puddin
|
|
« on: October 20, 2009, 06:45:11 pm » |
|
I hear they are problems, I challenge them to a game.
Who does it, ITs game time baby....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Puddin' spamtmi cant really blame smokaz i mean playing against puddin is like trying to fight off breast cancer. You might win and do it and be a bad ass but you'll feel sick and mutilated forever.
Puddin' spamtm is soulcrushing... what's hard to understand about that?
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2009, 06:49:03 pm » |
|
only ones that run it are a couple of noobs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
| puddin
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2009, 06:50:16 pm » |
|
Even better
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2009, 06:51:39 pm » |
|
The thread got locked for a reason, so crazy dont start the bs up again quit actin like a little girl. it's a valid tactic and it doesn't matter if you like it or not. Everyone runs some type of spam, Two likes to use bazooka'd rifles some like grens, others like airborne. I run a PzGren spam company with a little indirect fire spam in my PE (Hummel, Stuka, Mortar HT) some like ot have loads of AT spam, i'm sure you spam something so can we stop this already?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| Two
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2009, 07:02:38 pm » |
|
We could stop it if availability was changed back to the old system  And i didnt really think the riflespam would work that well, first game me and keeps both tried it, cept he had bars and stickes, got raped by computer and someone, ferocity ftl. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
 Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2009, 07:08:00 pm » |
|
Its good against PE for sure
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
| puddin
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2009, 07:41:24 pm » |
|
i know, I am serious, I want to fight these armies, I want to try to play this company build. Its a fuckign dream come true.
Its why i created my Thread, So stop bringing old thread arguments into this one damn it.
If your not running that kind kind of caompany don;t post here, I want to play them. If you have the balls to be my teamate then speak up, if not don;t post here.
Seriously, Only 3 ppl should post. My future temate and the 2 ppl with those compaines....
I want to see if i can take them on.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2009, 07:45:33 pm » |
|
I'll play with you, puddin. We should play against killer and two, they had good synergy with their companies. My terror and your blitz, or my blitz and your blitz.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2009, 07:48:03 pm » |
|
I was being serious Tym. I've yet to see anyone run a riflespam company that was actually good at EIR in 2.7...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| puddin
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2009, 07:50:25 pm » |
|
I was being serious Tym. I've yet to see anyone run a riflespam company that was actually good at EIR in 2.7...
Seruiously, You can respond to tym in a different thread, THis one was made for 3 ppl, which you don;t seem to be interesting in being any, Sure smokaz, I am down for it, Terror does seem to be a bit op for it, Maybe our blitz because when they lose i don;t want to hear how terror is OP. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2009, 08:28:23 pm » |
|
Uh huh. My current blitz is amazing anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
 Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2009, 08:47:41 pm » |
|
We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2009, 08:51:32 pm » |
|
We will.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Computer991
Donator
Posts: 1219
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2009, 08:59:58 pm » |
|
Uh huh. My current blitz is amazing anyways.
NO MINE IS BETTER |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheWindCriesMary
The Ethics Police
EIR Veteran Posts: 2630
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 20, 2009, 09:13:43 pm » |
|
Personally I haven't met a riflespam company that wasn't pretty darn fail, no matter how good the player behind it was.
There are alot of strategies/company builds that allied players do field that leave me shivering at night in fear, but this just isn't one of them. P4's and puma's/ostwinds just make a mockery of american riflespam and laugh all the way to the bank while their zooks chip the paint.
-Wind
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Vermillion Hawk: Do you ever make a post that doesnt make you come across as an extreme douchebag?
Just sayin'
|
|
|
| fallensoldier7
|
|
« Reply #15 on: October 20, 2009, 09:28:46 pm » |
|
I run riflespam with 17 rifles and M1 carbines. I haven't played it for at least 2 weeks though. The only weakness I had was against massive AC's since I don't use rangers and I haven't unlocked zooks yet. If you use infantry (besides Terror grens) then usually I will win. I think the reason I took such a long break from that company is that Terror grens are just so effective against it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2009, 09:31:22 pm » |
|
I faced two's riflespam today. tbh the reason why my team had no chance was because PQ had a total of like 2 P4 IST for anti infantry in his tank hunter co.
From what I did see, the rifleblob literally blobbed around the map. It would've been far more effective if those 5 or 6 rifles came in from 3-4 different points, but they didnt, and i was just chasing them around with an ostwind all game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| fallensoldier7
|
|
« Reply #17 on: October 20, 2009, 09:49:11 pm » |
|
Usually I won't have more than 2 squads on at one time. 2 squads are enough to focus fire down charging squads, flank garrisoned mgs, cap lots of territory, and provide BAR SF + nades. More than that is just too much for my CPM to handle without blobbing  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| puddin
|
|
« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2009, 10:21:09 pm » |
|
i do understand how retardation runs rampid on the fourms.... Since noe one is able to read... I assume all ppl who posted after the purpose of the thread was explained to be a retard.
Now all is clear.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| WinIsOp
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 20, 2009, 10:22:54 pm » |
|
This thread is silly, hunt them down in the launcher like a real man.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
