Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2484


« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2014, 02:13:26 pm »

Signed
Logged

Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2014, 03:22:00 pm »

They are force multipliers, put the MP much lower and you'll be using them in the stead of general infantry. US MG's are only 250 MP atm, being 50 MP more than a Rifleman squad.

WM support weapons happen to be extremely efficient at they do (MG and Mortar) and have a high price tag to reflect it, but even so the WM MG is 270 MP, which is only 30 MP more than a Grenadier squad.

I mean, 350 MP for the US mortar may feel pricey, but would you want hordes of the things fielded because they were so dirt cheap?

The only one that is really high on price is the WM mortar, but that thing eats Allied infantry and support weapons alive.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
jackmccrack Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2484


« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2014, 03:44:27 pm »

Dat Locked & Loaded // Heavy Support build, tho
Logged
Poppi Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1080


« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2014, 12:17:53 am »

Dat Locked & Loaded // Heavy Support build, tho

still US mortars are far the worst of the factions
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2014, 05:51:30 am »

MGs are expensive manpower wise because they are cheap munitionwise. It is a high mp low mun investment which is efficient at its task in every faction.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 35 queries.