sheffer
|
« Reply #20 on: February 04, 2011, 07:17:16 am » |
|
17Pdr has the same range as regular ATGs. It has no longer nor shorter range.
17Pdr - 65m 57mm - 60m
|
|
|
Logged
|
Senseless and ruthless.
|
|
|
kwiatekkek
okultysta, mistyk, szachista i alpinista.
Posts: 702
|
« Reply #21 on: February 04, 2011, 08:32:42 am » |
|
say no to PE paks!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"L2P" is like a Auswitcz tattoo on your arm, a mark of the survivor.
*cough* Team Lead is Allied bias, just FYI
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
« Reply #22 on: February 04, 2011, 08:49:37 am » |
|
say no to PE paks!
hehehehehhehehehheheh when the tank hunter doc will be added they (me) will have one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder
|
|
|
kwiatekkek
okultysta, mistyk, szachista i alpinista.
Posts: 702
|
« Reply #23 on: February 04, 2011, 09:11:31 am » |
|
all support weapons will only ecourage a campy play style which PE is not designed for. i duno do we realy want another Wehr wearing different uniforms?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #24 on: February 04, 2011, 09:15:34 am » |
|
marder is fine,it's 50mm that is shitty,lol
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
« Reply #25 on: February 04, 2011, 09:17:06 am » |
|
all support weapons will only ecourage a campy play style which PE is not designed for. i duno do we realy want another Wehr wearing different uniforms?
why not? Pak 36: Light ATG with Stielgranate 41 and Treadbraker if the atgun gets cloack it should be able to combat most m10rushes on jagds and hetzers and enable me to keep my enemy in my jagds cone of fire for longer and adding the APCR any sherman or m10 should die in 2-3 shots.
|
|
« Last Edit: February 04, 2011, 09:19:26 am by TheIcelandicManiac »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NightRain
|
« Reply #26 on: February 04, 2011, 09:33:07 am » |
|
LATHTs are excellent with Treadbreaker. Every marder should always be accompanied by one. It is like companing a sticky squad next to a atg except your scheisse will be more mobile and gets a bonus (focus fire) on it. Add in a ketten and you can spot them too
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #27 on: February 04, 2011, 09:36:08 am » |
|
Personally i'm not too keen on the Pak36.. It seems like nothing more than an inbreed between a LATHT and an ostwind that can't move as fast as either.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BigDick
|
« Reply #28 on: February 04, 2011, 09:40:21 am » |
|
LATHTs are excellent with Treadbreaker. Every marder should always be accompanied by one. It is like companing a sticky squad next to a atg except your scheisse will be more mobile and gets a bonus (focus fire) on it. Add in a ketten and you can spot them too
lol paying 60 fuel and almost 100mun for the only temporary vehicle engine damager in the game? are you serious? who buys this shit? lást time i saw it used was by a noob telling me that his g43 gren upgrade are at rifles and the light at ht is the only "at" he got in core callin why not? Pak 36: Light ATG with
wouldnt fix the issues pe got reliable fighting and penetrating churchill and pershing armor
|
|
« Last Edit: February 04, 2011, 09:42:33 am by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
« Reply #29 on: February 04, 2011, 09:51:45 am » |
|
50mm needs some love
|
|
|
Logged
|
Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves Nevergetsputonlistguy767
|
|
|
kwiatekkek
okultysta, mistyk, szachista i alpinista.
Posts: 702
|
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2011, 10:08:25 am » |
|
where are all those crazy fuked up PE early game rushes ? gg within first 10 - 15mins. nobodys doin it anymore. PE slowly becomes a new Wehr ....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NightRain
|
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2011, 10:28:46 am » |
|
lol paying 60 fuel and almost 100mun for the only temporary vehicle engine damager in the game? are you serious? who buys this shit?
lást time i saw it used was by a noob telling me that his g43 gren upgrade are at rifles and the light at ht is the only "at" he got in core callin wouldnt fix the issues pe got reliable fighting and penetrating churchill and pershing armor
200 fuel investment for anti tank and anti infantry. I say its worth it vs every tank you can see. If its pershing you will shit bricks. If it is M10 you don't need to treadbreak it. If its churchill croc, you shit bricks. If it is a LV you can slow it down so that it wont get your marder. T17 awsome, M8 good etc. Plus LATHT can help marder and penetrate light vehicles AND take on infantry with its focus fire *Shit bricks= Joy cause you can kill 'em!
|
|
« Last Edit: February 04, 2011, 10:44:39 am by NightRain »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2011, 10:34:27 am » |
|
Id like to see you micro all that at once from ATG creep, rangers, airborne, commandos. actually. prove it with 5 replays against competent players or your argument is shit and zero
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NightRain
|
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2011, 10:41:00 am » |
|
Id like to see you micro all that at once from ATG creep, rangers, airborne, commandos. actually. prove it with 5 replays against competent players or your argument is shit and zero
I don't see any point in your statement, why I'd have to play vs ATGs and infantry with a Marder III and a LATHT? When both are anti tank only with LATHT having Focus Fire vs infantry. I only said that it is a mere investment vs Armor not vs infantry, ATGs and stuff. The LATHT gives infantry hard time while it and treadbreaker gives hard time vs armored units.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2011, 10:46:09 am » |
|
Because no encounter is ever Anti-tank vs Tank. any reasoning that relies on this to happen fails.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NightRain
|
« Reply #35 on: February 04, 2011, 10:57:45 am » |
|
Because no encounter is ever Anti-tank vs Tank. any reasoning that relies on this to happen fails.
If it is anti tank gun and Tank you can kite the anti tank gun by pulling backward. Plus ATG + a tank would vary from 10-15 + 5 pop when your callin is solid 9 pop.you could use a pg squad to throw a inc nade on the atg and move your atgs up while the enemy atg burns or has to move giving you time to pop few shots on the enemy tank. But either way that falls into theorycrafting.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
8thRifleRegiment
|
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2011, 11:09:02 am » |
|
imo the PE just need to get a manned at weapon, all of the PE at at the moment is beaten down by ATG spam
|
|
|
Logged
|
I will never forget the rage we enduced together Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #37 on: February 04, 2011, 11:11:26 am » |
|
imo the PE just need to get a manned at weapon, all of the PE at at the moment is beaten down by ATG spam
so ? atg is not a counter to atg. If you don't want to get killed by atgs buy shrecks.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BigDick
|
« Reply #38 on: February 04, 2011, 11:39:42 am » |
|
tanks and vehicles are almost a hardcounter to pzgrens with shreks wich are more expensive then 100x recrew able ATGs only use of shreks are in support to prevent circling marders or ATGs but not as rely able AT that still don't help against ATG creeping or some supercheap 100% accurate and penetrating boys AT rifle attacks
there is a reason why even blitz wehr players rely onto paks as their fallback AT instead of just getting storms with shreks
|
|
« Last Edit: February 04, 2011, 11:41:24 am by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #39 on: February 04, 2011, 12:18:43 pm » |
|
imo the PE just need to get a manned at weapon, all of the PE at at the moment is beaten down by ATG spam
Schrecks?
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
|