*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 11, 2024, 08:29:20 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: BC sabotage !!!  (Read 9245 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Raio Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 243



« on: July 20, 2009, 03:20:19 pm »

my BCs r more dangerous then Maleovens KTvet3  for me !



  one Nebel shoot killed 4 men from my brensVEt3 in, BC himself stays almost undamanged. Also one destroyed BC took my (4man) VET3 brens to hell.  Bcs becomin too dangerous to use  Roll Eyes

 
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 03:24:03 pm by Raio » Logged
Raio Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 243



« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2009, 03:27:16 pm »

Received damage for units inside BCs would not be so hardCore i guess.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 03:37:58 pm by Raio » Logged
SaintPauli Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 530


« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2009, 03:27:32 pm »

Good… Trying to shoot tanks from a moving unarmored vehicle should not be you primary tactical solution…  
Logged
acker Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053


« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2009, 03:29:43 pm »

In the same game, I hit someone's panzerschrek-laden IHT with a Pershing. I don't think anyone died from that hit, my Pershing's infantry kill counter didn't go up. 2 People died in the ensuing IHT crash, but not from the hit.

Aren't units in open-topped carriers supposed to take splash damage or something?
Logged
Raio Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 243



« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2009, 03:31:24 pm »

Good… Trying to shoot tanks from a moving unarmored vehicle should not be you primary tactical solution…  

Saint, did u c me doin this sometime ?
  no ?  sure man , im not usin BCs for PIATs. Maybe do not talk about things u dont know  Wink


ACker, have no idea. Maybe devs can check stats  Undecided
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 03:35:02 pm by Raio » Logged
Armfelt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 453



« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2009, 03:40:54 pm »

But british canīt do anything against tankblobs now, i donīt want back the mario kart tactic, but FFīs are expensive and dual 6 lbs. canīt handle multiple tanks. Last match I played as RE and my teammates were  Commandos and US armor, We met three Blitzkrieg wehrs with atleast 2 players with heated round skill. We didnīt stand a chance when the germans sended in three  PIV, two Panthers and one Tiger...

What should we have done to handle that?

It was Carentan (city map with wide streets everywhere + ruins) so PIVs wins against ATGs/Infantry or badly hurts tanks, Panthers pwn allied armor.

Edit.
I must add that both teams had 40 pop.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 03:44:25 pm by Armfelt » Logged


"Well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one."
Raio Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 243



« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2009, 03:46:34 pm »

hey guys, im talkin about BCs, not about one game Smiley

 BCs r doin insane dmg to my units in, BCs r becomin movin coffins.
Logged
Armfelt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 453



« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2009, 03:55:49 pm »

I felt that the game was a good summary of what the loss of the BC have turned into. And they were mostly used pre this hotfix as a type of combined anti armor role (AT infantry inside).

As it is now the BC is rendered useless except capping territory fast with infantry inside. It is tragic but as it is now CW lost itīs most powerful unit -the mario kart  Shocked

And still are the BC more expensive than the PE clowncar.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 04:01:19 pm by Armfelt » Logged
Illegal_Carrot Offline
Global Moderator
*
Posts: 1068


« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2009, 04:04:48 pm »

And still are the BC more expensive than the PE clowncar.
Quote from: Latest Price Thread
Bren Gun Carrier - 180 MP, 15 F, 3 pop
Infantry Halftrack - 210 MP, 35 F, 4 pop
The Bren Carrier is not, nor has it ever been (IIRC) more expensive than an Infantry HT.
Logged

Quote
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk.
acker Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053


« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2009, 04:10:07 pm »

IllegalCarrot, the Bren got a massive price increase a few hotfixes ago. That thread is somewhat out of date.

I just created a new account, deleted it, and created another new account to see the prices.

Bren Carrier: 230 MP, 40 FU.

Infantry Halftrack: 210 MP, 35 FU.


For some reason, this is so. You are wrong.
Logged
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2009, 04:32:24 pm »

I felt that the game was a good summary of what the loss of the BC have turned into. And they were mostly used pre this hotfix as a type of combined anti armor role (AT infantry inside).

As it is now the BC is rendered useless except capping territory fast with infantry inside. It is tragic but as it is now CW lost itīs most powerful unit -the mario kart  Shocked

And still are the BC more expensive than the PE clowncar.

I love my BCs, they still rape infantry and support weapons with flamers inside.   Piat clown cars were retarded anyways.

However the PE clowncar is just better(although bigger hitbox) atm.   This may or may not be a design decision considering Brits have a bunch of advantages over PE(like having actual support weapons and way better infantry).
Logged
Armfelt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 453



« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2009, 04:39:56 pm »

I love my BCs, they still rape infantry and support weapons with flamers inside.

But then another problem appaers with the fact that british troops lack handheld flamethrowers.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 04:47:03 pm by Armfelt » Logged
Raio Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 243



« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2009, 04:49:29 pm »

gamesguy2: u r usin BCs for non Veted units, who cares about ded flame enginers : ))


illega: BCs r 230mp  40fu, pop 4
Logged
Mukip Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 450



« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2009, 04:54:13 pm »

The damage units inside a bren carrier can take is ridiculous.  I've seen a tank shot hit a full health BC and kill the 3/4th the squad inside from full health, if this happened to a PE or Wehr halftrack there would be hell to pay.  It was silly before when they took no damage and were immune to flames and it's silly now they take excessive damage.
Logged
Armfelt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 453



« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2009, 05:07:35 pm »

Precisely, that is why B-A-L-A-N-C-E is needed, or else it will be like this Grin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFarotAqh9s

.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 05:23:29 pm by Armfelt » Logged
Armfelt Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 453



« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2009, 05:46:04 pm »

What is the opinion of the Mods/Devs/Testers?
Logged
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2009, 06:56:04 pm »

Precisely, that is why B-A-L-A-N-C-E is needed, or else it will be like this Grin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFarotAqh9s

.

yes, what do the devs think about this? i want a balance change, laws of gravity needs a fix.
Logged
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2009, 07:03:02 pm »

But british canīt do anything against tankblobs now, i donīt want back the mario kart tactic, but FFīs are expensive and dual 6 lbs. canīt handle multiple tanks. Last match I played as RE and my teammates were  Commandos and US armor, We met three Blitzkrieg wehrs with atleast 2 players with heated round skill. We didnīt stand a chance when the germans sended in three  PIV, two Panthers and one Tiger...

What should we have done to handle that?

It was Carentan (city map with wide streets everywhere + ruins) so PIVs wins against ATGs/Infantry or badly hurts tanks, Panthers pwn allied armor.

Edit.
I must add that both teams had 40 pop.


Send in 3 fireflies, 6 AT guns, and maybe a Pershing...you'll be fine.
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
LuAn Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 572



« Reply #18 on: July 20, 2009, 07:07:21 pm »

I just had a game with two P4 Vet2 involved, and i cant imagine them being killed by CW units.

My Mk6 also lost vs a p4 head on Sad
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 07:09:48 pm by LuAn » Logged

aka UckY  Wink
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2009, 04:40:12 am »

And still are the BC more expensive than the PE clowncar.
Quote from: Latest Price Thread
Bren Gun Carrier - 180 MP, 15 F, 3 pop
Infantry Halftrack - 210 MP, 35 F, 4 pop
The Bren Carrier is not, nor has it ever been (IIRC) more expensive than an Infantry HT.

When's the last time you played allies?
Oh, right.

The bren carrier had been WAY more expensive than the IHT for like a decade before the patch that brought us Mario Karts, while being in the sorry state they are in now(lose squads inside when getting shot at by anything).

My suggestion : remove the ability to gun down the squads inside for ALL weapons, except the flamethrower.
It's just gay to lose a vet 3 squad inside a bren carrier because a nebel round landed 5 km away from it -.-
Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 36 queries.