Pe Panther 3 as medium AT tank

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Demon767]

There is also pershing , but allies have m10 and atg.
There is Tiger and KT but axis got p4s.

You argument is invalid

leave out infantry noob

Pershings is a doctrine unlock which you have to gain xp to acquire. It is better in both AT and AI or people wouldnt buy pershings
Tiger and KT are doctrine unlocks which you have to gain xp to acquire. It is better in both AT and AI or people wouldnt buy them

No your arguments are nullified because they are pointless  ' there is panther, so why bring other lighter tank'.  Because some people want to have other options than 1 heavy tank.

No noob, What you want to implement is a shitter version of a Panther. Stop making up theory to prove you are right.

[nugnugx]

You are the noob, can't make a proper argument so start to flame.  What you posted is bs.

and leave out atg now ?   YOU are the first one who said about 50mm and marder which are the mobile versions of atgs.If you don't understand that 50mm=atg then you are the dumbfuck.

Hetzer is also a doctrine unlock, ffs go and read your post back, another idiot who is contradicting himself.

No noob, What you want to implement is a shitter version of a Panther. Stop making up theory to prove you are right.

By your idiot logic  sherman is a shittier version of pershing  and p4 is shittier version of tiger

[Demon767]

You are the noob, can't make a proper argument so start to flame.  What you posted is bs.

and leave out atg now ?   YOU are the first one who said about 50mm and marder which are the mobile versions of atgs.If you don't understand that 50mm=atg then you are the dumbfuck.

Hetzer is also a doctrine unlock, ffs go and read your post back, another idiot who is contradicting himself.



But your idiot logic  sherman is a shittier version of pershing  and p4 is shittier version of tiger

Bullshit that is correct and negates yours. yes i agree noob

omfg you are so thick! They are support units you noob, i said leave out infantry because they are not even related to this argument! noob.

omg your dumb,

We had no choice of implementation of the Hetzer. Take it out then

omg man. Yes we know Sherman is shittier then Pershing. If the Tiger and Pershing was a global unlock, You wouldnt see the Sherman or P4s. you know why? because they are 'better versions of an identically role unit. But No, the tiger and Pershings are superior doctrine unlock units. i reiterate, if everyone had access to pershings and tigers, there will be no use for shermans of p4s. but no, its doctrine unlock thus is why you have Shermans and P4s.

such a noob.

[Sachaztan]

Let the flamewar begin!

[nugnugx]

there will be no use for shermans of p4s. but no, its doctrine unlock thus is why you have Shermans and P4s.

Wrong again,  there are people who take shermans/m10 over persh and p4s/stugs over tiger.

Guess you didn't see keeps p4 blitz spam.