Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 29, 2024, 01:39:30 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 0
Battles in progress: 0
Battles waiting: 5
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
Doctrine Draft Discussion
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: Doctrine Draft Discussion (Read 16158 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
on:
September 26, 2010, 12:08:47 pm »
Updated with next 4.
Quote from: bbsmith on September 17, 2010, 05:54:35 pm
Link to RAR with all 8
First Four
Defensive
Armor
Artillery
Luftwaffe
Second Four
Blitzkreig
Infantry
Scorched Earth
Commandos
Last Four
Terror
Airborne
Engineers
Tank Hunters
«
Last Edit: October 11, 2010, 01:59:11 pm by Tymathee
»
Logged
Quote from: nikomas on October 04, 2012, 09:26:33 pm
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #1 on:
September 26, 2010, 12:32:32 pm »
I think that when you combine Luft "defensive positions" and "counter measures", whirblewind Lockdown will get alittle too silly vs. elite infantry.
I dont have corsix on me, but under lockdown, +25% base acc. plus an additional 20% recieved accuracy vs. airborne, commandos, and rangers(incomming change) seems like a little bit excessive.
If there are any accuracy vet bonuses stacking ontop of these 2 doctrines, it would be too over the top for my taste.
There should be a cooldown time to get into/out of lockdown otherwise we'll just have a problem similar to what churchills and hulldown are doing now.
Drive in, Lock down, kill everything then run away. There should be some buffer time to get away or take out the threat with some heavy AT.
Logged
Latest Shoutcast:
EIRR Groundcast 11
"The Super Dev Showdown!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGm79rXWhU
(full version)
Firesparks
Honoured Member
Posts: 1209
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #2 on:
September 26, 2010, 12:57:00 pm »
precision ammunition : mortar, 95mm cromwell +25% accuacy
artillery shell ignore accuracy on travel path. This wouldn't benefit the Mortar or the 95mm cromwell.
next gen vehicle:
all those bonus looks a bit too much -20% recieve damage, +20% speed, and -20% reload time?
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 01:15:09 pm by Firesparks
»
Logged
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #3 on:
September 26, 2010, 01:20:03 pm »
Quote from: Firesparks on September 26, 2010, 12:57:00 pm
precision ammunition : mortar, 95mm cromwell +25% accuacy
artillery shell ignore accuracy on travel path. This wouldn't benefit the Mortar or the 95mm cromwell.
Doesnt this effect the AoE accuracy of the round's explosion?
Logged
Speigass
banzai
EIR Veteran
Posts: 114
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #4 on:
September 26, 2010, 04:00:08 pm »
Artilery T4 Marksman training is adding +5 range to Lee, brens, riflenades? Isnt it against the rule not to mess with range on mobile non arty units?
Immproved flamer in armor tree is able to damage vechicles? What penetration it does?
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 04:02:30 pm by Speigass
»
Logged
Firesparks
Honoured Member
Posts: 1209
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #5 on:
September 26, 2010, 04:01:31 pm »
Quote from: Groundfire on September 26, 2010, 01:20:03 pm
Doesnt this effect the AoE accuracy of the round's explosion?
I still don't quite completely understand how the accuacy affect the AOE. None of the mortar ever seems to have "dubs" in all the times I play. If accuracy does affect AOE then 75% of the 81mm's round would have been dubs.
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 04:30:58 pm by Firesparks
»
Logged
Heartmann
Officer of Kindness
Posts: 1776
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #6 on:
September 26, 2010, 04:36:31 pm »
HEARTMANN CONDONES THIS!!! *drooling*
Logged
Quote from: EIRRMod on December 24, 2012, 04:19:41 pm
In the basement getting drunk.
Quote from: tank130 on March 31, 2013, 08:55:36 am
It's not really creepy until I show up.............
- I've heard of being an animal in bed but...
- The phallic principle of the Navy
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #7 on:
September 26, 2010, 04:42:26 pm »
Quote from: Firesparks on September 26, 2010, 04:01:31 pm
I still don't quite completely understand how the accuacy affect the AOE. None of the mortar ever seems to have "dubs" in all the times I play. If accuracy does affect AOE then 75% of the 81mm's round would have been dubs.
it affects the randomness. So if something is standing still, there will be a higher chance of it hitting, so this would make the mortar and 95mm cromwell really good versus infantry in buildings and stationary targets but possibly worse against moving targets because an inaccurate artillery would benefit firing against a moving targe
Logged
Firesparks
Honoured Member
Posts: 1209
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #8 on:
September 26, 2010, 04:49:23 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on September 26, 2010, 04:42:26 pm
it affects the randomness. So if something is standing still, there will be a higher chance of it hitting, so this would make the mortar and 95mm cromwell really good versus infantry in buildings and stationary targets but possibly worse against moving targets because an inaccurate artillery would benefit firing against a moving targe
....
what? That reads like mumble to me. We're talking about the shell's AOE.
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 04:52:11 pm by Firesparks
»
Logged
bbsmith
The Brain and Muscle
Posts: 2778
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #9 on:
September 26, 2010, 07:01:10 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on September 26, 2010, 12:08:47 pm
Defensive - Buffing the Flak 88's health won't really matter because the biggest issue with Flak's is being decrewed, not destroyed. Giving the crew Elite Armor would be much more helpful. By giving it more health, it'd be allowing the enemy a much higher chance of stealing it.
You do know that a Flak 88 counts as a Teamed Weapon? Which means it will get Elite Armor.
Quote from: Tymathee on September 26, 2010, 12:08:47 pm
Armor - Stolen Intel is basically a rip off of an RCA ability on the same tier. Maybe some sort of awareness thing like the Tank Hunters have except that it detects weapon teams, so you can see all hmgs, mortars, paks and even flaks on the field. Another idea would be to bring back the WP stun that the t-17 had, give it to jeeps and make it like 100 mu and put it on uses.
The original Armor recon ability was going to do something along the lines of spawn some sort of Jeep and have it scout or something like a recon run but on the ground. I dropped it because I didn't feel like doing it. No stun abilities.
Quote from: Tymathee on September 26, 2010, 12:08:47 pm
RCA - AS much as I love RCA...Suppression Training may be a bit OP but of course i'd have to see it in battle so i don't know but suppression on brens just sounds too awesome. Heh, nice to see one of my RCA ideas get in too, Grenade Volley ftw
That's a typo, only the Bren MMG carrier gets suppression fire.
And the Grenade T3 would probably give normal Grenades purchasable for Tommies instead of Assault Grenades.
Quote from: Tymathee on September 26, 2010, 12:08:47 pm
Luft - No problems here, i think this is largely problem free imo.
Yay
Logged
Quote from: aloha622 on March 28, 2010, 07:11:18 pm
prove it and you'll win
Quote from: bbsmith on March 28, 2010, 07:21:29 pm
I win.
Quote from: aloha622 on March 28, 2010, 07:30:53 pm
k u win.
bbsmith
The Brain and Muscle
Posts: 2778
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #10 on:
September 26, 2010, 07:12:14 pm »
Quote from: Speigass on September 26, 2010, 04:00:08 pm
Artilery T4 Marksman training is adding +5 range to Lee, brens, riflenades? Isnt it against the rule not to mess with range on mobile non arty units?
The main problem with range increases were from Tanks and Airborne. The +5 Range wont really be game breaking in this instance. Unlike the old range increase abilities it wont increase the range of picked up weapons so you wont have 45 Range Panzershrecks on Tommies or anything.
There are a few reasons reason why extra range on rifles is more reasonable than extra range on Tanks.
1.You can't kite with the rifles because they only really fire forward on the move.
2.You can't do Infantry AT hit and runs like (Airborne with the Airborne Elite T4)
3.Lee Enfields are wildly inaccurate at long range.
The +5 range on Brens will just bring it up to the 40 Range that the LMG42 has.
The +5 range on Rifle Grenades is pretty good.
Quote from: Speigass on September 26, 2010, 04:00:08 pm
Immproved flamer in armor tree is able to damage vechicles? What penetration it does?
http://picly.us/coh/Weapon_M2_Flamethrower.html
Look at the target tables. The damage it does will just be improved upon from that.
Logged
bbsmith
The Brain and Muscle
Posts: 2778
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #11 on:
September 26, 2010, 07:15:33 pm »
Quote from: Groundfire on September 26, 2010, 12:32:32 pm
I think that when you combine Luft "defensive positions" and "counter measures", whirblewind Lockdown will get alittle too silly vs. elite infantry.
I dont have corsix on me, but under lockdown, +25% base acc. plus an additional 20% recieved accuracy vs. airborne, commandos, and rangers(incomming change) seems like a little bit excessive.
If there are any accuracy vet bonuses stacking ontop of these 2 doctrines, it would be too over the top for my taste.
There should be a cooldown time to get into/out of lockdown otherwise we'll just have a problem similar to what churchills and hulldown are doing now.
Drive in, Lock down, kill everything then run away. There should be some buffer time to get away or take out the threat with some heavy AT.
Of course there's a lockdown time for the Wirbelwind. It was going to be 5s/5s because the Lockdown actually puts it close to a Flakvierling in DPS.
With both Lockdown and Defensive Positions The wirbelwind will do.
To Airborne
Long Range: 35% Accuracy to 52% Accuracy
Short/Medium Range: 50% Accuracy to 75% Accuracy
To Rangers/Commandos
Long Range: 26% Accuracy to 39% Accuracy
Short/Medium Range: 37% Accuracy to 56% Accuracy
«
Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 07:19:57 pm by bbsmith
»
Logged
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #12 on:
September 26, 2010, 07:55:00 pm »
Fair enough, thanks for the clarification Bob!
Logged
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #13 on:
September 26, 2010, 07:55:44 pm »
Quote from: bbsmith on September 26, 2010, 07:01:10 pm
You do know that a Flak 88 counts as a Teamed Weapon? Which means it will get Elite Armor.
I wasn't sure, so that's cool, putting both together is real nice.
Quote
The original Armor recon ability was going to do something along the lines of spawn some sort of Jeep and have it scout or something like a recon run but on the ground. I dropped it because I didn't feel like doing it. No stun abilities.
Aww no stun meh just an idea. But u didn't say what u thought about the team weapon awareness, i think that would really benefit Armor well. You could only see hmgs, mortars, paks and 88's.
Quote
That's a typo, only the Bren MMG carrier gets suppression fire.
And the Grenade T3 would probably give normal Grenades purchasable for Tommies instead of Assault Grenades.
Yay
Oh okay, i like idea for the mmg carrier, especially since i use quite a few of them. As for the grenade t3, i was talking about the rifle grenade volley
Logged
Speigass
banzai
EIR Veteran
Posts: 114
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #14 on:
September 27, 2010, 07:55:32 am »
Luftwaffe logistics line is a bit weird... T4 buffs both unit unlocks and offmaps. T3 buffs upgrade unlocks. So in the end u are using only half of buffs because u can not unlock units+offfmaps+upgrades. That makes this tree much weaker than other 2. T3 and T4 itself are not bad, but being in the same line isn't good.
I am also curious about 95mm cromwell, is it like StuH? or AVRE? or Priest? or Mortar halftrack?
«
Last Edit: September 27, 2010, 07:58:01 am by Speigass
»
Logged
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #15 on:
September 27, 2010, 10:53:06 am »
95mm is like a stuh on a cromwell, nuff said to teh awesomenss
Logged
Wolster
EIR Veteran
Posts: 52
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #16 on:
September 28, 2010, 11:47:13 am »
Armour Doctrine
The Pershing
When i look at the armour doctrine im always worried about how many buffs can be landed on this axis problem causing unit, & once again a fully vetted one of these with a good combination of Doctrine buffs is going to be a complete nightmare for all Whermacht to defeat.
Please bear in mind that whilst axis players have access to a miriad of wonderful tanks, one long range sticky from a crappy vet 2 rifle squad makes them next to worthless, the americans have no such issues & vet 3 Pershings are getting ridiculously common, because we have no cheap immobalizer, (bring back the engine damage fausts to make things more even) or more reasonablely get rid of the long range stickies altogether so our Panthers can have a decent shot at taking down one of these mofos.
Let the slating begin, from the usual l2p arses.
«
Last Edit: September 28, 2010, 11:51:08 am by Wolster
»
Logged
lazuka12
EIR Regular
Posts: 27
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #17 on:
September 28, 2010, 12:41:16 pm »
If you have panther you should try to keep distance to infranty. Especially if you know they could damage your engine or immobilize or button you.
Logged
EIRR: INeedMoreVolks,SpamRiflesOrLOL
3rdCondor
Donator
Posts: 1536
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #18 on:
September 28, 2010, 01:14:07 pm »
Use a bike and a panther together. If u max range, u will succeed.
Logged
Quote from: Alpha TIG on August 08, 2012, 11:55:14 pm
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
Quote from: Smokaz on August 14, 2012, 04:15:58 pm
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
Quote from: TheIcelandicManiac on November 28, 2012, 04:04:22 pm
My beautiful black pussy won
Spartan_Marine88
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838
Re: Doctrine Draft Discussion
«
Reply #19 on:
September 28, 2010, 01:19:29 pm »
Quote from: Tymathee on September 27, 2010, 10:53:06 am
95mm is like a stuh on a cromwell, nuff said to teh awesomenss
No flank speed though
Quote from: Wolster on September 28, 2010, 11:47:13 am
Armour Doctrine
The Pershing
Please bear in mind that whilst axis players have access to a miriad of wonderful tanks, one long range sticky from a crappy vet 2 rifle squad makes them next to worthless, the americans have no such issues & vet 3 Pershings are getting ridiculously common
there are only 7 vet 3 Pershings in the game atm
to the hmm 12 vet 3 Tigers
Lets face it, Axis tanks just rip up everything allied
As soon as something comes that even appears to be an equalizer, they just cry OP allied stuff gets nerfed Axis get another Direct Fire Nebel
«
Last Edit: September 28, 2010, 01:24:03 pm by Spartan_Marine88
»
Logged
Quote from: Sachaztan on March 24, 2013, 03:49:43 pm
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...