*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 13, 2024, 04:22:56 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Canadian Infantry vs British Infantry  (Read 2361 times)
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« on: March 27, 2011, 08:59:47 pm »

Is one stronger than the other? I notice canadian is more expensive.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Scotzmen Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2035


« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2011, 09:27:53 pm »

Firesparks was testing the pricing of the units. so no stats changes.
Logged
Groundfire Offline
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran
Posts: 8511



« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2011, 09:33:21 pm »

No, they are actually quite different and if firesparks would like to come out and state what he's doing with these british units, ill just concede the floor to him.
Logged

Latest Shoutcast:
EIRR Groundcast 11 "The Super Dev Showdown!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGm79rXWhU (full version)

Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2011, 09:58:10 pm »

:O that's racism. Your comparing canadian to british, if one is weaker or stronger then the other, and they have the exact equipment, then it constitutes to racism

political correctiveness firesparks has forgotten about. thats why we dont see swastikas in the game
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Firesparks Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 1209



« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2011, 10:05:12 pm »

the new british infantry lose their soldier armor and have a stronger lee enfield.

I didn't do a version for Canadian infantry because it's only meant to be a test currently. If We switch to the new version the Canadian Infantry will be changed as well.
Logged


With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2011, 10:44:33 pm »

i like them, i haven't really noticed the difference with the soldier armor but it really only shows its face against machine guns
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Scotzmen Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2035


« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2011, 11:32:45 pm »

by stronger lee enfield what do you mean?
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2011, 12:23:20 am »

Its probably a Volk kar type. better longer range shitty close range
Logged
Scotzmen Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2035


« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2011, 12:26:17 am »

raped by hmg's for better long range accuary? good trade off?
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2011, 02:46:24 am »

Its probably a Volk kar type. better longer range shitty close range

actually the lee enfield has good longrange accuracy (compared to its short range accuracy) when ever it would be the way arround on british infantry
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 35 queries.