SX23
|
|
« on: July 12, 2010, 04:58:21 pm » |
|
Even tought i'm pretty much axis biased, this thing is just weird. Having a callie dmged engine at full health by one grenadier nade is quite weird. Is it a bug, a 1 in 1000 occasion, or intended for some dark reasons?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
With Courage shall we Rise,
With Might shall we Fight,
With Glory shall we Stand,
With Honor shall we Falter,
For the Fatherland shall we Prevail.
|
|
|
| Grundwaffe
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2010, 04:59:17 pm » |
|
I played with him, it's true, a grenadier threw a nade and its engine blew  EDIT: sry 18 hp was wrong, i mixed it with something else sryy. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SublimeHauken - Back from the dead - Since 2007'
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
 Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2010, 05:00:18 pm » |
|
5% chance to get engine damage from any penetrating weapon at green HP, IIRC.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
|
|
|
| SX23
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2010, 05:01:20 pm » |
|
5% chance to get engine damage fron any penetrating weapon at green HP.
Grenadier nade is a penetrating weapon?? This means it's more likely to be 1 in a hundred occasion, right? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Grundwaffe
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2010, 05:01:20 pm » |
|
5% chance to get engine damage from any penetrating weapon at green HP, IIRC.
That's realistic.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2010, 05:02:04 pm » |
|
Grenades always penetrate tanks, same with Mortars.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
 |
|
|
| fallensoldier7
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2010, 05:20:06 pm » |
|
I had a puma give my calliope a damaged engine before. My calli was full health and the un-up-gunned puma just drove behind it and hit it once, damaging its engine.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Grundwaffe
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2010, 05:20:57 pm » |
|
I had a puma give my calliope a damaged engine before. My calli was full health and the un-up-gunned puma just drove behind it and hit it once, damaging its engine.
It's painfully sore annoying right, the essence of PAIN. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| pqumsieh
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2010, 05:41:33 pm » |
|
i believe the cali still has truck armor. so its more vulnerable to engine damage than any other vehicle.
PQ
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Common sense is not so common after all.
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2010, 06:22:05 pm » |
|
This is what happens when people think it was a oversight for relic to not have gay crittables on the cali and jagdpanther  Atleast less on cali, the effects are worse but most people that buy calli go next gen so they can just turn their turret to fire, wouldnt be as effective though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2010, 07:01:10 pm » |
|
Yeah, when i had a next gren callie, i would never bring it up to fight like i see al ot of people do unless i absolutely had to.
great hting about truck armor? immune to mines lmao
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 12, 2010, 07:07:47 pm » |
|
You guys made armour types reallly crappy though. I can immobolize your caly with a treadbreaker shot at green HP.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 12, 2010, 07:10:59 pm » |
|
Huh? It's the same as in vCoH
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 12, 2010, 08:05:44 pm » |
|
Oh yeah thats right only jagdpanther got its armour type changed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 12, 2010, 09:34:44 pm » |
|
Oh yeah thats right only jagdpanther got its armour type changed.
and the tiger. Jagdpanther armor made it better. More susceptible against mines but sometimes stickies do only damage. please dont start this again, just cuz your jagd isn't a pwn machine anymore doesn't mean it sux, it just means you have to baby it just like every other superheavy tank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2010, 10:28:35 pm » |
|
25% chance to shrug off a sticky isnt worth it to being not just more suspectible to mines but enemy fire too under yellow to red HP.
Example. A ATG has a a 95% chance to do nothing and a 5% chance to destroy secondary weapon vs normal armour critical tables on yellow HP
but
A ATG has a 75% of doing nothing and a 25% chance of doing engine damage vs elite armour critical tables on yellow HP.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| ShermanFirefly
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2010, 07:55:31 am » |
|
its called realism. there is no such thing as ''my engine will be damaged when a nade is thrown at it only when my tank is already damaged''
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
FireflyDivision
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2010, 10:17:51 am » |
|
and the tiger. Jagdpanther armor made it better. More susceptible against mines but sometimes stickies do only damage. please dont start this again, just cuz your jagd isn't a pwn machine anymore doesn't mean it sux, it just means you have to baby it just like every other superheavy tank.
so first you say it made it better, then clearly state it is worse. Come off it Tym. The change was horseshit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2010, 11:47:18 am » |
|
its called realism. there is no such thing as ''my engine will be damaged when a nade is thrown at it only when my tank is already damaged''
Gameplay>Realism |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 23, 2010, 04:40:42 pm » |
|
so first you say it made it better, then clearly state it is worse. Come off it Tym. The change was horseshit.
what's the #1 threat to most axis armor from americans? Stickies, i've seen so many threads whining about stickies, so u make the jagd less susceptible to crit dmg and people whine. Now, what I may agree with is that it should go back since you can only have one. The change was needed when people would have 2, 3 in their company and killing it was harder than taking out a KT and with doc abilities, it'd just sit back and snipe everything, now it's more like every other tank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
