30 cal manpower price

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Smokaz]

Shouldn't this be lower? It's a small thing, but its limiting 30 cal heavy builds. (Hardly OP)

[PonySlaystation]

It's a problem for a lot of support weapons (wehrmacht mortar is 480 manpower). General balance wise it would make more sense if support weapons costs more munitions and less manpower because that's what they bring, heavier weapons, not manpower.

[jackmccrack]

Signed

[Hicks58]

They are force multipliers, put the MP much lower and you'll be using them in the stead of general infantry. US MG's are only 250 MP atm, being 50 MP more than a Rifleman squad.

WM support weapons happen to be extremely efficient at they do (MG and Mortar) and have a high price tag to reflect it, but even so the WM MG is 270 MP, which is only 30 MP more than a Grenadier squad.

I mean, 350 MP for the US mortar may feel pricey, but would you want hordes of the things fielded because they were so dirt cheap?

The only one that is really high on price is the WM mortar, but that thing eats Allied infantry and support weapons alive.

[jackmccrack]

Dat Locked & Loaded // Heavy Support build, tho

[Poppi]

Dat Locked & Loaded // Heavy Support build, tho

still US mortars are far the worst of the factions

[NightRain]

MGs are expensive manpower wise because they are cheap munitionwise. It is a high mp low mun investment which is efficient at its task in every faction.