*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 30, 2024, 10:03:26 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Vet before/after rework  (Read 3512 times)
0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« on: July 11, 2011, 09:16:14 pm »

I'm curious as to how it turns out. There are some units that I think need to be looked at, and I know most units are known, but it's obvious some units always seem to be over looked.

Mine sweepers:
These units should get health/incoming accuracy modifiers, and maybe at vet 3 give them elite crits or something. They just need to be more survivable that is all.

Engs/Pios: They get increased accuracy at vet 2, should be more received accuracy or something of the sort, since if they are seeing combat, they have a flamer thrower on them most likely, and there fore accuracy bonus is not really needed.

AB Medic: increased healing rate/range, self heal, better weapons, all of these would be very cool. like harder to hit/less damage at vet 1, self heal at vet 2, BARs at vet 3 or improved rate/range.

GMC M3: does the accuracy bonus help since it's an arty style shell?

US croc: another unit, doesn't need accuracy buff.

t17: does it benefit from the penetration buff? because it doesnt seem to penetrate even a puma.




it really comes down to units having copy and pasted vet, i hope when the rework is done that each unit has unique vet that helps it do its job better.

i'm still going through the vet tables will add more later!
« Last Edit: July 30, 2011, 01:51:32 pm by RikiRude » Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
brn4meplz Offline
Misinformation Officer
*
Posts: 6952


« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2011, 10:22:59 pm »

Yes GMC benefits from Accuracy,
Yes Croc benefits from Acc.
T17. No it's pen is junk
Logged

He thinks Tactics is a breath mint

Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  Tongue

the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom Wink
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2011, 10:40:00 pm »

Yes GMC benefits from Accuracy,
Yes Croc benefits from Acc.
T17. No it's pen is junk
Seeing that flamethrower acc is very high, 0.9 at all ranges and 0.9 when moving, acc on the flamethrower really isnt too useful, even if the infantry squad had receive acc. buffs.

And yes t17 pen is fail.

But hey guys, look on the bright side, at least its not received penetration buffs on PE light vehicles like in OMG.
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2011, 04:12:16 am »

GMC doesn't really benefit from accuracy tbh.

Since flamethrowers are, in actuality, a weird kind of artillery - they do in fact just.. not get anything from accuracy boosts. They require damage boosts to actually gain any extra utility.
Logged

Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2011, 04:27:59 am »

Veterancy was largely standardised, i.e all infantry got +- same vet 1 - 3. Which is why you sometimes get odd results like engineers getting +20% accuracy.
Logged
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2011, 06:14:35 am »

Doesnt help them at all since they have to close to 20 range to shoot. Which is completely retarded, but whatever.
Logged

Quote from: tank130
I want to ensure we have a 100% decision on the process before we do the wipe.
If not, then I wipe, then someone gets something they shouldn't, then it gets abused, then the shit hits the fan and then I ban shab.

Getting EiR:R Released on Steam

Forum Rules & Guidelines
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2011, 06:16:37 am »

Would love for flamers to get a type of "Flush out" ability at vet 3, putting a house on fire and forcing the squad AI inside to leave the building. OR alternatively just insta-roast them!
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
deadbolt Offline
Probably Banned
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4410



« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2011, 07:03:27 am »

Would love for flamers to get a type of "Flush out" ability at vet 3, putting a house on fire and forcing the squad AI inside to leave the building. OR alternatively just insta-roast them!

insta gib units ftw. +1
Logged

DERDBERT
Like Jesus, Keeps died for us

He made a funny thread for bear, and got banned.

Now bear makes his own funny thread. It's unsurprisingly not funny.

Keeps died for our funny threads.
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2011, 07:18:21 am »

PM me vet-related abilities! Going to try and fit as many as I can into my doctrine unlocks bs. No, Im not making this crap gloriously OP, whenever I suggest something that is, dont take it at face value ppl.

The 'Flush Out!' ability actually sounds nice, +1.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2011, 07:51:59 am »

range, cooldown, reload woudl really benefit flamers more.

aoe would be better for the gmc than accuracy. maybe add a barrage ability like the leig so it can shoot over houses
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #10 on: July 12, 2011, 09:57:28 am »

range, cooldown, reload woudl really benefit flamers more.

aoe would be better for the gmc than accuracy. maybe add a barrage ability like the leig so it can shoot over houses

oh i like the way you think tym! faster reload would be nice on gmc too.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2011, 01:51:50 pm »

added AB medic to the list.
Logged
pandaExpress Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 282



« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2011, 02:29:34 pm »

Bergetiger vet is crap to

Vet 1    Received damage 0.85
Vet 2    Received damage 0.85 Speed 1.15
Vet 3    Received penetration 0.8 Sight +10
Logged

they tell me i'm weird i tell them their normal
Vermillion_Hawk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1282



« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2011, 04:18:46 pm »

Bergetiger vet is crap to

Vet 1    Received damage 0.85
Vet 2    Received damage 0.85 Speed 1.15
Vet 3    Received penetration 0.8 Sight +10

That would actually be good, since a vet 3 Bergetiger would be more resilient when going out on the battlefield to retrieve wrecks.
Logged

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.

- Andre Malraux

- Dracula
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2011, 07:16:20 pm »

if you dont like the vet make a suggestion if you have any!

i always thought the vet for the berge was supposed to be pretty good since it can soak so much damage, plus it has tiger armor, so its high priority.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 35 queries.