puddin
|
|
« on: March 14, 2011, 07:37:29 pm » |
|
Should get sprint with the unit at no extra cost.
Every other elite inf gets fireup, cloak, or smoke, they should get sprint free.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Puddin' spamtmi cant really blame smokaz i mean playing against puddin is like trying to fight off breast cancer. You might win and do it and be a bad ass but you'll feel sick and mutilated forever.
Puddin' spamtm is soulcrushing... what's hard to understand about that?
|
|
|
Uglysori
EIR Veteran Posts: 301
The very best player of one of the four factions.
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2011, 09:00:39 pm » |
|
KCH don't?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2011, 09:07:19 pm » |
|
flammen grenadiers don't
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
| spinn72
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2011, 09:35:56 pm » |
|
Thread fail.
Removal of sprint at vet 2 kind of ruins the whole persistancy thing. Now when my falls gain vet they gain minor buffs that I don't really care about.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2011, 11:48:23 pm » |
|
rofl you know what would solve the fucking issue? make it the way it was before, all sprint at vet two, what was the problem with that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I will never forget the rage we enduced together  Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2011, 12:09:14 am » |
|
Stop swearing you're hurting the devs feelings.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| puddin
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2011, 05:16:24 pm » |
|
KCH are not unlockable, THe 4th man is, But its like Pgrens... And i don;t think those should have it.
But falls on the other hand, I have played against them and with them on my team, they underperform in most EIR circumstances. Yes they have moments, but not enough to warrent the elite inf tag or really a special unit unlock at the moment.. Compaire them to Airborne their allied counterpart and they woefully underperform.
Just think they should get some love.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2011, 06:12:05 pm » |
|
+1 ^ so then maybe ill actually see a falls player in the near future and maybe i can play my own again
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2011, 11:25:47 pm » |
|
Falls are the only elite infantry that own me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2011, 03:56:58 am » |
|
or give em back 'broken' medikits,that's all the love world can give you  terminators dont need sprint,problem solwed! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| spinn72
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2011, 05:38:00 am » |
|
Heartmann's opinion > everyones.
Lets see what he has to say!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| cloud234
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2011, 06:58:22 am » |
|
The amount of buffs Falls get from Luftwaffles is just wtflol.
I think gaining abilities with vet just encourages more vet whoring... much better to let people just buy things off the bat. If it gives an advantage, they have traded it off in resources... if it doesn't, they're paying for flexibility in playing.
Either way, I think tying skills with vet encourages... gameplay which is not beneficial for eirr.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| panzerman
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2011, 07:02:06 am » |
|
they still aren't that good at anything but defending in green cover...even with that ab armour they still die so quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| chefarzt
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2011, 10:29:49 am » |
|
The amount of buffs Falls get from Luftwaffles is just wtflol.
I think gaining abilities with vet just encourages more vet whoring... much better to let people just buy things off the bat. If it gives an advantage, they have traded it off in resources... if it doesn't, they're paying for flexibility in playing.
Either way, I think tying skills with vet encourages... gameplay which is not beneficial for eirr.
check the inf doctrine |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
