Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 01, 2024, 07:28:41 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 4
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 6
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
Please don’t open this th...
by
Shabtajus
[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
General Discussion
>
T17
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: T17 (Read 6204 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
panzerman
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689
T17
«
on:
October 08, 2009, 03:38:34 am »
wats the first thing that comes to your head at the thought of this vehicle.
mine is wat the hell do i do to stop it that won't mean i have 2 much at on the field.
Logged
Malgoroth
Donator
Posts: 960
Re: T17
«
Reply #1 on:
October 08, 2009, 04:10:46 am »
Welcome to my minefield, asshole.
Logged
Hicks359
Guest
Re: T17
«
Reply #2 on:
October 08, 2009, 05:55:15 am »
Why did i make my main account Brit...
Logged
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190
Re: T17
«
Reply #3 on:
October 08, 2009, 06:04:09 am »
Quote from: Malgoroth on October 08, 2009, 04:10:46 am
Welcome to my minefield, asshole.
i 2nd that
12 mines anyone???
Logged
Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves
Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Piotrskivich
EIR Veteran
Posts: 542
Re: T17
«
Reply #4 on:
October 08, 2009, 08:43:15 am »
My first thought is, lolz,
I don't bring a single schrek
Logged
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: T17
«
Reply #5 on:
October 08, 2009, 09:09:25 am »
i dont understand why some of you guys have so much trouble with this. Maybe it's a more of an anti wehr strategy because as PE I've never had issues with T-17 spam.
Logged
Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
Re: T17
«
Reply #6 on:
October 08, 2009, 09:18:02 am »
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:09:25 am
i dont understand why some of you guys have so much trouble with this. Maybe it's a more of an anti wehr strategy because as PE I've never had issues with T-17 spam.
Maybe your just one of the Pro players with uber skill. Then your opinion won't count, as only the mid skillers do the balancing
Logged
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: T17
«
Reply #7 on:
October 08, 2009, 09:22:51 am »
Quote from: Baine on October 08, 2009, 09:18:02 am
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:09:25 am
i dont understand why some of you guys have so much trouble with this. Maybe it's a more of an anti wehr strategy because as PE I've never had issues with T-17 spam.
Maybe your just one of the Pro players with uber skill. Then your opinion won't count, as only the mid skillers do the balancing
I'm not pro, i barely win half my games as pe but it's usually not light vehicle spam that gives me problems it's usually just the endless mass of allied infantry that gets me.
Logged
crimsonrabbit
EIR Veteran
Posts: 380
Re: T17
«
Reply #8 on:
October 08, 2009, 12:05:03 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:22:51 am
Quote from: Baine on October 08, 2009, 09:18:02 am
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:09:25 am
i dont understand why some of you guys have so much trouble with this. Maybe it's a more of an anti wehr strategy because as PE I've never had issues with T-17 spam.
Maybe your just one of the Pro players with uber skill. Then your opinion won't count, as only the mid skillers do the balancing
I'm not pro, i barely win half my games as pe but it's usually not light vehicle spam that gives me problems it's usually just the endless mass of allied infantry that gets me.
hey tym ma brotha frum anotha mutha n fatha n continent, look on da brighyt side homie at least u git 2 smoke sum foos online.
represent...
i support barack obama and jesse jackson.
peace out homie.
Logged
I defy all laws of scienceee.
This is Bunny.
Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination
(\__/)
(+'.'+)
(")_(")
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: T17
«
Reply #9 on:
October 08, 2009, 12:05:54 pm »
You're like a cartoon character, crimson.
Logged
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
crimsonrabbit
EIR Veteran
Posts: 380
Re: T17
«
Reply #10 on:
October 08, 2009, 12:07:39 pm »
Quote from: Smokaz link=topic=12539.msg213385#msg213385 date=125502javascript:void(0);5154
You're like a cartoon character, crimson.
Logged
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: T17
«
Reply #11 on:
October 08, 2009, 12:45:09 pm »
Quote from: crimsonrabbit on October 08, 2009, 12:05:03 pm
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:22:51 am
Quote from: Baine on October 08, 2009, 09:18:02 am
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:09:25 am
i dont understand why some of you guys have so much trouble with this. Maybe it's a more of an anti wehr strategy because as PE I've never had issues with T-17 spam.
Maybe your just one of the Pro players with uber skill. Then your opinion won't count, as only the mid skillers do the balancing
I'm not pro, i barely win half my games as pe but it's usually not light vehicle spam that gives me problems it's usually just the endless mass of allied infantry that gets me.
hey tym ma brotha frum anotha mutha n fatha n continent, look on da brighyt side homie at least u git 2 smoke sum foos online.
represent...
i support barack obama and jesse jackson.
peace out homie.
I take offense ot that, I hate jesse jackson
Logged
crimsonrabbit
EIR Veteran
Posts: 380
Re: T17
«
Reply #12 on:
October 08, 2009, 12:56:02 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 12:45:09 pm
Quote from: crimsonrabbit on October 08, 2009, 12:05:03 pm
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:22:51 am
Quote from: Baine on October 08, 2009, 09:18:02 am
Quote from: Tymathee on October 08, 2009, 09:09:25 am
i dont understand why some of you guys have so much trouble with this. Maybe it's a more of an anti wehr strategy because as PE I've never had issues with T-17 spam.
Maybe your just one of the Pro players with uber skill. Then your opinion won't count, as only the mid skillers do the balancing
I'm not pro, i barely win half my games as pe but it's usually not light vehicle spam that gives me problems it's usually just the endless mass of allied infantry that gets me.
hey tym ma brotha frum anotha mutha n fatha n continent, look on da brighyt side homie at least u git 2 smoke sum foos online.
represent...
i support barack obama and jesse jackson.
peace out homie.
I take offense ot that, I hate jesse jackson
AY AY AY! Dont b racist!
represent...
Logged
CrazyWR
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616
Re: T17
«
Reply #13 on:
October 08, 2009, 01:47:46 pm »
too much AT = 1 p4?
Logged
Quote from: Ununoctium on September 03, 2009, 07:45:25 am
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
Quote from: jackmccrack on February 09, 2012, 12:47:54 pm
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
BradAnderson
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1233
Re: T17
«
Reply #14 on:
October 08, 2009, 05:51:20 pm »
Crimson, you scare me dawg.
Logged
panzerman
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689
Re: T17
«
Reply #15 on:
October 08, 2009, 06:19:59 pm »
Quote from: CrazyWR on October 08, 2009, 01:47:46 pm
too much AT = 1 p4?
somthing that costs about the same and is an even counter.
Logged
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: T17
«
Reply #16 on:
October 08, 2009, 07:06:30 pm »
Something that a few players need to Realize is that tweaking the t17 to be less effective based on the arguments and concerns that have been raised, sets a precedence for future balancing. Allow me to recap the issues related to the t17 to the best of my ability.
- It is overperforming for cost (It has effective health comparable to shermans against most wehr AT for much less fuel and manpower cost)
- Its mobility has no pop equivalent counter from wehrmacht; nothing wehrmacht has can keep up with its movement and still counter it for pop
-- The above causes a problem as it leaves wehrmacht unable to compete for map control against t17 on the sides with options that are supposed to allow them to do this (Upgun puma failing)
- Even counters that have similar population cost to the t17 and are unable to compete for mobility, are unreliable at best in taking down a t17 that decides to fight it (pak + shrek) because of it overperforming for cost
Now that we have recapped the issue, I will further endorse why balancing the t17 from these arguments sets a good precedence, one that is particularily fitting for the issue of the upgun sherman.
- Upgun sherman underperforms for cost compared to similar options (Upgrade of P4 has no downside and still makes it better at its duties)
- The inability of the upgun sherman to reliably defeat a p4 (which it should) constitutes a mobility problem, as the p4 is the same pop cost
- This causes a problem for americans as they cannot send a upgun sherman for pop to deal with a p4 but have to bring an additonal AT source that can deal with the p4
It's not a 100% clear A to B extrapolation, but let's try to get away from the balancing that one imbalance justifies another which seems to be prevalent on these forums. We're not looking to make a makeshift balance here, glued together and secured with ducktape.
Logged
panzerman
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689
Re: T17
«
Reply #17 on:
October 08, 2009, 11:52:42 pm »
i would rather see a sherman even or better than the P4 and the stag debuffed or somthing. because a sherman in some ways was better than a P4 or at least it was an even fight.
Logged
nated0g
EIR Veteran
Posts: 90
Re: T17
«
Reply #18 on:
October 09, 2009, 12:05:32 am »
Personally, I dont find the T17 to be a particular problem. It the hands of a good player its is devastating. But then again so are alot of things in the hands of a good player.
I personally have tried this myself ( i play both sides ) and have failed on several occasions and succeded on several others.
Alot of the problems of dealing with T17s come down to several factors:
1) Lack of vent; unfortunetly, countering Light Armour Spam (LAS) required an incrediable high amount of team work (and often throwing away vet). Any team unable to quickly co-ordinate a defense can be easily swept aside. Thats the nature of EIR team games.
2)Lack of AT; some companies simply dont carry enough AT as axis. This tho is a particular problem for PE which is part of PE's characteristic. The lack of a medium tank (and turreted vehicles) means there is very little a PE player can do against fast moving targets. That is not an issue with the T17 but with PE in particular.
3) A mixture of both will definetly cost you a game.
Pop counters are not a good way to measure efficiency. Arguably a panther is way too effective for its pop as for 16 pop it can (and often does) nail several shermans which is 36 pop, double the fuel/manpower. The factions are different and I would strongly advise against direct comparisons for cost/pop/dmg.
I do play both sides alot, if anything I've found the British Staghound is the one i think is more in need to be tweaked, more so than the T17. Personally i think increasing t17s and M8s by 1 Pop (to pop 9), means you can't start with 3 would solve 60-70% of the complaints.
Logged
fallensoldier7
EIR Veteran
Posts: 667
Re: T17
«
Reply #19 on:
October 09, 2009, 12:25:11 am »
On the contrary, in my experiences PE has an easier time dealing with LAS than Wehrmacht. Clown cars are really helpful since the light armor can't run away from a ht. LATHTs are awesome because of their ability to take care of both AI and AT. A disabled light vehicle is a dead one, assuming the PE player has at least a clown car, marder, or 50mm supporting the LATHT. PE just has access to a larger number of mobile AT options, which helps against LAS since hit and run is a common tactic with LAS.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...