nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« on: March 12, 2011, 08:29:39 am » |
|
imo current balancing of stummel is pretty good , but like stuh , it has non movable turret and even the gun has no firing arc so you have to turn whole puma, maybe make it movable ? Pumas die pretty fast and you have to stand with it and shoot and it's a big disadvantage to its survivability.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 08:33:28 am by nugnugx »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2011, 08:34:22 am » |
|
Stummel?
234/3 or 251/9???
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2011, 08:34:34 am » |
|
Stummel?
234/3 or 251/9???
what?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2011, 08:36:03 am » |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 08:39:35 am by TheIcelandicManiac »
|
Logged
|
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.
Work Harder
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2011, 08:43:56 am » |
|
or its just a complete mis-model... does this thing fire STuh shells? if so thats insane since, neither of those vehicles had the Stugs 105mm gun.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2011, 08:45:34 am » |
|
does this thing fire STuh shells? if so thats insane since, neither of those vehicles had the Stugs 105mm gun.
no, it fires the same shell as leig i think, it does not make stuhs damage, its weaker.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2011, 08:46:18 am » |
|
no, it fires the same shell as leig i think, it does not make stuhs damage, its weaker.
i c.. i figured it would or should shoot the same as a IST...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheIcelandicManiac
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
Posts: 6294
|
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2011, 08:47:02 am » |
|
That would be awesome.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2011, 08:48:52 am » |
|
uh the damage is ok , nothing wrong with it. I was telling about the non movable turret in first post.
I was using it and noticed the worst thing is that you have to stand and shoot with a puma, the range is also closer so you have to move up , risking a sticky.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2011, 08:50:13 am » |
|
uh the damage is ok , nothing wrong with it. I was telling about the non movable turret in first post.
I was using it and noticed the worst thing is that you have to stand and shoot with a puma.
well, probably because it never had a turrent... it was just a stationary gun.. so the entire vehicle did have to move.. kinda like the TDs the germans had.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2011, 08:51:56 am » |
|
don't bring reality arguments into coh and eir. it has been said 100000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000 times.
balancing is for gameplay and not reality.
in reality tanks did not fight shooting from 1 meter , soldiers did not throw wave of grenades one after another chasing other soldiers across the battlefield , artilery was not standing 50 meters behind front line to fire on its target.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 08:54:48 am by nugnugx »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2011, 08:56:04 am » |
|
don't bring reality arguments into coh and eir. it has been said 100000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000 times.
ya, but comon, we dont need to start just creating totally fake units now do we?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2011, 08:57:48 am » |
|
ya, but comon, we dont need to start just creating totally fake units now do we?
whole coh is fake , like someone said everything could be replaced with pink unicorns vs care bears and we would have the same game.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mgallun74
|
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2011, 09:01:36 am » |
|
whole coh is fake , like someone said everything could be replaced with pink unicorns vs care bears and we would have the same game.
i suppose, if your into that kinda stuff.. have fun man.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2011, 09:12:53 am » |
|
When i used this unit a week and a half ago, It was utter shit. I sat two of them firing at some commandoes and they didnt hit shit, and the fact it has no turret contradicts the point of being a light vehicle.
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
|
|
|
RoyalHants
|
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2011, 09:33:27 am » |
|
Its a GMC but with puma armour afaik (correct if wrong) cheap and dispensible
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yeah calbanes, I mean - some people like smokaz are still yet to win a single game, even though they've been around here for years.
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2011, 10:29:34 am » |
|
We've got the 251/9 model in there. It was supposed to have a squad capacity as well as the gun.
We can look into a slight arc of firing or a aimtime reduction if it's too terrible to shoot(like old StuG)
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted! the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2011, 11:07:50 am » |
|
We can look into a slight arc of firing or a aimtime reduction if it's too terrible to shoot(like old StuG)
arc of firing + aimtime would be good, what's the aim time right now? cause it takes some time before he fires the round.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2011, 12:24:46 pm » |
|
the 75mm gmc has the same type of gun pretty much. no turret, you gotta rotate to fire. just l2p with it, it's a new unit, it takes time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
chefarzt
|
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2011, 12:46:12 pm » |
|
WEll when i tried it with sparks quite a few days ago it took like 3 shots to put a rifle squad to low health and i think the 4th shot obliterated it. BUT. I didnt move the rifles and had no at on. So basicly i found the unit quite useless. But maybe he changed it.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 12:48:49 pm by chefarzt »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|