| 
			| 
					
						| DarkSoldierX   | 
								| «  on: March 17, 2011, 01:15:22 pm » |  | 
 
 1. For HVAP rounds on the Pershing vs panther it doesn't get the 15% increased damage ontop of the 10% increased damage. So Dmg mult is supposed to be 1.25 instead of 1.12.  The tooltip says 10% increased damage. You assume thats vs everything. This is wrong. It is 10% increased dmg vs VEHICLES only3.  On the website spreadsheet it says Sherman Upgun gets 10% dmg ontop of the other 10% increased damage. This is true. In launcher it needs to say that you receive 10% ontop of the other 10%. 1 is a bug, 2 and 3 are more of tooltip fixes instead of actual bugs in the system. Hope this helps devs   |  
						| 
								|  |  
								| « Last Edit: March 17, 2011, 01:21:11 pm by DarkSoldierX » |  Logged | 
 
 two wordsatgs and fireflies
 
 Looks who's butthurt |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| DarkSoldierX   | 
								| « Reply #1 on: June 06, 2011, 05:13:55 pm » |  | 
 
 Bug/tooltip improvments not in. |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| brn4meplz  
								Misinformation Officer  Posts: 6952   | 
								| « Reply #2 on: June 06, 2011, 05:25:18 pm » |  | 
 
 I'm in the process of moving and you'll have to wait till it gets updated/I confirm it's intended to be this way |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 
 He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!   the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom   |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| panzerman   | 
								| « Reply #3 on: June 07, 2011, 01:35:26 am » |  | 
 
 1. For HVAP rounds on the Pershing vs panther it doesn't get the 15% increased damage ontop of the 10% increased damage. So Dmg mult is supposed to be 1.25 instead of 1.12.  The tooltip says 10% increased damage. You assume thats vs everything. This is wrong. It is 10% increased dmg vs VEHICLES only3.  On the website spreadsheet it says Sherman Upgun gets 10% dmg ontop of the other 10% increased damage. This is true. In launcher it needs to say that you receive 10% ontop of the other 10%. 1 is a bug, 2 and 3 are more of tooltip fixes instead of actual bugs in the system. Hope this helps devs   still rapes panthers. |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #4 on: June 07, 2011, 01:55:44 am » |  | 
 
 the tooltip description is some kind of weird
 it says the pershing get vcoh hvap gun but it gets a much better gun in eir
 and other than the tooltip says there are no damage buffs attached in vcoh only penetration buffs and reduced splash
 
 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| NightRain   | 
								| « Reply #5 on: June 07, 2011, 03:16:37 am » |  | 
 
 On the other hand Tiger should get the HEAT gun that is listed in the RGDs   |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 
 Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
  |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #6 on: June 07, 2011, 03:32:52 am » |  | 
 
 would me make stop playing with tigers tbh a tiger completely misses every second shot i don't want because of increased rage factor when that happens    |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| nugnugx  
								Donator  Posts: 4051  
								 | 
								| « Reply #7 on: June 07, 2011, 03:35:18 am » |  | 
 
 T17 in RGDs normal gun has  0.4/0.6/1 pen  and HVAP 0.5/0.75/1.25
 
 It does not get 25% on long and medium range, only on close range.
 
 
 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #8 on: June 07, 2011, 03:37:34 am » |  | 
 
 ehm 25% of 0.4 is 0.1 and that means 0.5 of hvap t17 gun is correct? |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| nugnugx  
								Donator  Posts: 4051  
								 | 
								| « Reply #9 on: June 07, 2011, 03:38:27 am » |  | 
 
 ehm 25% of 0.4 is 0.1 and that means 0.5 of hvap t17 gun is correct?
 Isn't it additonal 25%  and not of 0.4 ?  |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #10 on: June 07, 2011, 03:41:44 am » |  | 
 
 125%*0.4=0.5
 or 25% of 0.4=0.1 so its 0.1 modifier more
 
 thats why its % and not +0.25 modifier lol that would completely fuck up unit stats between each other when a pershing e.g. gets +0.25 more penetration and a T17 to
 
 that would buff a T17 much much more than the pershing
 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								| « Last Edit: June 07, 2011, 03:43:38 am by BigDick » |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| nugnugx  
								Donator  Posts: 4051  
								 | 
								| « Reply #11 on: June 07, 2011, 03:44:47 am » |  | 
 
 125%*0.4=0.5
 or 25% of 0.4=0.1 so its 0.1 modifier more
 
 thats why its % and not +0.25 modifier lol
 
 I know that. Then the tooltip is written wrong. Because tooltip suggests additional 25%, so people think it's additional 25% for all ranges. |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #12 on: June 07, 2011, 03:45:50 am » |  | 
 
 and what is wrong with that? please don't turn into a copy of tym
 100%+25%=125%*0.4=0.5
 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| nugnugx  
								Donator  Posts: 4051  
								 | 
								| « Reply #13 on: June 07, 2011, 03:46:56 am » |  | 
 
 and what is wrong with that? please don't turn into a copy of tym
 100%+25%=125%*0.4=0.5
 
 0.4+0.25 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #14 on: June 07, 2011, 03:50:11 am » |  | 
 
 thats no additional 25% dude thats additional 62.5%    |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| nugnugx  
								Donator  Posts: 4051  
								 | 
								| « Reply #15 on: June 07, 2011, 03:52:32 am » |  | 
 
 thats no additional 25% dude thats additional 62.5%   if 1 = 100%    then 0.4 = 40%  so  additional 25% of 100%  is  0.25 for every range. 0.4+0.25  0.6+0.25 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #16 on: June 07, 2011, 03:56:12 am » |  | 
 
 but it has no 1 penetration modifier on long range it has 0.4 so 0.4=100%
 but actually waste of time i give up lol
 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| nugnugx  
								Donator  Posts: 4051  
								 | 
								| « Reply #17 on: June 07, 2011, 03:56:57 am » |  | 
 
 but it has no 1 penetration modifier on long range it has 0.4 so 0.4=100%
 
 That's why it's silly that 0.4 = 100% It's like saying 4 = 10 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| BigDick | 
								| « Reply #18 on: June 07, 2011, 04:00:14 am » |  | 
 
 your lucky that there is no space left in my sig    |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 |  |  | 
	| 
			| 
					
						| Mysthalin  
								Tired King of Stats  Posts: 9028   | 
								| « Reply #19 on: June 07, 2011, 05:09:11 am » |  | 
 
 You are a retard nug.
 In every single instance of a modifier buff in EiRR +x% means 1.x modifier to a stat (hence, in this case the +25% buff means 0.4*1.25=0.5). It is how it has always been, and you're just making a fuss over nothing.
 
 +0.x buffs do exist (look at RCA top T4) - and they're described differently.
 |  
						| 
								|  |  
								|  |  Logged | 
 
 |  |  | 
	|  |