S-E tatics with roadblock issue

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Rosette]

Panzer Pioneer's Roadblocks

very-fast-build-time

it-makes-me-crazy

can't-crush-with-pershing

jesus-hell-christ-ffs

[pandaExpress]

whats the point of this?
 why not just post on my replay?

[Rosette]

whats the point of this?
 why not just post on my replay?

need some nerf on building time

[pandaExpress]

no i mean i have a tread with the replay in it

[Rosette]

no i mean i have a tread with the replay in it

then, post it. lol

[pandaExpress]

road block have lots of problems

the build distance is to long (LV can drive straight threw a line of them)
build time needs to be toned down for pgrens but i think it should stay the same for panzer pios
and they shot block

[Poppi]

lol just played steelblazin.

i think he built about 50+ of those in 10 mins. Built it across the bogage map and layered it about 3-4 layers deep. Destroy a pocket to break through and 10 more  took its place.

Build time needs to drastically increased. You can build across any map in a matter of minutes easy.

[BigDick]

so a game looking like a grief attempt turned out into the greatest tactical maneuver and masterplan since hannibal passed the alps?

will watch  

replay thread: http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=20318.msg355997;topicseen#new

[Demon767]

bout time someone started building road blocks like i had done with the initiation of SE. not surprised it was going to be Panda express to think of the ingenious idea!

+1 to panda

[spinn72]

bout time someone started building road blocks like i had done with the initiation of SE. not surprised it was going to be Panda express to think of the ingenious idea!

+1 to panda

Don't EVER encourage panda ffs.
He was clearly doing it to grief, unlike you who may actually use them for a serious reason.

[Demon767]

I say keep em coming, players will gain more knowledge about tactics from his 'griefing' then any other player can provide.

[Unkn0wn]

Will look into it.

[BigDick]

watched the replay

panda are you gorkhalis twin?  

- gorkhali will love that game! 3 hummels on the field at same time (and later additional 2 wehr stukkas)

- allies were way to passive at the beginning and deserved being blocked of the map by tanktraps/roadblocks/wire

- i'm sure we will see domfortress play with much artillery much more when warmap is in with attack/defense

- the bad point is that panda had zero vehicle kills...

dunno if that company could compete without doomfortress defense campking rikirude and the good marder use of armedshit or against more aggressive allies

[Tymathee]

watched the replay

panda are you gorkhalis twin? 

- gorkhali will love that game! 3 hummels on the field at same time (and later additional 2 wehr stukkas)

- allies were way to passive at the beginning and deserved being blocked of the map by tanktraps/roadblocks/wire

- i'm sure we will see domfortress play with much artillery much more when warmap is in with attack/defense

- the bad point is that panda had zero vehicle kills...

dunno if that company could compete without doomfortress defense campking rikirude and the good marder use of armedshit or against more aggressive allies

- allies were way to passive at the beginning and deserved being blocked of the map by tanktraps/roadblocks/wire

thats the biggest thing he said. IF the allies were aggressive, they dont get blocked off, it was their own fault, not the tactic.

Before you whine about a new tactic, play it a few times and try to adjust to it, if you keep losing to it, it's the tactic, if you can adjust to it and beat it, it was you, thats why you never see me post balance threads before i've ran across the tactic 5-10 times because you can't correctly gauge something by one guy using it.
Although, if you start seeing a mass exodus to the plan, like 4man kch, stummels, cromwell spam, etc then it's easy to tell its OP.

This is all the allied players fault and i see nothing wrong with it.

[pandaExpress]

i wasent doing it to grief this is my HUMMEL company how else am i suposto protect 3 hummels on the feild this whole company is based on 3 hummels i'm just Useing SE like its ment to be used (funneling and MAss destruction threw arty)

[DarkSoldierX]

i wasent doing it to grief this is my HUMMEL company how else am i suposto protect 3 hummels on the feild this whole company is based on 3 hummels i'm just Useing SE like its ment to be used (funneling and MAss destruction threw arty)

Thats how one of my  SE company build was made, except I only made 1 layer of defense, and secured it with many mines.

Back when vet 3 hotchstuka with bottom t3 had barrage every minute >.<, which is still sorta sad seeing how stuka's can be fail anyway.

Now what I do consider grief is that he roadblocked my spawn 1 game. I thats pretty griefy.

[Unkn0wn]

Couldn't you have just roadblocked a smaller area surrounding the hummels? I don't see why you'd have to build 3 layers of roadblocks across the width of a map. Anyway, a company with nothing but panzerpioneers sounds pretty grief-like in my opinion and I would kindly ask you to refrain from building such companies again.

[pandaExpress]

i barely used any panzer pios that game if you watched the replay i had 2 sreck squad build all of the road blocks
and the road blocks were built after 2 hummels got onto the field i blame the passive allies

[RikiRude]

i thought the whole point of pandas company was to grief the first time i played, and i just quit, then he raged at me, when i realized it was panda, and not some random person being a dick, the second game i played with him adhered to his tactics, and well we won the game, as boring as it was.