Drama on tanteville

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[gamesguy2]

Hmm, you're really not supposed to be able to chase down things with a focus fire LATHT.

I'll add a modifier so they cant hit anything while moving and using focus fire.

[panzerman]

Hmm, you're really not supposed to be able to chase down things with a focus fire LATHT.

I'll add a modifier so they cant hit anything while moving and using focus fire.

lol!

[CafeMilani]

Hmm, you're really not supposed to be able to chase down things with a focus fire LATHT.

I'll add a modifier so they cant hit anything while moving and using focus fire.

FUCKING fail man. give vetwhores no chance!
those stupid whiners now also get this one 'changed, besides the g43 slowdown which was completely fine with its ability to slow retreating squads...sigh.
btw, you forgot about pumas' and ACs accurracy vs retreating squads; this needs to be fixed too or do you want to have lionels vet rangers in even little danger?

[brn4meplz]

Hmm, you're really not supposed to be able to chase down things with a focus fire LATHT.

I'll add a modifier so they cant hit anything while moving and using focus fire.

FUCKING fail man. give vetwhores no chance!
those stupid whiners now also get this one 'changed, besides the g43 slowdown which was completely fine with its ability to slow retreating squads...sigh.
btw, you forgot about pumas' and ACs accurracy vs retreating squads; this needs to be fixed too or do you want to have lionels vet rangers in even little danger?

I told you people would become stupid Gamesguy. Granted aloha was already there but it's infectious

[gamesguy2]

Hmm, you're really not supposed to be able to chase down things with a focus fire LATHT.

I'll add a modifier so they cant hit anything while moving and using focus fire.

FUCKING fail man. give vetwhores no chance!
those stupid whiners now also get this one 'changed, besides the g43 slowdown which was completely fine with its ability to slow retreating squads...sigh.
btw, you forgot about pumas' and ACs accurracy vs retreating squads; this needs to be fixed too or do you want to have lionels vet rangers in even little danger?

I told you people would become stupid Gamesguy. Granted aloha was already there but it's infectious

I don't know why this is even an issue.  It already gets -75% accuracy chasing retreating infantry.

[Mysthalin]

That's because it isn't an issue, gamesguy - just like FF LATHTs aren't.

The LATHT already has shit for chance to catch retreating infantry - what with the severe slowdown when using FF? You can't even catch up with normal walking infantry when using FF.

[BigDick]

I don't know why this is even an issue.  It already gets -75% accuracy chasing retreating infantry.

that is an issue because elite infantry almost never dies on retreat and you will make them even more survivable because  a vetwhore whined after loosing a retreating vet ranger squad to focus fire and not even managed to completely annihilate 2 halftrack based companys using massive amounts of zooks

instead of doing such changes you should implement a automatically bounty/reward system for killing leaderboard units

[panzerman]

i just watched it and wtf

where was that vet hunting i saw none
and the brit player retreated alot of his vet 3 at like half strenght
and even retreated a full health squad or 2 from a panther when they could have just bottuned and run...

lionel didn't get anything chased or hunted everything i saw retreated did not get chased at all...
they should have won that...

[Killer344]

instead of doing such changes you should implement a automatically bounty/reward system for killing leaderboard units

He can't do that, it ain't RGD coding.

[Evilnrg]

the brit go killed by his own vet XD

2 rangers  companys and afraid to charge some some Ht from pe
go in and get some atg to back up the brit can distract some fire with his roo behind the lines en get his bren en piat out.

and some1  should sacrfice something to kill his Mortar halftrack
 

[LCII^Bun-Bun]

because it doesn't work if you atgcreep...which allies seem to have forgotten...

You'd think so, but actually they rape AT guns way faster than you can rape them (believe me, I had TR ATG spam vs 50 mm and 50 mm won)

[CafeMilani]

the brit go killed by his own vet XD

2 rangers  companys and afraid to charge some some Ht from pe
go in and get some skill to back up the brit can distract some fire with his roo behind the lines en get his bren en piat out.

fixed

[Groundfire]

I watched. There is absolutely nothing here.

Someone overextended and retreated their vet2 ranger squad straight past 2 LATHTs that happened to have focus fire on.

No chasing, no vet hunting, targeting priorities took over. That would've happened if Elitegren was comotose drooling on his keyboard.


P.S. Stop bitching about vet hunting. It's part of the game.

Our objective is to win the war and that becomes easiest when the vet armies are purged.

[Draken]

These guys deserved to loose, there is no way they could have get so much vet in even games with such low skills, they got punished for noobeating.

Death to nigganabs.

[Pak88mm]

These guys deserved to loose, there is no way they could have get so much vet in even games with such low skills, they got punished for noobeating.

Death to nigganabs.

word. im king vet hunter and i love vet hunting vet horders to the max.

[Jodomar]

I watched. There is absolutely nothing here.

Someone overextended and retreated their vet2 ranger squad straight past 2 LATHTs that happened to have focus fire on.

No chasing, no vet hunting, targeting priorities took over. That would've happened if Elitegren was comotose drooling on his keyboard.


P.S. Stop bitching about vet hunting. It's part of the game.

Our objective is to win the war and that becomes easiest when the vet armies are purged.

actually the one ltht didn't pop ff untill the retreating squad ran passed it. There wasn't that many times where stuff was hunted other then the ff and slight chasing of the one ranger squad. There have been plenty of other games where people would chase you across the map with armored cars. I'm just saying that it isn't good sportsmanship to do that, which in return makes the game less fun to play. I will admit that i have been pretty fail lately in some of my games and i need to play better. I Thought that vet hunting was an issue but apparently it isn't since most of you seem to do it. I think it takes away from the game but it looks like it's here to stay so i'll just have to adapt. Maybe i'll make a pe griefing company to see what all the fun is about, but then again i just like paying the game.

[Groundfire]

This is plain and simple logic... if you bring it onto the field, its fair game. Doesnt matter if they have the retreat icon over their head.

Frankly, im tired of seeing the vet3 every game; you guys retreat those squads so early that you force vet hunting upon yourself.  Whether or not a player thinks this is fair or bad sportsmanship is irrelevant.

If it doesnt happen, they just come back next game.

Why is it bad sportsmanship to let you hold the advantage of veterancy? You should make yourself equal to me if i have to maintain an honorable no-fire orders on retreating troops. I have no vet. I never needed it.

Delete your vet, and you will find more sympathy from me.

[badmorning01]

Why is it bad sportsmanship to let you hold the advantage of veterancy? You should make yourself equal to me if i have to maintain an honorable no-fire orders on retreating troops.

QFT. I don't kill vet, because I play allies and axis equally, but was I a dedicated Wehr player I WOULD kill all retreating vet and not let it escape just so it can fight me some other day.

[Smokaz]

the brit go killed by his own vet XD

2 rangers  companys and afraid to charge some some Ht from pe
go in and get some atg to back up the brit can distract some fire with his roo behind the lines en get his bren en piat out.

and some1  should sacrfice something to kill his Mortar halftrack
 

Logging in to my PE,, hang on

YEP

vet 3

Thanks allies, your cowardice with your vet blobz awarded Pansy Elite victory

Damn really, +10 range ? thx guys

[Demon767]

This is plain and simple logic... if you bring it onto the field, its fair game. Doesnt matter if they have the retreat icon over their head.

Frankly, im tired of seeing the vet3 every game; you guys retreat those squads so early that you force vet hunting upon yourself.  Whether or not a player thinks this is fair or bad sportsmanship is irrelevant.

If it doesnt happen, they just come back next game.

Why is it bad sportsmanship to let you hold the advantage of veterancy? You should make yourself equal to me if i have to maintain an honorable no-fire orders on retreating troops. I have no vet. I never needed it.

Delete your vet, and you will find more sympathy from me.

+1
i feel exactly same way.