#Freek
|
|
« on: June 17, 2010, 12:59:54 pm » |
|
Hey,
Is it possible to have uneven teams? Like a 1v2 defending on an uneven map (ei, defending from attackers over a bridge?)
If so, I'd be interested in maybe making an uneven map like that...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2010, 02:02:42 pm » |
|
Who'd want to play a game like those? No one can match 2x The ammount of resources you yourself have, even if it was a chokepoint filled map
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
 Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2010, 02:27:55 pm » |
|
and it would mean the 2 guys attacking the 1 guy are gonna lose all their vet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| #Freek
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2010, 03:01:27 pm » |
|
well, what about smokaz vs 3 newbs?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Grundwaffe
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2010, 03:05:08 pm » |
|
I like your idea, but trust me their all gonna say how they dont like it.
I've been thinking about this to, some defend map, doesn't need to have bridges either.
That would be for the defender self to make and prepare.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 17, 2010, 03:06:56 pm by Metro123 »
|
Logged
|
SublimeHauken - Back from the dead - Since 2007'
|
|
|
| Masacree
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2010, 03:08:54 pm » |
|
well, what about smokaz vs 3 newbs?
Meh, I'd take on smokaZ AND 3 newbs |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I like how this forum in turn brings out the worst in anyone
To err is human, to eirr is retard
|
|
|
Lai
Propaganda Minister
Posts: 3060
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2010, 04:06:24 pm » |
|
Who'd want to play a game like those? No one can match 2x The ammount of resources you yourself have, even if it was a chokepoint filled map
So innocent  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2010, 04:39:54 pm » |
|
I could do a 1v3 with some of my older builds, at least they wouldn't get through me before 10-15 minutes but it would be barely and we have nerfed it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2010, 04:43:55 pm » |
|
Besides you wouldn't need a map or a hard change for you to experience a 1v3.
Just play with the right dudes, they'll make it feel like a 1v3v2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
 Posts: 11009
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2010, 05:11:38 pm » |
|
Id prefer to make a 0v? type map scenario (Co-op vs bots).
But Im sure a few maps could be 1v2 or 2v3 for example. We'd just need the maps for it.
It'd be differing pop values obviously.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shit I'm pretty sure you could offer the guy a cup of coffee and he'd try to kill you with the mug if you forgot sugar.
That's like offering Beer to fuck the fat chick. It will work for a while, but it's not gonna last. Not only that, but there is zero motivation for the Fat chick to loose weight.
Why don't you collect up your love beads and potpourri and find something constructive to do.
|
|
|
Lai
Propaganda Minister
Posts: 3060
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2010, 12:15:02 pm » |
|
I've had amusing illusions of playing 1v4 with 4x pop
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Evilnrg
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2010, 12:20:53 pm » |
|
2 v 3 or 3v4 is fun  but just give them some extra pop cap so its 3 player resource vs 2 player resource you dont need special maps for it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2010, 01:01:13 pm » |
|
or instead of increasing pop by x2, decrease enemy pop by x2 so noobs dont have so much shit to micro.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2010, 01:04:45 pm » |
|
or instead of increasing pop by x2, decrease enemy pop by x2 so noobs dont have so much shit to micro.
only then there will be not enough units on the map. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2010, 01:43:06 pm » |
|
Imagine 4v4 on 1v1 map but players have 4x less pop, everyone micro his single squad, that would require some epic coordination.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 18, 2010, 01:49:39 pm » |
|
and epic boredom. dont u know ToV tried that too? it failed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Jazzhead
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 18, 2010, 02:01:21 pm » |
|
and epic boredom. dont u know ToV tried that too? it failed.
To be fair it's a bit different. But yeah it would be pretty weird. ToV Assault meant just using 1 god-hero (gren lmg) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Ununoctium
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 18, 2010, 02:22:36 pm » |
|
Imagine 4v4 on 1v1 map but players have 4x less pop, everyone micro his single squad, that would require some epic coordination.
"call on another sqaud!" "I cant I haz 2 riflemans" max pop would have to be 20 anyways for the big tanks and stuff But it would be fun to somewhow pull it off. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 My tigers get penetrated by everything. Its really really frustrating.
Your tiger is a whore |
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 18, 2010, 03:22:41 pm » |
|
how about 2-3 inf squads max, in a small map designed as a complex/factory/bunker fighting for control ala command and conquer red alert 1+2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
| Uunderfire
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 21, 2010, 09:22:17 am » |
|
That would be great idea, but I'm just feared about arty ! Imagine the inf attacker against a blitz whermacht: he just play on those maps and make 3 howitzers, then rangers spam when there are no defenses remaining.
But we could make a mode where a doctrine for each faction is chosen as a defensive doctrine, like defensive for whermacht, scorched earth for PE, engi or arti for brit and inf for US, another is chosen as an attacking doctrine and the third... I don't know what it could be. And only the defensive doctrines could be played in defense, and only attacking (or the 2 others) could attack.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
