*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 20, 2024, 05:47:49 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 006j Hotfix  (Read 20111 times)
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #60 on: June 16, 2009, 08:42:07 pm »

Personally I disagree with the restriction on one lmg or shrek on a single grenadier squad. I think it was a bad change because wehr doesnt have a tank movement disabler and needs to be able to put out a lot of damage against circling tanks. Their accuracy with veterancy and at medium range coupled with their penetration is a bigger issue for me. As for double lmgs, you needed to counter these with snipers or tanks which imo was okay. Rangers and commandos could overpower them given ideal conditions as well.

The medikit change was a bit heavy-handed as well. Their effectiveness in combat was where the main criticism lay, and it was not accompanied by a triage type of nerf nerf too if the system is supposed to be that healing units are vulnerable to attack, which makes sense.

As for 006g, I hope a commando price increase is imminent after playing Leophone and Mudkip's commando spam companies. Not the piat commando, but the regular ones. The amount of commandos you could field even with full advantages was just stupid. I felt outsquadded with my infantry spam PE company (!).

i'd have to agree about that but commando's really dont have any type of anti tank, and a lot of commando spam don't have brens to button tanks. I played against commando spam and had no real issues. Matter of fact, it was leo phone and i won that game. But yea, there were a lot of commandos Cheesy
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
CryingWolf Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 138


« Reply #61 on: June 17, 2009, 11:32:34 am »

I think it was a bad change because wehr doesnt have a tank movement disabler and needs to be able to put out a lot of damage against circling tanks.

Correction, they used to NOT have a crippler...the new Volk mines are Cripple mines, they do NO damage, but they make the tank move a little bit faster then a Destroyed engine, not matter what it is Smiley
Logged

Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Wolf?
Latios418 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 443


« Reply #62 on: June 17, 2009, 11:59:13 am »

What was the point of posting that message? He knows they have it now. He posted that BEFORE the volks mines were in.
Logged

Quote
Anonymous 06/19/09(Fri)11:55 No.4931966

Is Akranadas in this thread? Fucker can't stop bragging about his "waifu taldeer" and cosplaying in an eldar farseer costume while shouting "Flithy monkeighs!" interspaced with random eldar gibberish.
Lt_Apollo Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 380


« Reply #63 on: June 17, 2009, 02:14:17 pm »

i must be mising somthing but since WHEN have mines actualy stoped a cercil strafe? all fractions get mines once again a static imoble take disabler is not a valid solution to the core problem at hand of not having eather the old stoping power of dual shreks or having a simi reliable tank disabler.
Logged

Sach Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1211


« Reply #64 on: June 17, 2009, 02:16:34 pm »

seriously, who the fuck uses duel schrecks on grens anyway?
Logged

Sach Wins! Cheesy

Would people please stop killing my AVREs. Not cool.
Lt_Apollo Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 380


« Reply #65 on: June 17, 2009, 02:19:02 pm »

LOL i do and most of my teamates and any one who uses shreks serously. even if you didnt use you always had that option why restrict us when orignal THERE WAS NO PROBLEM.
Logged
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #66 on: June 17, 2009, 02:29:02 pm »

I didn't but i just made a company with dual lmgs, well that's gone now, as i have no way of getting it back.

For 50 pp you should be able to get both, double schreck and double lmg tbh.
Logged

Lt_Apollo Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 380


« Reply #67 on: June 17, 2009, 05:04:14 pm »

the one thing that bugs me about that is that you still haft to replace one of your docs just to get basic weapons that have always been standard, idk i just dont get why i haft to waist PP on a doc to unlock 1 weapon for 1 unit and thats 1 of my 3 t2s gone, just seams like a mjor waist of time imo. idk mayby make it for both LMG and shrek plus couple it with some sort of docternal gren buff for witch ever doc is you buy it for (Ie supresion res for grens for blitz decreased relode time a bit 2, more health for deffensive on grens and reduced incoming accurcy, more supresion and dmg for grens on terror maybe?)

now i could see the as a nice t2 or t3 that would give each doctrine its own flavor when it comes to infentry warfare.
Logged
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #68 on: June 17, 2009, 06:15:04 pm »

as Smokaz mentioned on the previous page, I'd love to see someone look at shrek accuracy at medium range w/ vet2+.  It seems a little over the top to me...
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 36 queries.